Skip to comments.
Willpower is best used with care
The Australian ^
| August 10, 2006
| Cordelia Fine
Posted on 08/09/2006 8:47:38 PM PDT by SamAdams76
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-28 last
To: lepton
It happened in the late 1700s. And the teaching at the time was pedestrian by design.
21
posted on
08/10/2006 12:39:01 AM PDT
by
GSlob
To: ReignOfError
I know I can take that one dollar to the corner store, buy ten 10-cent boxes of candy. and sell them at school for a quarter apiece.Or maybe go buy a lottery ticket with the $1 and win $1,000,000.
Great screen name - appropriate too.
23
posted on
08/10/2006 7:03:10 AM PDT
by
Badray
(CFR my ass. There's not too much money in politics. There's too much money in government hands.)
To: GSlob
Sounds like a reasonable take on it to me.
To: SamAdams76
Really enjoyed the post. Also enjoyed the comments by fellow posters that offered some balance.
If you would like to read a short article that goes along with the same line of thinking try Chess & Basketball? Chess and Boxing? The correlations for achieving excellence are amazing!
RileyD, nwJ
25
posted on
08/10/2006 3:23:11 PM PDT
by
RileyD, nwJ
("Only the humble are sane." anon)
To: Conservative Goddess
I couldn't finish the article. Dog Eat Dog was on. LOL
Just kidding. Very interesting.
26
posted on
08/10/2006 6:38:02 PM PDT
by
Badray
(CFR my ass. There's not too much money in politics. There's too much money in government hands.)
To: GSlob
It happened in the late 1700s. And the teaching at the time was pedestrian by design. Well, yes...I'll concede that I wasn't around in the 1700s and thus can't compete. On the other hand, I came up with it on my own from a simple visualization (at a time I was doing poorly in math because I was completely uninterested in the class). The teacher wasn't trying to teach us to think that way...as a matter of fact, it's closely associated with his publicly ridiculing me, and most likely he was simply being a smartass as I got sent to the principals office *again* shortly thereafter.
I'm not convinced it is an exceptionally big leap to be made. Certainly no bigger than looking at a multiplication table we were supposed to memorize and deducing algebraic patterns to relationships and using them to replace the rote memorization that was being requested of me in an earlier grade. I don't think either is an example that puts me in the same category as Gauss.
27
posted on
08/10/2006 8:38:22 PM PDT
by
lepton
("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
To: lepton
"I don't think either is an example that puts me in the same category as Gauss."
Not yet. But those who could not do even that wash out immediately. Besides, Gauss at the time was about 8-9 years old, I believe. Later he did much more interesting stuff, but this one case is a perfect example how a flash of insight can effortlessly trump sweaty perseverance. Not everyone is capable of such sparks and flashes, and even those who are capable of them very rarely could produce them at will. Normal scientists, even good ones, usually have their lifetime good ideas countable on the fingers of one hand.
28
posted on
08/10/2006 8:49:07 PM PDT
by
GSlob
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-28 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson