Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Landlord penalties are spelled out(Renting to Illegals)
San Diego Union ^ | 30 Sept 2006 | J. Harry Jones

Posted on 09/30/2006 9:14:20 AM PDT by radar101

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

1 posted on 09/30/2006 9:14:21 AM PDT by radar101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: radar101

I've said it before and I'll say it again..there is no need for a fence at the border..simply make the illegals pay for medical care, pay for school, not be able to collect SS, no drivers licenses, make it illegal to rent to them, pay tax (heavy) on money sent back to mexico, i.e. deny them all the benefits they get when they come here..they'll voluntarily go back..IMHO..


2 posted on 09/30/2006 9:20:45 AM PDT by GeorgiaDawg32 (I'm a Patriot Guard Rider..www.patriotguard.org for info)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radar101

How it works: Mex-American buys house in subdivision. Lives there short while - rents it out to the illegal who uses the house as a way station or dormitorie. Buyer has several of these homes. A sea of such houses have cropped up in south Tucson…………Also, Mex-American family buys house and rents rooms to illegal aliens – where are the developers and city planning in the mix…………….


3 posted on 09/30/2006 9:23:35 AM PDT by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeorgiaDawg32

We also need the Voter ID act passed at the federal level and an AZ style Prop 200.


4 posted on 09/30/2006 9:23:46 AM PDT by umgud (I love NASCAR as much as the Democrats hate Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: radar101

Another point: Is there a surfeit of low-income housing in Escondido? If not, why shouldn't citizens get the first crack at it?


5 posted on 09/30/2006 9:24:00 AM PDT by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radar101
Is it legal to evict someone in five days there?

Takes two months in VA.

6 posted on 09/30/2006 9:25:46 AM PDT by patton (Sanctimony frequently reaps its own reward.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeorgiaDawg32

I agree. And stop allowing children of illegals being immediate US citizens woukd help.


7 posted on 09/30/2006 9:25:49 AM PDT by BunnySlippers (Never Forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GeorgiaDawg32
I've said it before and I'll say it again..there is no need for a fence at the border

Why don't we put a 1300-mile welcome mat alongside the border while we're at it too.

simply make the illegals pay for medical care, pay for school, not be able to collect SS, no drivers licenses, make it illegal to rent to them, pay tax (heavy) on money sent back to mexico

Build a fence and you don't have to worry about enacting the other policies, as they wouldn't be here in the first place. Duh...

8 posted on 09/30/2006 9:28:47 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yoe

"How it works: Mex-American buys house in subdivision. Lives there short while - rents it out to the illegal who uses the house as a way station or dormitorie. Buyer has several of these homes. A sea of such houses have cropped up in south Tucson…………Also, Mex-American family buys house and rents rooms to illegal aliens – where are the developers and city planning in the mix……………."

Yup. Add into that the mortgage lenders and banks see selling mortgages to illegals as the exciting new frontier, I see the pressure for illegal housing being eased in the home sale market - which is looking for the next wave of suckers to pay the inflated prices. Flippers will most likely start targeting this market, if they havent already.

There's already a problem in the rental market with illegals renting a property, trashing it, and disapearing in the night. They will do the same with housing, but it will be worse, because good solid social security numbers with healthy credit attached will become gold in the underground, and innocent tax payers will find the new burden illegals impose on us - foreclosures.

Illegals jump at any chance to screw over gringos. They will do this with pleasure, and trash house after house after house, destroying neighborhoods and bringing gang problems and drugs and crime into every corner of the country.


9 posted on 09/30/2006 9:32:12 AM PDT by ByDesign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: radar101

If they pass this ordinance then the city needs to provide an office for landlords to come to vet their tennants. Otherwise this ordinance shifts an unfair burden on the landlord. Is it really the landlord's duty to enforce the immigration laws?


10 posted on 09/30/2006 9:36:41 AM PDT by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeorgiaDawg32
I've said it before and I'll say it again..there is no need for a fence at the border..simply make the illegals pay for medical care, pay for school, not be able to collect SS, no drivers licenses, make it illegal to rent to them, pay tax (heavy) on money sent back to mexico, i.e. deny them all the benefits they get when they come here..they'll voluntarily go back..IMHO..

Do ALL that...and build the fence anyway. It's not just to keep the Illegals out, it's for National Security also. We are at war, you know.

Go Dawgs...Cox or Stafford today?

11 posted on 09/30/2006 9:38:52 AM PDT by citizen (Yo W! Read my lips: No Amnistia by any name! And the White House has a fence around it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: radar101
Mexican fertility is higher than that of whites, of course! But Mexican fertility CLIMBS SUBSTANTIALLY after they cross the border.

Border crossing makes 'em horny..?

No. The births are FREE (on us), and they can put them on THE DOLE (on us). They also serve as anchors.

So basically the segment of society that detests education and sucks the public coffers dry multiplies most quickly.

A formula for DISASTER.

12 posted on 09/30/2006 9:41:56 AM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radar101

"documentation of a tenant's immigration status."
Just what is that? Does any government issue this documentation?
If it issues it, it MUST issue it for ALL people regardless of the language spoken.
If this becomes a law, a property owner MUST get the documentation from ALL prospective tenants.
This is stupid and wrong because:
It is an attempt to shift the burden of enforcement from the government to someone else, complete with penalties.
It would force the property owner to find out the legal status of a prospective tenant.
There is no "document" of legal status for ALL people. Those who were born in the USA can obtain a birth certificate, which is not proof of legal status, since there is no way to correlate the birth certificate with a specific individual.
The government is not doing its job and is trying to dump its responsibility onto property owners.


13 posted on 09/30/2006 9:43:30 AM PDT by Leftism is Mentally Deranged (American Left, Islamic Fascism, Mainstream Media = ideology of nihilism, despair, nothingness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe

"A sea of such houses have cropped up in south Tucson…………"

Tucson? That's a given yoe....Heck, they have the same problem on Long Island. It's literally everywhere now.


14 posted on 09/30/2006 9:45:19 AM PDT by Bogtrotter52 (Reading DU daily so you won't hafta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: radar101
"Such an ordinance is likely to put landlords between a rock and a hard place"....ACLU quote!

OK....Everybody who believes that is the ACLU's primary concern....step to the front of the cantina!

15 posted on 09/30/2006 9:48:32 AM PDT by JimVT (Oh, the days of the Kerry dancing, Oh, the ring of the piper's tune)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeorgiaDawg32

It's much easier (and in the long run cheaper) to build a fence. Getting the laws you want enacted would take years. There also are security issues that a fence/wall would satisfy.


16 posted on 09/30/2006 9:48:54 AM PDT by BW2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: patton

I'm a property manger in Ohio and I was wondering about that also.


17 posted on 09/30/2006 9:49:15 AM PDT by muggs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: GeorgiaDawg32
"I've said it before and I'll say it again..there is no need for a fence at the border..simply make the illegals pay for medical care, pay for school, not be able to collect SS, no drivers licenses, make it illegal to rent to them, pay tax (heavy) on money sent back to mexico, i.e. deny them all the benefits they get when they come here..they'll voluntarily go back..IMHO.."

Well, on the whole, I'd have to agree. However, I'd also like to see the US make it a felony, punishable by a one-year mandatory minimum prison sentence, to provide an illegal with employment, and/or to any taxpayer funded service (medical, education, and the like). The US should also deny citizenship to "anchor babies," cut all tax breaks for any church that harbors and illegal, and stop all federal assistance to any state or city that designates themselves as a "haven" for illegals. I'd also like the fence, just to help cut down on drug trafficking and make it tougher for terrorist to cross.
18 posted on 09/30/2006 9:51:04 AM PDT by RavenATB (Patton was right...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit

Exactly.


19 posted on 09/30/2006 9:51:27 AM PDT by muggs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: radar101
In 1994, California voters passed Proposition 187 by a vote of 59 percent to 41 percent. The measure attempted to prevent illegal immigrants from receiving benefits or public services. But after two rounds of litigation in the federal courts, nearly all of its provisions were invalidated.

Why should there have even been a vote on this? Compassion is one thing, but providing services that the home country will not is asking for trouble and is not sustainable.

20 posted on 09/30/2006 9:59:20 AM PDT by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson