Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Golitsyn Predictions
Mark Riebling ^ | 08-17-06 | Mark Riebling

Posted on 08/17/2006 6:07:20 PM PDT by brain bleeds red

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-165 next last
To: Lukasz

"Romanov... Be a man for once in your life... Show us who he is and how you learned that he is from California."

What are you about 12? What's next? A "Double-Dare"?


121 posted on 08/27/2006 12:45:18 PM PDT by Romanov (Golytsinites = "Lenin's Useful Idiots denying Reagan's Legacy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: spanalot

"If there was any doubt as to Romanov's vocation, this post dispels it."

Oh, please do tell, Spanalot - just what is my vocation???

When are you going to DENOUNCE your Ukrainian organization UNA/UNSO that has called for the killing of American troops? When? When?! Why is that so hard for you to do?

You are disloyal to America. Perhaps it's time for you to return to Lvov and your National-Socialist brothers...


122 posted on 08/27/2006 12:48:10 PM PDT by Romanov (Golytsinites = "Lenin's Useful Idiots denying Reagan's Legacy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: brain bleeds red; GarySpFc

"What I can't understand, Spanalot, is why they are trying so hard to convince others and myself that Golitsyn was a total fraud.

Either they are so deluded of their opinions, as their burnished "military" credentials speak for them, or they have more sinister motives..."

I'll put my credentials, experience, etc., versus yours and the Ukrainian Socialist-Nationalist who calls himself "Spanalot" any day of the week.

I slam Golytsin and his idolizers because he is a KGB AGENT!!! What more about that do you NOT understand? Why do you slavishly worship a false prophet? Do you really hate Ronald Reagan that much?


123 posted on 08/27/2006 12:50:59 PM PDT by Romanov (Golytsinites = "Lenin's Useful Idiots denying Reagan's Legacy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: Romanov

We all know he was a KGB agent who defected to the United States.

Is this supposed to be your best argument? Screaming that Golitsyn WAS a KGB agent?

Whether or not he was still working for them when he made his predictions is not known AT ALL. You dont know, I don't know, NOBODY knows.

So don't scream that Golitsyn was STILL a KGB agent when he DEFECTED.


124 posted on 08/27/2006 1:38:52 PM PDT by brain bleeds red
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: brain bleeds red; Romanov; Centurion2000
We all know he was a KGB agent who defected to the United States.
Is this supposed to be your best argument? Screaming that Golitsyn WAS a KGB agent?
Whether or not he was still working for them when he made his predictions is not known AT ALL. You dont know, I don't know, NOBODY knows.
So don't scream that Golitsyn was STILL a KGB agent when he DEFECTED.

Romanov has clearly shown Golitsyn's predictions were false, and they were designed to lead the CIA and Western agencies astray. And yet YOU and the other Russianphobes with your incestuous conspiracy theories hatched on thefinalphase website just cannot face the truth. By your standard of presumptive innocence if Golitsyn was not a KGB when he made his predictions, then Putin was not an agent after resigning from the KGB in 1991, but you cannot accept that, can you? So don't scream that Putin is still a KGB agent.
125 posted on 08/27/2006 6:13:28 PM PDT by GarySpFc (Jesus on Immigration, John 10:1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: spanalot
"Gazprom provides about 20% of earnings to the federal budget and supplies gas to generate around 50% of electricity in Russia. On 5th July 2006 The Lower House of the Russian parliament passed a bill making Gazprom Russia's sole exporter of natural gas."

Like the Ukraine you love is such a bastion of capitalism.

126 posted on 08/27/2006 7:58:02 PM PDT by Centurion2000 (Islam is a subsingularity memetic perversion : (http://www.orionsarm.com/topics/perversities.html))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: brain bleeds red

Let's make this perfectly clear - Golytsin is STILL A KGB AGENT. You've been duped into forsaking Americans and following a KGB thug designed to attract non-thinking Lemmings into believing his ridiculous "predictions" that he changes "ever so slightly" in sad attempts at trying to make himself appear relevant. What's next? What would you think of a Russian who believed and followed Aldrich Ames if Ames had defected?


127 posted on 08/28/2006 4:23:05 AM PDT by Romanov (Golytsinites = "Lenin's Useful Idiots denying Reagan's Legacy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Romanov

Romanov and Gary could shout from the rooftops until their voices were gone.

It doesn't change the fact that they have no PROOF that Golitsyn is still a KGB agent.

Their weak argument for Golitsyn not reneging on his past ties is that he wanted to lead the CIA and FBI "astray".

They are disinformation agents sent to smear and distort.


128 posted on 08/29/2006 6:43:50 AM PDT by brain bleeds red
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: brain bleeds red; GarySpFc

You cannot really be that delusional? You'd rather put your beliefs in the hands of a KGB agent, who was only a Major when he defected, than believe in the strength of your own country and the legacy of Ronald Reagan's victory in the Cold War. How sad. Well, how's it feel to be on the side of the KGB?


129 posted on 08/29/2006 8:33:28 AM PDT by Romanov (Golytsinites = "Lenin's Useful Idiots denying Reagan's Legacy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Romanov

This is what Romanov is reduced to. Trying to paint me as a "KGB" sider, when in reality HE is the one who still claims Golitsyn was a KGB agent.

I say Golitsyn was a KGB defector. And he was trying to help America.

Which puts me on America's side. And makes Romanov simply an idiot, which he always has been.


130 posted on 08/31/2006 1:18:38 PM PDT by brain bleeds red
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: brain bleeds red; GarySpFc

You really are desperate. Let's see - you're on America's side because you believe in a guy that set the Angleton-led CI branch of the CIA after a non-existent mole, ruined the reputations of career CIA men and women, paralyzed the CIA, and destroyed legitimate defectors? Just how in the hell does that make you "on America's side"???? Are you unable to cipher through to whom's advantage such activities would have been [hint: starts with K and ends with B]? Are you unable to grasp this simple concept? You'd be better off not chasing around a false prophet by his tail.. You look foolish - just as foolish when you were trumpeting Golytsin's laughable "successful prediction percentages."

Since you worship Golytsin would you like to tell us how Reagan did NOT win the Cold War? I'd find it interesting to read how you Golytsinites bismirch one of the greatest American presidetns...


131 posted on 08/31/2006 2:41:59 PM PDT by Romanov (Golytsinites = "Lenin's Useful Idiots denying Reagan's Legacy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Lukasz; Romanov

"One of them poses on FR as a "Polish" citizen, when in reality he's from California."

Roman ? Could you provide more informations ?


132 posted on 09/01/2006 4:58:21 AM PDT by Grzegorz 246
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Grzegorz 246

Go to their website and figure it out. It's not too terribly hard, is it? Wink Wink Nudge Nudge


133 posted on 09/01/2006 2:58:29 PM PDT by Romanov (Golytsinites = "Lenin's Useful Idiots denying Reagan's Legacy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: litehaus
My memory says our "Intel Folks" said, after WW2, that the Soviets would be TEN YEARS in getting 'the bomb.'-------I can't count to 10 between 45 and 49...........

Our intel folks were focusing on their building the Bomb, not stealing it. The Soviets can thank Klaus Fuchs and Ted Hall, at least as much as any of their own scientists, for the accelerated time table.

134 posted on 09/01/2006 3:10:36 PM PDT by ReignOfError
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Romanov; Grzegorz 246

Romanov you failed to back you claims, you are liar.


135 posted on 09/04/2006 1:55:09 PM PDT by Lukasz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Lukasz; GarySpFc

Nice try funny guy. I'm not inclined to identify the fake Pole. If you are that interested you have all the tools to figure it out yourself.


136 posted on 09/04/2006 3:08:04 PM PDT by Romanov (Golytsinites = "Lenin's Useful Idiots denying Reagan's Legacy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Romanov

Who you callin' a phony Freeper? Those are fighting words Mr. Ruski handle.


137 posted on 10/20/2006 3:34:09 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

RE: "In addition, there is the possible existence of a secret bloc headquarters staffed by senior representatives of the major communist states"

No longer a secret. It's called the Shanghai Cooperation Organization. The most dangerous World War Axis ever to arise in the history of the Earth.


138 posted on 10/20/2006 3:50:23 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Romanov

Are you yet another of the mail order bride buyers?


139 posted on 10/20/2006 3:55:12 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

As it turned out, NATO did not need to break up, for it was transformed into a clone of UN blue helmets. NATO is now a limp wristed policing force, and is no longer oriented toward strategic global war. So was Golitsyn wrong, per se? I would say not. If anything, he almost was too conservative in his assessment of how the West would overreact to Perestroika. The West's naivete must have proven to be a surprise to even him.


140 posted on 10/20/2006 4:00:21 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-165 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson