Skip to comments.
USS Grunion: Lost submarine found off Alaska
The Seattle P-I (Newspaper) ^
| 8/18/06
| RALPH RANALLI
Posted on 08/18/2006 4:55:24 AM PDT by llevrok
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
The other day, the Wahoo was found. Now the Grunion.
God continue to save the souls at rest.
1
posted on
08/18/2006 4:55:25 AM PDT
by
llevrok
2
posted on
08/18/2006 4:58:08 AM PDT
by
csvset
("It was like the hand of G_d slapping down and smashing everything." ~ JDAM strikes Taliban)
To: llevrok
I served on a United States submarine. It is a fate you always think about while you are at sea. God Bless them all.
3
posted on
08/18/2006 4:58:39 AM PDT
by
bmwcyle
(Only stupid people would vote for McCain, Warner, Hagle, Snowe, Graham, or any RINO)
To: llevrok
This story has "movie" written all over it.
4
posted on
08/18/2006 4:59:24 AM PDT
by
shezza
(God bless our military heroes)
To: llevrok
U.S.S. Grunion - Still on Patrol.
5
posted on
08/18/2006 5:04:15 AM PDT
by
commish
(Freedom tastes sweetest to those who have fought to protect it.)
To: llevrok
If I were Bush I would order the Navy to go out and investigate the site for God sakes. The Navy should be more then willing to bring closure to the loss of their own boat and crew from battle.
This is just pathetic of the US Navy.
6
posted on
08/18/2006 5:07:54 AM PDT
by
AZRepublican
("The degree in which a measure is necessary can never be a test of the legal right to adopt it.")
To: llevrok
People actually were on a Grunion hunt! Rest in Peace, brave sailors.
7
posted on
08/18/2006 5:19:44 AM PDT
by
NonValueAdded
(Tom Gallagher - the anti-Crist [FL Governor, 2006 primary])
To: AZRepublican
You, sir, not knowing what the Navy REALLY knows or is REALLY doing, are the one who's pathetic for making the statement...
"This is just pathetic of the US Navy." Anyone taking the mainstream media's facts - as printed - is extremely pathetic.
8
posted on
08/18/2006 5:23:05 AM PDT
by
harpu
( "...it's better to be hated for who you are than loved for someone you're not!")
To: harpu
oops;
"...are the one who's pathetic..." should read; "is the one who's pathetic..."
9
posted on
08/18/2006 5:25:34 AM PDT
by
harpu
( "...it's better to be hated for who you are than loved for someone you're not!")
To: llevrok
"Lord God, our power evermore,
Whose arm doth reach the ocean floor,
Dive with our men beneath the sea;
Traverse the depths protectively.
O hear us when we pray, and keep
Them safe from peril in the deep."
To: harpu
You, sir, not knowing what the Navy REALLY knows or is REALLY doing, are the one who's pathetic for making the statement... "This is just pathetic of the US Navy."
I think after the passage of 64 years we can pretty much confirm the fact the US Navy knows nothing. Now, what is holding them back from bringing closure to this lost sub and its crew? Nothing! It won't break them to send a explorer ship to confirm the sonar.
11
posted on
08/18/2006 5:33:21 AM PDT
by
AZRepublican
("The degree in which a measure is necessary can never be a test of the legal right to adopt it.")
To: commish
Nicely said.
12
posted on
08/18/2006 5:34:20 AM PDT
by
Vision
(God did not give us a spirit of timidity, but a spirit of power, love and self-discipline 2Timothy1)
To: AZRepublican
We are in the era of "Do more with less", so our Naval resources have alot more to worry about first. They may help with recovery, but it is important that this needs to be verified first. SONAR images are usually pretty reliable, but remember that it still could be just about anything down there. Let's not condemn our U.S. Navy until it is prudent to. Also keep in mind the logistical hazards of the location and the dangers to those involved in any recovery.
13
posted on
08/18/2006 5:36:29 AM PDT
by
SteelCurtain_SSN720
(If you pass the rabid child, say "hammer down" for me)
To: AZRepublican
The Navy can't go tearing-around every time a private citizen makes sonar contact with some wreckage. And (attempting not to be morbid) there is no reason to attempt the recovery of the bodies, as they are considered to be at rest (unlike those of, say, a soldier in the field).
14
posted on
08/18/2006 5:42:49 AM PDT
by
1rudeboy
To: SteelCurtain_SSN720
A Marine would risk a hail of fire to go back in search of fellow lost Marines. A dirty shame the Navy does not feel the same way.
15
posted on
08/18/2006 5:43:53 AM PDT
by
AZRepublican
("The degree in which a measure is necessary can never be a test of the legal right to adopt it.")
To: Syncro
16
posted on
08/18/2006 5:45:17 AM PDT
by
seeker41
To: 1rudeboy
It was SteelCurtain_SSN720 who sugested recovery, not I. I merely questioned why the Navy would not attempt to verify the site as being the wreckage of the sub.
17
posted on
08/18/2006 5:47:00 AM PDT
by
AZRepublican
("The degree in which a measure is necessary can never be a test of the legal right to adopt it.")
To: AZRepublican
A Marine would risk a hail of fire to go back in search of fellow lost Marines. A dirty shame the Navy does not feel the same way.Burial at sea has been a naval custom (originally from necessity) since just about...FOREVER!
18
posted on
08/18/2006 5:52:33 AM PDT
by
JimRed
("Hey, hey, Teddy K., how many girls did you drown today?" (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help m)
To: AZRepublican
Really? Well, 1. The two situations are not quite the same, considering the enviornment of the search and the age of the lost ship.
2. A dirty shame the Navy does not feel the same way. You have no knowledge of what they are doing now, or what they did when she first disappeared.
3. Not trying to get into a pi$$ing match here, but YOUR arguement about Marines is moot until all POW/MIA's have been accounted for. After all, isn't that the only thing they have on their plate right now? /sarc off
19
posted on
08/18/2006 5:54:16 AM PDT
by
SteelCurtain_SSN720
(If you pass the rabid child, say "hammer down" for me)
To: AZRepublican
Have you ever heard of the term "operational need?" The Navy budget has been cut drastically. Army, Marines, and Air Force are getting the Lion's share of the budget these days. I would rather the Navy put the money into keeping today's sailors alive and into successful missions today and tomorrow. We already know that the Grunion went down with all hands. The sons of the crew are searching now, which seems very appropriate. I'm glad they have been successful.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson