Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-29 last
To: seutonius1234
last i heard, Welfare ID was good enough...
41 posted on
08/10/2006 5:58:27 PM PDT by
Chode
(American Hedonist ©®)
To: seutonius1234
I am a proud Missourian and it doesn't bother me one bit to have to show ID to vote down at the fire station. It's important enough to me to be worth the little effort it takes.
The dung beetle who wrote this editorial has probably never voted in his mediocre life.
42 posted on
08/10/2006 6:00:46 PM PDT by
MadJack
("Today is the first day of the rest of your miserable existence. Suck it up, loser.")
To: seutonius1234
Missouri is the latest front in the Republican Partys campaign to use photo ID requirements to suppress voting.
The GOP should be on this constantly giving examples of vote fraud . Stay on the attack
If voters aren't knowledgeable enough to get the IDs they shouldn't be voting
44 posted on
08/10/2006 6:11:02 PM PDT by
uncbob
To: seutonius1234
These arguments against photo ID are pure, unadulterated B--- S---. Tey've been used successfully again and again in Wisconsin to keep us from havingany control whatsoever over who votes, how many times they vote, and whether they are eligible to vote. It is a scandal. Our felonious Dem Governor vetoed a voter ID bill 3 times in the last 4 years. In fact, our voter commission is not even going to abide by Federal law in this matter. It is a scandal.
To: seutonius1234
This asinine report also doesn't include the fact that there is no charge for a Missouri ID. However a birth certificate and social security card is required to get one. There is a charge for that. If the Dimmies in St. Louis and Kansas City were really interested in their constituents, they'd be organizing free transportation for those poor unfortunates that have no way to the DMV. ( yes, I'm being just a wee bit sarcastic!)
48 posted on
08/10/2006 6:36:25 PM PDT by
swmobuffalo
(The only good terrorist is a dead terrorist.)
To: seutonius1234
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ... Why?
Another question: Why are the voter registers not wiped after each election?
49 posted on
08/10/2006 6:43:34 PM PDT by
Big Giant Head
(I should change my tagline to "Big Giant Pancake on my Head")
To: seutonius1234
Yes, it's the Republican's Evil Plot to suppress illegitimate voting, the bread and butter of urban Democrats everywhere. Heaven forbid Republicans want to make sure that the people who vote are entitled to vote. I bet they'd really scream about voting machines that log votes with timestamps at a central server that could uncover classic gems like hundreds of votes being cast before the polls open or after they close, too.
To: seutonius1234
Let's face it. Requiring legitimate ID
WILL surpress a very important part of the dem and leftist voter base. The dead won't be able to vote, and it will keep many dems from being able to vote early and often. After all, when a dem usually votes in different precincts under different names, being forced to get state IDs for each of those identities is quite a hassle.
Mark
51 posted on
08/10/2006 7:04:41 PM PDT by
MarkL
(When Kaylee says "No power in the `verse can stop me," it's cute. When River says it, it's scary!)
To: seutonius1234
Missouris new ID rules and similar ones adopted last year in Indiana and Georgia are intended to deter voting by blacks, poor people and other groups that are less likely to have drivers licenses.I think the writer left out children, felons and dead people. Plus this statement isn't true.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-29 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson