Posted on 09/07/2006 4:12:34 PM PDT by Mo1
We ALL need to spend a day on the phone/ sending e-mails to get the attention it needs.
is that supposed to make us feel better, or are you telling us to really give it up?
.
EXCELLENT letters. You GO!
Oh wow......let me think on that one.
Yes - what they edited had to do with Sandy Berger after he called them and complained. It's in an article.
And they actually BELIEVED the convicted Document Stuffer.
NICE catch and I'm going to give it a bump...great context Peach.
No I don't have those anymore but we can find them tomorrow.
This is unprecedented. Obviously these people only believe in free speech if it is speech they agree with. I don't think I've ever seen such a flagrant violation of the first amendment.
Surely someone could buy a few dozen copies and donate them to the MSM! ;^)
I saw the same thing....amazing isn't it??
We have two different people on the same 9/11 Commission telling diametrically opposite stories....BUT, we also have Mansour Ijaz, and Clinton himself saying that he was "handed" Bin Ladin.
I can't imagine Tom Kean Sr. getting involved in this project and defending it like it is....if it is ALL LIES....like the Clintons, the dems, and Roemer are saying..NOW.
BTW..Old Friend, I heard Tom Kean, Jr. on with Sean today...I feel sorry for you....having to choose between him and Robert Menendez....YIKES.
They SHOULD be able to air such a program over the screams of "impropriety" and WITHOUT any hint of intimidation from the US Congress.
This letter constitutes a CLEAR and UNAMBIGUOUS assault on the First Amendment. That Amendment was designed to prevent goverment interference in the content of publications (broadcasts) without some overwhelming need to protect the public...such as screaming "fire" in a crowded theatre.
The signtories of the letter should be prosecuted under whatever law offers the most extreme penalty.
From Drudge:
NYT REVIEW OF ABC 9-11 MOVIE
Thu Sep 07 2006 19:52:02 ET
NEW YORK TIMES TV critic Alessandra Stanley reviews ABC's upcoming 'The Path to 9/11' in Friday editions, newsroom sources tell DRUDGE.
"'The Path to 9/11' is not a documentary, or even a docu-drama; it is a fictionalized account of what took place. It relies on the report of the Sept. 11 commission, the King James version of all Sept. 11 accounts, as well as other material and memoirs. Some scenes come straight from the writers' imaginations," writes Alessandra .
"Dramatic license was certainly taken, but blame is spread pretty evenly across the board. It's not the inaccuracies of 'The Path to 9/11' that make ABC's miniseries so upsetting. It's the situation on the ground in Afghanistan now."
Alessandra concludes: "Hindsight is heartbreaking and disturbing to watch, even in a made-for-television movie. But it's even harder to take when those steps continue to contaminate the present."
Developing...
It all boils down to what was in Sandy Burglar's pants. I believe he didn't get everything, he knows he didn't get everything, and all the clintinoids know he didn't get everything -- and they are scared whit-less that someone with power to tell all, will blab about what he wasn't able to smuggle out in his PANTS!
You mean the Senate #'s and emails??
Do they work on Mondays, Tuesdays, Wednesdays or Thursdays?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.