Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 last
To: West Coast Conservative
Bush didn't lie!!! Bush didn't lie!!!
122 posted on
11/02/2006 7:57:46 PM PST by
Hattie
To: West Coast Conservative
To: West Coast Conservative
So the NYTimes is saying Saddam was close to building a nuke in 2002?
This is like terrorists blowing themselves up while planting an IED!
HA!
139 posted on
11/02/2006 8:10:43 PM PST by
DTogo
(I haven't left the GOP, the GOP left me.)
To: West Coast Conservative
A lot of you are saying that the NYT's position has been that Saddam NEVER had a nuke program. I always thought that most lefties admit that he did have one in the 90s, but was dismantled before 2003, is that wrong?
140 posted on
11/02/2006 8:10:58 PM PST by
scsscs
To: West Coast Conservative
For the U.S. to toss a match into this flammable area is very irresponsible, said A. Bryan Siebert, a former director of classification at the federal Department of Energy, which runs the nations nuclear arms program. Theres a lot of things about nuclear weapons that are secret and should remain so. Perhaps Mr. Siebert should have passed this brainstorm on to Krintong. He didn't seem to understand the concept.
142 posted on
11/02/2006 8:13:45 PM PST by
blake6900
(THIS SPACE FOR RENT)
To: West Coast Conservative
The director of national intelligence, John D. Negroponte, had resisted setting up the Web site, which some intelligence officials felt implicitly raised questions about the competence and judgment of government analysts. But President Bush approved the sites creation after Congressional Republicans proposed legislation to force the documents release. And this is why the Times has reported this story in the way they've reported it. These documents were all part of the documents that proved what the president had been saying all along about Iraq's quest for WMD.
First the Times says there were no reasons to go to war. The administraton and GOP says, "Yes, there were and we have the documents to prove it." Then the documents to prove it are shown and now the Times says it was irresponsible for the administration to show the proof.
Typical liberal argument. But too little, too late. The idea that Bush is responsible for Iran's future ability to produce a nuclear weapon is such a reach ti's laughable particularly since the website posting the documents has only been up since March of this year.
147 posted on
11/02/2006 8:24:38 PM PST by
blake6900
(THIS SPACE FOR RENT)
To: West Coast Conservative
The recent inquiries regarding Face Pelosi's whereabouts will soon be addressed.
|
|
|
To: West Coast Conservative
Geeze. Guess the NYTimes thinks we would believe anything they published.
156 posted on
11/02/2006 8:34:21 PM PST by
Dustbunny
(The BIBLE - Basic Instructions Before Leaving Earth)
To: West Coast Conservative
BTTT, BOOKMARKING, and LET'S ROLL!
165 posted on
11/02/2006 8:46:51 PM PST by
Chena
("I'm not young enough to know everything." (Oscar Wilde))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson