The way I see it, the feminist, male or female, is anti-conservative, profoundly moment oriented, i.e., lives for the moment, demands instant gratification, are the ultimate hedonists, and care nothing about the future, except that today's pleasures are provided for in the future in some haphazard manner. Feminists don't invest, nor do they expect a return. They are metaphorically like hunter-gatherers taking berries and bugs from one area and moving on to the next, living hand to mouth.
Conservatives, who are anti-feminists, will engage in deferral of gratification so that the future can be more prosperous. My dad and I, we are conservatives. Conservatives invest. Raising children is an investment in something.
So it is not surprising that this feminist believes that child rearing is not worthy of....someone. It doesn't fit with their hunter-gatherer hand to mouth mentality. My mother did not raise me. She was not busy with career as she was trying to have a family with a feminist man she idolized and his boys who she considered her real sons.
Back to the article, notice the political speech. Let's parse and analyze this a little.
Feminist Says Child Rearing not Worthy of Time and Talents of Intelligent Humans
First, she could have said, "child rearing is not worth anyone's time." But no. It is not worth the time, she says, of "Intelligent Humans." Everyone wants to be an intelligent human. This is her way of saying, that if you want to raise your children, then you are not intelligent. It is also to say, if you want Me to think that You are intelligent, then you must think (as I tell you to think) that it not worth your time to raise children. I think most people are intelligent enough to see through her B.S. I don't know any conservatives who need her approval. Feminists are evil. Feminists are a greater immediate threat to the United States than Islam. She can go suck eggs.