Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"A HOUSE DIVIDED" - Pukin's FReeperversary Rant

Posted on 05/17/2006 7:47:58 AM PDT by Pukin Dog

Edited on 05/17/2006 8:30:59 AM PDT by Lead Moderator. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,701-1,7201,721-1,7401,741-1,760 ... 3,681 next last
To: trubluolyguy
As am I, tru. Sometimes it takes a great deal of effort to maintain control, but it's worth the effort.

That thread proved it could be done, and I hope there are more threads like it in the future (but not started by ME. LOL.....that was hard work!! :)

1,721 posted on 05/17/2006 2:19:06 PM PDT by ohioWfan (PROUD Mom of an Iraqi LIBERATION Vet! THANKS, son!!.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1463 | View Replies]

To: onyx

I just said I did. In fact, one of the three all-Red states in 2000 and 2004. We're waiting for the rest of you to catch up.


1,722 posted on 05/17/2006 2:19:23 PM PDT by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1719 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Uh, I think you need to ban yourself for abusing your posting guidelines.


1,723 posted on 05/17/2006 2:19:24 PM PDT by Feiny (Now go bang your heads on your desks until something useful comes out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1659 | View Replies]

To: onyx

I am talking about the fact that upward of 80% of new Latino citizens vote for Democrats.


1,724 posted on 05/17/2006 2:19:29 PM PDT by AntiGuv (How is Mexico our friend?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1713 | View Replies]

To: Torie
"I do have some concern in the meantime, that then Hispanics are 60% of the likely voters in California, they will vote in politicians that remind one of politicians in Mexico."

Just out of curiosity, would there be that much of a difference? From what I can see from outside the state, it seems much of CA's problem with illegals is the protection, rights and benefits that the current local and state government is providing them.

1,725 posted on 05/17/2006 2:19:37 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1718 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
hardly anyone seems to be talking about the elephant in the room: That we're debating whether to give citizenship to a minimum of 10 million future Democrats who will turn right around and ship in another minimum 10 million future Democrats.

No bill is better than this bill. No amnesty. Keep the status quo.

1,726 posted on 05/17/2006 2:20:09 PM PDT by lemura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1705 | View Replies]

To: Torie
Bush and the Senate majority must think voters are stuck on stupid or something. JMO.

No .. though I will admit there are a number in the Senate that are a real PITA

1,727 posted on 05/17/2006 2:20:59 PM PDT by Mo1 (DEMOCRATS: A CULTURE OF TREASON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1692 | View Replies]

To: Torie

There are huge numbers of the stupid voting. Kerry got almost 50% of the vote last election.


1,728 posted on 05/17/2006 2:21:22 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1692 | View Replies]

To: pollyannaish
You have the luxury of voting for more and more conservative candidates with a chance that they can actually win. Here, we just try to get the seats in the R column so that the conservatives can lead. It's all about control.

We have to find a way to defeat Nelson, a fake conservative Democrat. Notice how how was voting on these immigration bills? He's peeing himself over the fall election. But we have a very rich Republican who has a very scary campaign warchest in a heavily Republican state. I want payback for what Nelson did to us while governor.
1,729 posted on 05/17/2006 2:22:14 PM PDT by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1716 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson

The difference would be corruption. California is still an amazingly corruption free state. Liberals wackos may be wacko (and California has a boat load of them), but they tend not to be into corruption.


1,730 posted on 05/17/2006 2:22:26 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1725 | View Replies]

To: Lead Moderator
Reagan's was a blanket amnesty bill, with no border security

Actually, there was promised enforcement and border security that never happened. Which IMO is another good reason to de-couple the two - make the government improve security and THEN we'll talk guest worker. If the Bush Admin gets what they want with a guest worker program, will they follow up on enforcement? Or just let the issue stagnate like the Reagan Admin did?

I'm a pubbie to the bone, but I still realize that goverment will be government, no matter who is in charge, and it's best to make them eat their peas before you let them have their pudding.

1,731 posted on 05/17/2006 2:22:47 PM PDT by dirtboy (An illegal immigrant says my tagline used to be part of Mexico)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1664 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv

That's why "stupid" GOP officeholders in border states are so damn squishy. The fools fear the vote they don't have. Some understand it, some don't, and those who don't are the ones I am calling fools.


1,732 posted on 05/17/2006 2:23:21 PM PDT by onyx (Deport the trolls --- send them back to DU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1724 | View Replies]

To: ClancyJ

"So, apparently you are not working to help for a GOP victory."

Oh yes I am!
I am doing you the greatest service that a knowledgeable junior officer can do for his senior commander: I am telling you the unvarnished truth to try and pull you back from making a catastrophic decision.

"Just how will the democrat congress help any of our conservative agenda items?"

It WON'T. We need to not have a Democratic Congress.
The way not to have a Democratic Congress is not by telling people to give up non-negotiable positions. You can't raise taxes and keep Congress: the tax hawks will leave, no matter what. You can't put a pro-abortion Supreme Court justice up there: the pro-lifers will leave, no matter what. And you can't give the Border Conservatives the stiff arm and keep Congress: they are leaving, right now. Concerns about the future on other issues, or yelling at them, is not going to do that. You have to give them what they want.
And the meaningful part of what they want that CAN be given to them is the sea-to-sea Fence.

"Just how much damage was done by the prior democratic imposed rulings - such as the destruction to the intelligence agencies, 'the created wall' between the agencies, the destruction of the military."

Yep, it was a total DISASTER wasn't it?
So give the BorderBots their fence and we don't have to worry about it.

"Just how much easier will it be to get conservative judges nominated and input into the Supreme Court with no majority in congress? We can't get anything through now - how is a democratic congress going to input good judges?"

A total disaster.
So give the BorderBots their sea-to-sea Fence and we don't have to worry about it.

"If I weigh the two options - democratic congress or holding with the GOP majority - I see no comparison."

Neither do I
But tax-hawks didn't give a damn about big-picture things when they abandoned the GOP in 1992. The GOP lost everything, but retooled and gave the Contract With America, which took everything and more in 1994.

And pro-lifers, like me, didn't give a damn about anything else when the totally unacceptable Miers nomination was made, not after all those years. But the President stared into the political open grave, realized that the jig was up, caved, and put up the brilliant Alito. Disaster averted.

BorderBots think that the country is lost anyway if the border isn't closed. So avoid disaster, flinch, give them their sea-to-sea fence, and we don't have to replay 1992-1994. Instead we can replay the Miers nomination with its happy ending for conservatives.

"Your method means we are always having to play catch up and never get used to being the ones in power."

It's not MY method. It's the way of the world. People have a limit beyond which they will NOT be pressed "for the good of the team". There comes a point where people defect and everything falls apart.

Bush 41 went over that limit when he raised taxes.
Bush 43 walked up to the line and tested the limit with Miers, and then wisely did NOT challenge the pro-lifers to a duel that would have ended in mutally assured destruction.
The President went over the line with the BorderBots. They will NEVER accept this proposal, because it's a finger in their eye. They got NOTHING, and they're heading out the door.
They have GOT to be brought back. And that means that the President has to lose here, and the Senate has to partly lose, and the House Republicans have to win ENOUGH that a Wall is agreed upon in the reconciliation committee bill between Senate and House. The BorderBots have to get that wall on the border, or it's over. No amount of strategizing or screaming about dire consequences will bring them back this year if they aren't appeased. See that, understand it, and understand that I am not the guy to yell at. The guy to put pressure on is President Bush and Republican (and Democrat) Senators who are opposing a sea-to-sea, physical wall NOW. They have to cave to save the party this year. 3 million + committed BorderBots CAN'T cave. That's just not human nature. Politics is the art of the possible, and keeping Congress without the BorderBot votes, or keeping the BorderBots without a wall this year is impossible.

"Your way allows for much more committee leadership positions that trail off into future GOP terms."

It's not MY way. It's what will happen. There are two options. Win, by bringing back the BorderBots with a fence. Or do anything else and lose. Really it's YOUR move.

"Your way allows for increased power base building among the already intrenched democrats. Your way allows for more democrat infiltration into every phase of government."

It's not MY way. I'd give the BorderBots their damned fence (which I don't like by the way, but understand is politically NECESSARY to save the ship) and win the election and be done with it. That's the easiest course. Trying to turn around 3 million angry people is impossible. Putting the fear of God into a few dozen Senators is easier, by comparison.

"Just how is that effective for conservatism?"

Giving the BorderBots their fence WINS THE ELECTION.
THAT'S pretty effective for conservatism.
Doing otherwise LOSES it.
That's pretty ineffective for conservatism.

"Seems that is going backwards to me. And, it seems that means you are working against us - not for us."

No, I am telling you the truth.
And I am not complaining, whingeing or whining.
I have clearly diagnosed the problem.
Clearly laid out the consequences, and clearly presscribed the cure.

Congress is well worth a wall.
Just do it.


1,733 posted on 05/17/2006 2:23:30 PM PDT by Vicomte13 (Aure entuluva!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1182 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
Thank you for an excellent post. It was a treat to read a reasonable, well-thought out opinion after some of the disturbing and pessimistic rants I read yesterday -- some are still doing it today. This thread has given me hope that perhaps the voice of reason will prevail!
1,734 posted on 05/17/2006 2:23:32 PM PDT by PeskyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: airborne

It would be prudent to wait until the General Election before declaring any victory.


1,735 posted on 05/17/2006 2:24:02 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1712 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog; Cyber Liberty
Great rant, Pukin Dog!

Cyber is more profound at politics than I could ever be, but I'm even more conservative. I've always voted the Republic ticket. But John McCain? J.D. Hayworth would fill my heart with joy!

1,736 posted on 05/17/2006 2:24:04 PM PDT by Slip18
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson

Then we disagree on how to repair the damn.

I don't advocate sticking a finger in a tiny crack while watching the town flood from the gaping hole.


1,737 posted on 05/17/2006 2:24:17 PM PDT by nicmarlo (Bush is the Best President Ever. Rah. Rah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1711 | View Replies]

To: Torie
"California is still an amazingly corruption free state. Liberals wackos may be wacko (and California has a boat load of them), but they tend not to be into corruption."

LA?

1,738 posted on 05/17/2006 2:24:31 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1730 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush

Work hard and good luck.


1,739 posted on 05/17/2006 2:24:40 PM PDT by pollyannaish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1729 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
Neither have I seen a moderator take one side to this extent.

My post # 443 I commented on the same thing.

Sorry for the delay. My comput. was dragging something fierce.

1,740 posted on 05/17/2006 2:24:56 PM PDT by processing please hold (Be careful of charity and kindness, lest you do more harm with open hands than with a clinched fist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1624 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,701-1,7201,721-1,7401,741-1,760 ... 3,681 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson