NJ assemblywomen call for boycott of new Coulter book

Phillyburbs/AP ^ | 6/8/06 | staff

[Russ_in_NC]

How in the world did you get or even imply that I was infallible? You people are amazing. Your little world is shattered because someone dares to point out a blaring hypocrisy and all of a sudden those that point that out are claiming they are infallible?

Get a life will ya...

[pissant]

ROFLMAO

[tongue-tied]

Fine...then quit calling her Bones. You'll have your own revenge anyway apparently

when the cigarettes and the booze catch up to her, as they will.

so why make petty little high school comments regarding her body mass?

What do you sort of people do when you can't belittle someone for their looks? Hang out at the mall in pairs and badmouth folks as they walk by?

I just rechecked, this IS Free Republic. Wow. Thought maybe I'd stumbled into some MySpace blog page by accident.

[republicofdavis]

Putting Zarqawi and the widows in the same sentence when discussing evilness is a little over the top, in my opinion.

[pissant]

The shoe fit!

Is that when Hillary takes off her shoe from her canckle and whacks bubba with it?

[pissant]

She uses libs for target practice. And is a good shot.

[sinkspur]

Yet the process of thinking through the whole thing is so complex that all most people are going to retain is that Ann made a nasty crack about the their personal lives, as you say.

I don't know what you're trying to say. It is most certainly not complex to have a politicial disagreement with somebody without getting personal. Every dummy knows when that is happening, just as they know when somebody is attacking somebody else.

Bones is attacking these women, no matter how many qualifiers she or you or anybody else uses to try to explain away that unpleasant fact. She had no reason to speculate about the status of their marriages or what their dead husbands might or might not have done when she could simply have taken them to task over their statements to the 9/11 commission.

Instead of talking about her dopey view of evolution, everybody is focused on her gratutious trashing of innocent dead men.

Coulter may sell a lot of books, but she's going to be doing it with her pants around her ankles.

[pissant]

It's all marketing. I'll save my rage for those who commit treason, not those who toss insults.

[Jameison]

"Of course the two Dummy NJ legislators also called for bans on books slandering the president. Sure."

Or bans for Micheal Moore's fake , lying "documentary"?
NOT.

[pissant]

At a minimum. In NJ alone.

[firebrand]

I don't think Barnes & Noble is going to be able to hide it this time. It's in a special display unit right in front of the door that surely has been bought by the publishers.

[Dante3]

He/she sounds bitter, like someone who was rejected by Ann or her look-alike, or simply is bitter at life.

[papertyger]

...so why make petty little high school comments...

:o)

[Jameison]

"Bones is attacking these women"

She is?
Excellent!

[Recovering_Democrat]

I'm just asking how you know why Ann isn't married, that's all.

[republicofdavis]

"She didn't pick the statement that they (and apparently we) would fixate on."

She had to know it would be tremendously provocative. She's not stupid. Think back to when she wrote about "converting the muslims." Highly provocative. And right on the point of what she was talking about. That's when I think she's most effective.

[pissant]

Coulter certainly does not despise GWB.

[polymuser]

Hey Ann! You go, girl!

[Jameison]

"Putting Zarqawi and the widows in the same sentence when discussing evilness is a little over the top, in my opinion."

No.
I have heard some of what the 4 nasties said about President Bush.
Can't see much difference between what they said and what Zarqawi said.
They must have been taking talking points from each other.

[Scotsman will be Free]

I'm sorry. While reading her multiple, harping posts on protecting the children I thought that I was reading a liberal screed. Nits make lice.