Posted on 07/24/2006 4:44:22 AM PDT by voletti
Oh boy.
Oh, puh-leeze......
SMUG ALERT! MANBEARPIG ALERT!
good for the Amazon. who gives a capibara's @ss.
Now this is bad science ...
"When Dr Dan Nepstead started the experiment in 2002 by covering a chunk of rainforest the size of a football pitch with plastic panels to see how it would cope without rain he surrounded it with sophisticated sensors, expecting to record only minor changes, The Independent reports.
The trees managed the first year of drought without difficulty. In the second year, they sunk their roots deeper to find moisture, but survived. But in year three, they started dying. Beginning with the tallest the trees started to come crashing down, exposing the forest floor to the drying sun.
By the end of the year the trees had released more than two-thirds of the carbon dioxide they have stored during their lives, helping to act as a break on global warming. Instead they began accelerating the climate change.
Here here!
Alas, there are an awful lot of fiddle players out there on the world stage.
The Independent on Sunday, quote studies conducted by the blue-chip Woods Hole Research Centre in Amazonia as concluding that the forest cannot withstand more than two consecutive years of drought without breaking down.
I always though it ironic that the "back to nature" Bugs and Bunny crowd whose goal is to eliminate big business as a concept, would use the words, "bluechip" to endow a cited source with respectability and with the cachet of competence.
It didn't work in this case..
If the Amazon is destined for deserttification, neither the insane nor the competent can prevent it. Whenever it happens.
Sahara desert could become a rainforest.
Just as likely.
Since what seems to be needed is some rain. Maybe we could get a rain machine and send it down there. Oh !!Thats right, we dont have a rain machine do we?
Forest fires cause global cooling from particulates. Plus a healthy rainforest produces lots of methane. Look at a picture of global methane (sorry lost my link) and you will see the most massive amounts coming out of the rainforests.
WE'RE DOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMED!!!
Or as late as 2075 ... but it's all very scientific, really!
Al Gore "science".
Ok. Next "news" item...
Oh yes, the technique: cite a ridiculously obvious fact; prove it "scientifically". Then go on a rant with endless handwringing over (scientifically) totally unrelated causes and consequences.
I think you'll find that wetlands by far produce the most methane followed by forest termites, and oceans. They are the top three sources of (natural) methane.
What's new?
Nature is cruel, unfeeling and uncompromising; and the one constant in nature is change.
..........yea..and San Fancisco may become a Mormon stronghold.....
Land fills, refineries (and similar) and the bowels of cud-chewing domesticated livestock are the three largest 'man-made' sources of methane.
Those Amazon trees are sure resilient.
2 years without rain and they all survive. Most survived even the third year without rain.
Drought resistent tropical rain forest (averaging 100 inches of rain per year), who would have guessed it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.