Skip to comments.
JVERITAS Responds to the 11/3 NYT Article Regarding Iraq Nuclear Program.
November 3rd 2006
| jveritas
Posted on 11/02/2006 8:48:45 PM PST by jveritas
Edited on 11/02/2006 11:06:31 PM PST by Admin Moderator.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180, 181-200, 201-220 ... 501-512 next last
To: waimea.man
181
posted on
11/02/2006 10:04:35 PM PST
by
jveritas
(Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
To: Eva
"I thought that Judith Miller covered the Middle East for the NYT and supported the WMD assertion."
Miller also risked her life--traveling to Kurdistan--to get interviews and hard evidence on Saddam's and "Chemical Ali"'s use of mustard, sarin and nerve gas to murder thousands of Kurds. Miller's insistence that Iraq possessed, and was developing, weapons of mass destruction put her at odds with the quirky Times publisher and chairman Arthur "Pinch" Sulzberger Jr. When she refused to participate in the lynching of Karl Rove, in the Plame affair, she was judged politically unreliable by Sulzberger and fired. This was after spending three months in lock-up for not revealing sources. Miller's books and articles on WMD represent some of the rare, objective journalism produced by the Times since the politically partisan "Pinch" took over the Times. When Sulzberger, as publisher, fired Miller, he removed the ethical and organizational "wall" that is supposed to separate the newsroom from corporate management. Sulzberger has spent more than a decade staffing the Times news/editorial department with the most superficial, mediocre propagandists in the industry. Arthur "Punch" Sulzberger Sr. was a World War II Marine who served in the Pacific. He was a traditional liberal and a businessman. "Pinch" was a draft dodger, a trust-fund hippie and a Vietnam protester. He has turned the most august newspaper in the world into a cheap, embarrassing political pamphlet. His lame business practices have sent the Times Company on a course with fiscal disaster.
The whole rest of the U.S. establishment news media would not make a pimple on Judith Miller's ass.
182
posted on
11/02/2006 10:04:51 PM PST
by
Brad from Tennessee
(Anything a politician gives you he has first stolen from you)
To: jveritas
183
posted on
11/02/2006 10:05:46 PM PST
by
centexan
(Welcome back 4th ID - Go 1st Cav - happy hunting)
To: waimea.man
I mean I will call up Rush show if he is going to talk about this subject and explain to him the very important findings in these documents, of course if I get through...
184
posted on
11/02/2006 10:06:09 PM PST
by
jveritas
(Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
To: maine-iac7
Thanks for the reminder of e.d.hill@foxnews.com , will add now.
It doesn't take all that much time to send singly and if more FReepers would take that time our message would get out.
185
posted on
11/02/2006 10:07:15 PM PST
by
jazusamo
(DIANA IREY for Congress, PA 12th District: Retire murtha.)
To: no dems
I hope that the President will address this head on. The truth is on his and our side.
186
posted on
11/02/2006 10:07:28 PM PST
by
jveritas
(Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
To: jveritas
There must be a reason, i.e., hidden agenda, as to why the NYT released this report now. I can't believe that they would believe foolishly that this would harm Bush. Maybe the WH was getting ready to release it or some other damaging information prior to Tuesday. Whatever the motivation, the NYT has validated the documents.
187
posted on
11/02/2006 10:08:28 PM PST
by
kabar
To: jveritas
I mean I will call up Rush show if he is going to talk about this subject and explain to him the very important findings in these documents, of course if I get through... And also tell him about how Scott Shane earlier interviewed you, but dismissed the documents. That's a great angle to this story.
To: Danae
Thank you very much Danae. I shall write a more detailed article on the most important things I found not only on WMD issues but also about Saddam regime very strong relation with terrorism including the infamous meeting his Intelligence service has with Osama Bin Laden. It is all in the documents.
189
posted on
11/02/2006 10:09:56 PM PST
by
jveritas
(Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
To: waimea.man
Forgive me but, who is Scott Shane?
190
posted on
11/02/2006 10:10:45 PM PST
by
no dems
(Duncan Hunter for Prez / Tony Snow for VEEP in '08)
To: Brad from Tennessee
I know that everything that you say about Miller is true, but I still don't get her involvement in the warning that Muslim finacial group that they were about to be raided. I always thought that her refusal to testify in the Muslim terrorist support case caused her harsh treatment in case against Rove.
191
posted on
11/02/2006 10:11:18 PM PST
by
Eva
To: jveritas
You may also wish to send your article to Kean and Hamilton of the 9/11 Commission as well as to Senator Pat Roberts and Rep Pete Hoekstra.
192
posted on
11/02/2006 10:12:55 PM PST
by
kabar
To: jveritas; All
If he doesn't know your name now he will by morning. ; )
I sent e-mails to all those media links. Everybody else do it too. Just give them the title of the thread (I put it in the subject line and repeated it in the body) and copy and paste the URL of this thread. It's more than enough to get their attention. FReep those inboxes!
193
posted on
11/02/2006 10:14:31 PM PST
by
TigersEye
("Everywhere I go there's a Predator in tow, life goes on without me!")
To: waimea.man
194
posted on
11/02/2006 10:15:45 PM PST
by
jveritas
(Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
To: no dems
Forgive me but, who is Scott Shane? He is a reporter for the NYT who wrote about the documents back in March.
To: CedarDave; jveritas
What is important in this whole issue is that the New York Times has ridiculed these documents all along and never payed attention to them including the very important documents that show Saddam regime never stopped its programs related to WMD including nuclear programs. These documents were translated and posted here on FR.The NYTimes just gave credibility to all of the documents that Joseph translated here on FR! And there are some HUGE discoveries--like the March 11(?)2001 document that called out Iraqi Pilots for suicide missions against American interests!
The NYTimes hoped they opened a can of worms in their zeal to "get Bush", instead they seem to have opened a can of "whoop a**"--Bush style.
They are going to wish they never printed their story. No matter how badly their missive was worded, the perception will be "Saddam Hussein had nuclear weapons" and the NYTimes is verifying it. John and Jane Q. Public aren't going to get into the complexities of the argument, they are going to see that Saddam had the "blueprints", our troops captured them, they were put on the internet, and they are real and dangerous, but bottom line will be: "Saddam could have a nuke within a year."
What a November Surprise!
196
posted on
11/02/2006 10:16:16 PM PST
by
Shelayne
(...And though my heart is torn, I will praise You in this storm... ~~Casting Crowns)
To: Repub4bush
Someone send this to John Ziegler too. He's beeen having so much fun with the Kerry that he broke this will be the icing on the cake.
To: no dems
He is the New York Times reporter who wrote this latest article and another one on March 28 2006 where he dismissed the values of these Iraqi documents.
198
posted on
11/02/2006 10:16:59 PM PST
by
jveritas
(Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
To: Petronski
Someone close to the EIB microphone has posted on this very thread. Be assured, Rush has it. And if Rush has it, the world has it tomorrow.
To: waimea.man
200
posted on
11/02/2006 10:17:43 PM PST
by
no dems
(Duncan Hunter for Prez / Tony Snow for VEEP in '08)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180, 181-200, 201-220 ... 501-512 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson