Skip to comments.
Rice urges diplomacy over Israeli hostage in Gaza [Nauseating news.]
Reuters ^
| 26JUN06
| Reuters
Posted on 06/27/2006 1:44:38 AM PDT by familyop
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
Is Secretary Rice is unaware of what has happened as a result of "diplomacy" in similar situations of the past? Does she care? And the pandering to reporters in Scotland with advice to respond inappropriately to terrorists is revolting.
1
posted on
06/27/2006 1:44:42 AM PDT
by
familyop
To: familyop
Ms Rice isn't as stupid as one may think. Could well be that she's got multiple plays she's running (I'd count on it).
Diplomacy isn't a dumb thing to do -- particularly if it works. When all else fails, she can always send in the SAS.
2
posted on
06/27/2006 1:48:58 AM PDT
by
DieHard the Hunter
(I am the Chieftain of my Clan. I bow to nobody. Get out of my way.)
To: familyop
I don't agree with her. Prayers for the young soldier.
To: familyop
Never negotiate with terrorist.
4
posted on
06/27/2006 1:49:18 AM PDT
by
Pro-Bush
(A nation without borders is not a nation." President Reagan)
To: DieHard the Hunter
Negotiate with Hamas, are you stoned? When the hell has that ever worked? Hell, we buy weapons and train them already due to so-called "diplomacy".
5
posted on
06/27/2006 1:55:04 AM PDT
by
Pro-Bush
(A nation without borders is not a nation." President Reagan)
To: familyop
"Palestinians in northern Gaza have begun blocking roads with mounds of earth"
The Palestinians are really trying to help. (sarc)
I would suggest that the IDF tanks go around these piles through their houses instead.
6
posted on
06/27/2006 1:58:02 AM PDT
by
liliesgrandpa
(The Republican Party simply can't do anything without that critical 100-seat Senate majority.)
To: Pro-Bush
> Negotiate with Hamas, are you stoned?
No.
> When the hell has that ever worked?
When was the last time it was tried?
> Hell, we buy weapons and train them already due to so-called "diplomacy".
Then more the fool you lot: there is a huge difference between negotiating and enabling.
7
posted on
06/27/2006 1:59:05 AM PDT
by
DieHard the Hunter
(I am the Chieftain of my Clan. I bow to nobody. Get out of my way.)
To: DieHard the Hunter
"
Diplomacy isn't a dumb thing to do -- particularly if it works. When all else fails, she can always send in the SAS."
Yes, she'd probably be made an honorary commander of the SAS (British Special Air Service) for a day, if she'd only sympathize a little more with the "Palestinians."
British Mandate for Palestine (WW I to 1948)
ICM (Poll of British people)
"
ICM Research interviewed a random sample of 1,000 adults aged 18+ by telephone on 20-21st April, 2002. Interviews were conducted across the country and the results have been weighted to the profile of all adults.
. . . "
Q3. In the dispute in the Middle East between Israel and the Palestinians, from what you have seen and heard about the conflict which of the two do you sympathise with more, Israel or the Palestinians?"
Israel 14%
Palestine 28%
Both 14%
Neither 23%
Don't know 20%
"
8
posted on
06/27/2006 2:02:05 AM PDT
by
familyop
("Either you're with us, or you're with the terrorists" ["Roadmap" excluded] --President Bush)
To: familyop
I will never understand why our current administration feels they are justified in using military means to protect Americans from terrorists, but Israel should sit back and take it.
The double standard is nothing more than playing with lives.
9
posted on
06/27/2006 2:05:13 AM PDT
by
Brytani
(Someone stole my tagline - reward for its return!!!)
To: DieHard the Hunter
You are a more of a fool than I originally thought. Do you own homework screwball.
10
posted on
06/27/2006 2:06:44 AM PDT
by
Pro-Bush
(A nation without borders is not a nation." President Reagan)
To: DieHard the Hunter
The USA doesn't negotiate with terrorists on kidnappings. Most other western culture countries don't, either. Why should our Secretary of State Rice demand that Israel do so?
IMO, we in the USA should not be cheating Israel on security in such a way in order to please western Europeans.
11
posted on
06/27/2006 2:06:48 AM PDT
by
familyop
("Either you're with us, or you're with the terrorists" ["Roadmap" excluded] --President Bush)
To: familyop
12
posted on
06/27/2006 2:07:48 AM PDT
by
SR 50
(Larry)
To: liliesgrandpa
I would suggest that the IDF tanks go around these piles through their houses instead. Very astute. Well said.
13
posted on
06/27/2006 2:08:23 AM PDT
by
Dosa26
To: Pro-Bush
> You are a more of a fool than I originally thought. Do you own homework screwball.
Temper, temper... I've done my homework. Doubt you have.
14
posted on
06/27/2006 2:12:28 AM PDT
by
DieHard the Hunter
(I am the Chieftain of my Clan. I bow to nobody. Get out of my way.)
To: familyop
> The USA doesn't negotiate with terrorists on kidnappings.
I guess you're right, if you ignore Carter's bungled handling of the Iranian hostage crisis.
> IMO, we in the USA should not be cheating Israel on security in such a way in order to please western Europeans.
Or anybody else, for that matter.
15
posted on
06/27/2006 2:16:33 AM PDT
by
DieHard the Hunter
(I am the Chieftain of my Clan. I bow to nobody. Get out of my way.)
To: DieHard the Hunter
Who likes a smartass? I am not playing your pissing contest.
16
posted on
06/27/2006 2:20:13 AM PDT
by
Pro-Bush
(A nation without borders is not a nation." President Reagan)
To: Pro-Bush
> Who likes a smartass? I am not playing your pissing contest.
Suits me fine.
17
posted on
06/27/2006 2:22:05 AM PDT
by
DieHard the Hunter
(I am the Chieftain of my Clan. I bow to nobody. Get out of my way.)
To: DieHard the Hunter
That's a good point about Carter.
18
posted on
06/27/2006 2:24:19 AM PDT
by
familyop
("Either you're with us, or you're with the terrorists" ["Roadmap" excluded] --President Bush)
To: DieHard the Hunter
Please read the history behind the "British Mandate" link, if you get the time. It's about the past, but it's good background material for some of the policy we've been seeing. The site lacks citations (references), but there are plenty of keywords to use in searches for finding them.
19
posted on
06/27/2006 2:27:00 AM PDT
by
familyop
("Either you're with us, or you're with the terrorists" ["Roadmap" excluded] --President Bush)
To: familyop
> That's a good point about Carter.
I've often wondered if there aren't "dots" to be connected between the BCCI and al Qaeda. Do you know if anybody has tried to connect the dots?
20
posted on
06/27/2006 2:27:22 AM PDT
by
DieHard the Hunter
(I am the Chieftain of my Clan. I bow to nobody. Get out of my way.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson