Pro-Integration Corporations Should Not Be Shaping Canada's Economic Policy

Vive le Canada ^ | August 15, 2006 | Meera Karunananthan

[1rudeboy]

Are you the keeper of the Canadian ping list?

[hedgetrimmer]

Your group, www.cadanianally.com, is clearly in favor of the integration of Canada with the US, and PARROTS the globalist agenda in its mission statement.

In line with Canada's national interests, the Statement outlines a targeted, multi-year, strategic approach focused on five interrelated priorities:

REVITALIZING Canada's North American partnership with the United States and Mexico by enhancing security and promoting prosperity;

BUILDING a more secure world by countering terrorism, stabilizing failed and fragile states, and combatting the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction;

INCREASING domestic and global prosperity by strengthening Canada's competitiveness, enhancing international commercial engagement with key partners, and providing targeted services and support for Canadian businesses;

PROMOTING good governance by sharing Canadian expertise to reform global governance and enhance local capacity; and CRAFTING a new flexible diplomacy to deal with global developments

Globalese, using the UN style-writing guide.

No siree bob, there are no INDEPENDENT CONSERVATIVES supporting national sovereignty in your organization, not at all.

[1rudeboy]

Don't be so sure. If that website is maintained by the Canadian Embassy in D.C., presumably it speaks for the Harper Governement.

Meanwhile, as of August 12th, Prime Minister Harper launches Operation LANCASTER to assert Canadian sovereignty in the Arctic. I detect the usual amount of cognitive dissonance on your part.

[1rudeboy]

Governement = Government

[Toddsterpatriot]

I detect the usual amount of cognitive dissonance on your part.

Wouldn't that require cognition first?

[1rudeboy]

Noting that Canada’s sovereignty in the Arctic is recognized by 150 countries that have ratified the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Prime Minister Harper said the federal government is undertaking numerous measures to enforce Canada’s control over the Arctic. [emphasis added]

It's a plot.

[Toddsterpatriot]

It's a plot.

Great, now Jerome Corsi has the outline of his next book.

[hedgetrimmer]

Funny you should bring that up. Canada has a funny way of asserting its 'sovereignty'.

As sailors and soldiers made ready to return home from a major Arctic sovereignty operation, a small military plane remained stuck in the mud on a bluff overlooking the Northwest Passage waiting for rescue or winter, whichever comes first.

Four Inuit reservists were ordered to stand guard nearby to protect the Twin Otter from polar bears,

[Tolerance Sucks Rocks]

Yeah, only left-wing communists could oppose the integration of the three nations into a semi-socialist superstate! /s

[Tolerance Sucks Rocks]

So, opposing the SPP and NAU are xenophobic actions?

[Toddsterpatriot]

Yeah, only left-wing communists could oppose the integration of the three nations into a semi-socialist superstate

Lots of people oppose lots of things. Hedgetrimmer seems to always post the left wing side of the argument. I really like it when she posts from Communist organizations.

Ask her about CISPES.

[hedgetrimmer]

1rudeboy seems to always post the left wing side of the argument-- the socialist government of Canada, for instance.

[1rudeboy]

Listen, if you do not follow Canadian politics, I completely understand. I should warn you that some here do.

[hedgetrimmer]

I should warn you that some here do.

Great! Then they should be able to name the ten corporate executives appointed to the NACC at a meeting of North American leaders in Cancun, Mexico this past March....whose North American Security and Prosperity Initiative led to the signing of the SPP by Canada, Mexico and the U.S. in March 2005. Because we would ALL like to know.

I am sure too, they can tell us whether the citizens of Canada have had a voice in this, and what percentage of Canadians support it.

[fanfan]

Canadians opinion wanted.

Canada ping.

Please send me a FReepmail to get on or off this Canada ping list.

[Toddsterpatriot]

the socialist government of Canada, for instance.

Poor hedgetrimmer.

[1rudeboy]

Then they should be able to name the ten corporate executives appointed to the NACC at a meeting of North American leaders in Cancun, Mexico this past March.

There is a link to all of the NACC members near the bottom of this webpage. I cannot open it since the computer I am working on does not have Adobe installed. Took me all of ten seconds to find.

[hedgetrimmer]

Your link doesn't name the ten corporate executives appointed to the NACC.

[1rudeboy]

What does it name, the corporations?

[1rudeboy]

Seeing that the NACC was officially launched just over a month ago, it's entirely possible that the ten members have not been chosen.