Want proof?
Terrorist Taliban commander Mullah Hayat Khan
photographed in his private meeting with Reuters-terrorists
who worship at his feet, in the Pakistan-Afghan border city of Chaman June 4, 2006.
Posted on 06/07/2006 4:51:37 PM PDT by new yorker 77
You're engaging in projection. These 4 are liberal Demorats.
No, I am not playing that game. Of course I find that beyond reprehensible. Defend this comment of Ann's, good luck because it is indefensible. Please keep in mind that she is also suggesting the husbands who died would have left their wives and children. Sorry, but Ann effed up royally:
"By the way, how do we know their husbands weren't planning to divorce these harpies? Now that their shelf life is dwindling, they'd better hurry up and appear in Playboy."
The problem with this, and the thing that happens many times with her, is that everybody gets disctracted from her well-thought-out ideas and gets into a war over her rhetoric.
The theme of this book is that liberals are godless and this dust-up over the Jersey Girls fits into that how?
The media is proving Coulter's real point of her rant that liberals use "unassailable victims" to do their dirty work, e.g. Jersey Girls, Cindy Sheehan, Joe Wilson, etc.
Your feelings seem hurt by the long tradition of political polemic in America.
Not quite brainy enough for the pissant crowd, I don't guess.
"By the way, how do we know their husbands weren't planning to divorce these harpies? Now that their shelf life is dwindling, they'd better hurry up and appear in Playboy."
No class."
--- -- --
Is this the first time you've seen politics get dirty?
Ann's goal was to reveal these women as political hacks for the left, and she did it in a very memorable way.
A small sample from Mrs. Breitweiser who is evidently a left wing player in the world of politics.
"Can someone please explain to me why Rudy Giuliani gets to give a victim's impact statement at the Moussaoui penalty phase hearing? Which family member did Guiliani lose in the attacks?"
Judging by this statement and many others it would seem that Ann Coulter's comments regarding this woman's intemperate use of her husbands demise is right on the mark.
FWIW however, I think Ann needs to be more temperate herself.
Want proof?
Terrorist Taliban commander Mullah Hayat Khan
photographed in his private meeting with Reuters-terrorists
who worship at his feet, in the Pakistan-Afghan border city of Chaman June 4, 2006.
I was trying to be irreverently humorous, not side against Coulter. Evidentially I failed. Sorry for the misunderstanding.
You may be more right than you realize. That Adam's apple is a dead giveaway.
A small sample from Mrs. Breitweiser who is evidently a left wing player in the world of politics.
"Can someone please explain to me why Rudy Giuliani gets to give a victim's impact statement at the Moussaoui penalty phase hearing? Which family member did Guiliani lose in the attacks?"
Judging by this statement and many others it would seem that Ann Coulter's comments regarding this woman's intemperate use of her husbands demise is right on the mark.
FWIW however, I think Ann needs to be more temperate herself.
Mwa ha ha haa. One of my favorite Coulter lines ever: "Liberals do not know the meanings of the words 'absolute,' 'moral,' or 'authority.'"
I'd like some proof that they actually saw this.
I fear she's outdone herself this time.
You won't see one public official speaking in her defense on this subject, unless they're looking to retire early.
Over the top, into the thickest fire, and right down their throats. Gotta love her.
political agenda. period.
Was their any joy in trying to defeat a President who most 9-11 families supported?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.