Schiavo issue haunts Crist

St. Petersburg Times ^ | November 1, 2006 | ADAM C. SMITH

[8mmMauser]

As the left continues to obfuscate by mixing embryonic and adult stem cell research and success, this success emerges on a thread by wagglebee.

In research being carried out at University College London Hospital and Barts and the London NHS, Patients suffering a heart attack will undergo regular treatment of an angioplasty to remove blockage to an artery, and then will receive an injection into the artery of stem cells harvested from the bone marrow in their hip, under local anesthetic. The whole procedure will take place within five hours of their attack.

Adult Stem Cells Used to Treat Emergency Heart Attack Patients

8mm

[8mmMauser]

And this, also from wagglebee...

WASHINGTON, November 8, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Moments after the hearing of oral arguments in the partial-birth abortion case before the United States Supreme Court today, a pro-life lawyer involved in the case is predicting a "major victory". Jay Sekulow, Chief Counsel for the American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ), said that he is convinced the ban on partial birth abortion will be ruled constitutional.

Supreme Court Partial Birth Abortion Case - "I'm Convinced Kennedy will vote with Us"

8mm

[wagglebee]

The left simply uses the generic term "stem cells" and makes no distinction between embryonic and adult/umbilical cord stem cells. As a result, much of the public is uninformed when they are told that the pro-life movement is opposed to "stem cell" research.

[8mmMauser]

Without muddling the terms, something for which the left is gifted, they wouldn't have much of a case. But that is how they catch the unaware.

[T'wit]

>> How would you term the action taken by the Congress regarding the Schiavo case?

Congressional enforcement of federal guarantees of the rights of life, liberty and property, per Section 1 of the 14th Amendment, by authority of Section 5: "The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article."

One should say, "attempted" enforcement, since the effort was nullified by the judicial branch and had no effect whatsoever on the case. Congress indisputably had the constitutional authority to act, so that's not an issue. Nothing actually came of it, so that's not an issue either. But shame on the judiciary for butting in, and more shame on the judiciary for taking away an innocent citizen's basic rights!

This 1865 lithograph, accompanying an article on the 14th Amendment (ratified in 1868), conveys that freed slaves were now U.S. citizens with all the rights and privileges of citizenship, and that no state could lawfully deprive any individual of life, liberty and property.

If you wish to call it "intervention," that doesn't change the fact that it did not delay the court-ordered death of an American citizen by one minute. "Intervention" is the wrong word because it is meant to deceive. It hides the history of the litigation and leaves the false impression that the feds were gratuitously butting into a private matter. But it wasn't a private matter and Michael Schiavo himself initiated government intervention in 1998 -- seven years earlier!

Law School dean Gary Amos was so outraged by judicial misbehavior throughout the case that he stated that, apart from two or three dissents, every single judge involved including all nine sitting members of the Supreme Court, "must" be impeached.

Prof. Amos's essay is linked at #199 above. See also this forcefully argued dissent by Judge Wilson in the 11th Circuit: Judge Wilson's "strong" dissent (see pages 11 through 21)

[bjs1779]

"We" doesn't compute.

I used the term "we" as in "nation", not "we" meaning you or I. "We" won WW11.

[T'wit]

>> Congress "came between" the courts and the parties, or at least attempted to do so.

The intervention was earlier, when the courts "came between" Terri Schiavo and her rights, so to speak. Congress merely authorized the courts to review the case de novo. In Judge Wilson's words, "The entire purpose for the statute was to give the federal courts an opportunity to consider the merits of Plaintiffs' constitutional claims with a fresh set of eyes."

[T'wit]

No argument. But I still can't quite believe that "we" as a country deserve grief due to the immoral actions of some individuals. Edmund Burke made that very point, as did one of my favorite mentors, Albert Jay Nock, in "The Myth of a Guilty Nation." Otoh, Jefferson agreed with your point when he said somewhere (beware: quotation from memory :-) ), "I tremble for my country when I consider that God is just."

[T'wit]

Meanwhile, I hope you caught that Wilson dissent linked above. You were, after all, the one who remembered it :-) I'd never seen it, but a friend dug it out after you mentioned it.

Same friend wonders if you could find that illegal Greer order to deny Terri oral hydration and nutrition? You have a knack for finding things.

[bjs1779]

I would probably make the same remark in 1939 Germany. I do tend to look at it from what I think God might think I admit. It's biblical on how God sees nations. Often times I don't enter the whole equation in what I say, but be assured that 30 million babies killed since 1973 is in there.

[bjs1779]

Same friend wonders if you could find that illegal Greer order to deny Terri oral hydration and nutrition?

That might have to wait until tomorrow. If someone wants to hunt it down tonight, make sure you show his previous rulings and how it suddenly changed in his last order.

[T'wit]

>> 30 million babies killed since 1973 is in there.

I agree, just as sadly. I'm afraid the figure is significantly higher now. Or anyway, I usually see figures like forty or forty-five million. That would put this country's abortion industry way ahead of Hitler and Stalin in the extermination business, and second only to Mao Tse-tung.

[T'wit]

>> ...make sure you show his previous rulings and how it suddenly changed in his last order.

Good point!

[8mmMauser]

Time might prove me wrong. But when I notice the same descriptives coming repeatedly in the same time frame from different sources, I am alert as this is a technique we have seen before when the left and allies build new terms for their pet topics. We know the left uses words as tools to effect actions and not necessarily for their intrinsic meanings. If it disappears, I admit to being wrong, if it repeats, perhaps I am right. Not a big issue with me, just one more shred to consider.

[8mmMauser]

...and other pandering (e.g., the Terri Schiavo intervention)

This phrase alerted me. You see, the article with the phrase reading like a Ludlam title saturated the news media yesterday, and is there again today in multiples.

Punished for apostasy

8mm

[T'wit]

I am less forgiving. The word "intervention" itself was false, as was the claim that Republicans in Congress had no business butting in and were merely pandering to religious nuts. This was unrelieved propaganda that buried every distinction under a foot of mud. Obviously it worked. We watched the Democrats spin it every day. You linked stories from scores of congressional campaigns, many of them earlier in this very thread.

They all bore false witness, they intended to, and they did it for political gain. I think we may say of these people what Prof Amos said of the judges: they made themselves accomplices in murder.

[8mmMauser]

The Terri Factor anew? Is this a crucial reason for rejecting a presidential candidate, a right to die kill?

Nashville landscaper Michael Bernard, 55, said Frist lost his support for a possible run for president when he weighed in on the right-to-die case of Terri Schiavo.

"Some of his statements were way off base. He's just too conservative," Bernard said.

Exit poll cool to Frist as White House hopeful

8mm

[8mmMauser]

More from Thomas Sowell...(Repeat from earlier, but renewed today)

Remember how absolutely certain the mainstream media were that Terri Schiavo was for all practical purposes already dead because she had been classified as being in a "vegetative" state?

Just recently, a woman in a "vegetative" state was discovered by scientists to be able to respond to statements. But have you heard anything about it, much less anything about its relevance to Schiavo?

Last in A 4 Part Series: More Ways The Media Affect Elections

8mm