We're doomed.
Posted on 06/13/2006 6:08:39 AM PDT by conservativecorner
Tell me what the agenda is, then.
Bump.
"Boy buggering in both Islam and Catholicism is okay with the Pope as long as it isn't reported by the liberal press"
For thirty years that certainly appeared to be the policy coming out of Rome. Pay the victims and very quietly move the priests to a location where they would have a new batch of boys to molest was the unspoken policy or so it looked. Very few priest were ever kicked out of the Church during the 60's or 70's and not a heck of a lot were punished in the 80's or 90's either!
If this is anti-Catholicism, tough. Look at the facts and learn.
We're doomed.
DOJ threw everything they had at Tyson. The jury ruled not guilty. Given that fact, widespread prosecution is a waste of time and money.
LOL
Totally serial.
Now where have I heard that argument before?
Could it beeeeeee....Manbearpig?
Another bigot heard from.
They aren't telling us anything.
It's crazies like Corsi and I guess yourself who are reading between the lines and putting things together that I just don't see.
Sorry if that upsets you, but what are you going to do? NOthing except bitch about it on the internet.
And as your vehemence grows, I will be here to laugh at every post.
Hell JIMROB was making fun of you just last night. He's as conservative as they come. If he sees it, MAYBE there's something to the notion that Corsi is leading you all by the nose.
No kidding. This thread is an unexpected treasure-trove.
LOL
maybe they are searching for Manbearpig and had to settle for Corsi?
nah :)
Nah, Corsi is half-man, two-thirds bear, but only one-third pig.
LOL
If the DOJ couldn't get a conviction, they didn't try, just like enforcement agencies don't try to enforce the law.
This is clear: if the chief executive himself doesn't want to threaten the illegal alien status quo, and he has said outright he doesn't, why do you think the DOJ will make any significant effort?
Be that as it may, though, the chief executive is required to keep it up. Or has he the discretion to say that if a try doesn't work, he'll just ignore the law?
No, you can give me no rationale for the president's negligence in this matter. He simply wants a consolidation, as his meeting and agreements with Canadian and Mexicans leaders say he does.
Got a link to the Tyson case? I'll bet you a quarter the DOJ threw it deliberately.
You know what's disappointing? They made me a keyword, but this is the only article that has it as a keyword.
I thought I rated higher. Ah, well.
Then you agree that policy-- e.g., laws, regulations, spending is being discussed? That this policy is guided by an agenda, one of fostering greater cooperation between the respective countries? That is real big of you.
The policies are enumerated in the article, the length of which you complained. One such policy is:
-- Implement a border-facilitation strategy to build capacity and improve the legitimate flow of people and cargo at our shared borders.
The flow of people across our Southern border has been a source of some controversy lately. I would think that any U.S. policy concerning the flow of people across our border would be the legitimate concern of Congress. Don't you? But Corsi's point, which you have not refuted, is that this whole initiative is moving forward neither at Congress's behest nor with its oversight.
Gotta go now. You boys have fun.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.