Skip to comments.
New supernova discovery defies theory
MSNBC.com ^
| Sept 20, 2006
| Sara Goudarzi
Posted on 09/20/2006 6:40:57 PM PDT by annie laurie
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 last
To: Verginius Rufus
Do you mean when I look at deep space objects with my Meade 10" Schmidt-Cassagrain, I am really looking into the past?
Before I was born! Before my ancestry became farmers. Wow!
Does it beat watching Johnny Carson in reruns? (Joking!)
41
posted on
09/20/2006 10:10:03 PM PDT
by
Prost1
(Fair and Unbiased as always!)
To: Coyoteman
Sorry, no. Science is based on facts and well-supported theory (see definitions, above). So in your unbiased opinion, religion cannot be based on fact. I think you may need to rethink your definition of the word faith.
42
posted on
09/20/2006 10:17:28 PM PDT
by
LifeOrGoods?
(God is not a God of fear, but of power, love and a sane mind.)
To: Prost1
If you were on a planet circling Vega and had the right technology to pick up the broadcasts, you could be watching the original Johnny Carson shows.
Viewers on a planet circling Sirius would just recently have heard the name Monica Lewinsky for the first time and are placing bets on how quickly Clinton will be forced to resign.
To: annie laurie
I guess they don't really know very much.
To: Coyoteman
Belief: any cognitive content (perception) held as true; religious faith. Do you believe the cognitive content of that definition, and if so, does that belief constitute religious faith?
Cordially,
45
posted on
09/21/2006 8:20:10 AM PDT
by
Diamond
To: annie laurie
Don't you hate it when you discover your favorite tool is way out of calibration.
To: annie laurie
Let's see if we can figure out what this is actually about.
47
posted on
09/21/2006 8:23:45 AM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
To: annie laurie
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14924959/
Super-Chandrasekhar-masses should occur preferentially in young stellar populations, the researchers write.
SNLS-03D3bb comes from a pack of young stars in a distant galaxy when the universe was much younger than it is today. The color of young stars and their host galaxies are generally blue. This, in addition to other methods, is how scientists determined the age of the star.
Not so far from theory, is it?
48
posted on
09/21/2006 8:28:52 AM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
To: Coyoteman; Urbane_Guerilla
"Darwinist" is a false and libelous, as well as disrespectful term generally used only by religious fundamentalists to describe those who have studied or espouse the scientific theory of evolution."
That is BS coyote, darwinist is a more correct term to describe believers in darwin's theory than your term of creationist for believers in intelligent design. Evolutionist is similar to "pro-choice" in being a BS term. Evolution occurs all the time just not the way darwin described it.
49
posted on
09/21/2006 8:32:59 AM PDT
by
razzle
(darwinism is a joke)
To: Coyoteman; Urbane_Guerilla
A Darwinist is a Mohammedan without religion. You got the cajones to go to Saudi and teach the Theory of Evolution?
They are closely related to Marxists and Freudians,
This is a disgusting libel; you should be ashamed of yourself.
but have nothing at all to do with Reaganites.
some of us are in fact Reaganites. Again, a disgusting, shamworthy libel.
50
posted on
09/21/2006 10:27:55 AM PDT
by
Virginia-American
(What do you call an honest creationist? An evolutionist.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson