Posted on 06/07/2006 4:51:37 PM PDT by new yorker 77
Well, doc, you believe whatever you want. I don't think Coulter knows the first thing about Christian charity.
Sorry Azalea, I had to stop after your first sentence and respond:
Hell!! Azalea, MEN aren't supposed to have balls, these days!!!
Not when your name is Ann Coulter. She makes her living at this. I'm still yet to be offended by her "let's invade their countries and convert them to Christianity" comment.
"Using sideshow tactics and over the top rhetoric in an attempt to draw attention to yourself is wrong, no matter what your argument is."
I don't agree with that at all, we live in an age of left wing sideshow tactics and over the top rhetoric, the left should quit trying to influence public policy by using victims, the society at large is growing tired of it, and is becoming less responsive. The left has mastered the policy thru victim game, Ann is right to expose it. People can go on and on about how unclassy it is etc, that is, as usual, a change of subject, but there is a huge constituency that is growing tired of victims using their personal tragedies to gain access to power. Cindy Sheehan is much less beloved by society at large, than she is by the media and "progressives", victim fatigue is settling in, and it is long overdue. Lots of people are going to see Ann's point, this is the kind of thing where it is real easy to act shocked, but the longer the conversation the more it turns in the right direction...
He'd offer her a sandwich.
Pot to kettle.
Not BITE the prisoner, simply threaten the prisoner.
This makes me ill.
???
:-)
that is called "humor". Go read some PJ O'Rourke and you will see what I mean.
Those Jersey Girls sure look creepy in that picture.
Because of the Jersey girls?
Or is it because of the whining about the Homeland Security money?
"Did you type that with a straight face?! "
Yes sir/ma'am, I did type it with a straight face. Ann is provocative, that's what she does. She is doing a great job of it as you can see from the discussion on this thread.
We're not talking about sexual indescretions here, Palladin.
I like your tagline!
You know, I agree with you, because the Christianity comment was intended to be ironic based in the objectives of our enemies.
I am just having a difficult time trying to figure out what exactly she was trying to say in this case because it was very, very personal and did not align with things they themselves have said.
That makes it seem like a good old fashioned flame war to me. Or, as my mother used to say, a cat fight.
Exactly and it's not wrong to expose that IMHO. Is it true that some of these victims families really abused the systems up there OF?
Everyone was talking about Clinton's BJ too.
Go find that other post about finding a corner to whimper in. Then go find a corner.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.