Skip to comments.
Did These Ploys Sneak into Bush's Speech?(Bait & Switch)
Chicago Sun-Times ^
| May 16, 2006
| JOHN O'SULLIVAN
Posted on 05/16/2006 5:36:42 AM PDT by kellynla
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 241-242 next last
To: avacado
"You probably do not even live in a border state"
wrong
"This is a States' issue."
wrong again (ya might want to pick up a copy of the Constitution and READ IT!)
21
posted on
05/16/2006 6:10:26 AM PDT
by
kellynla
(Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
To: kellynla
22
posted on
05/16/2006 6:10:57 AM PDT
by
dennisw
To: kellynla
23
posted on
05/16/2006 6:11:16 AM PDT
by
DoctorMichael
(The Fourth Estate is a Fifth Column!!!!!!!!!)
To: dandiegirl
"It's hard to continue to be on board with a president who worries more about what the leader of a corrupt third world country thinks of him than his own citizens who put him in office for 8 years."
Well said.
24
posted on
05/16/2006 6:11:21 AM PDT
by
Rebelbase
(" Bush II: What's good for Mexico is good for America." --FReeper, Vigilanteman.)
To: kellynla
I like John O'Sullivan.
I disagree with him on this one.
25
posted on
05/16/2006 6:11:37 AM PDT
by
Alia
To: GeorgefromGeorgia
Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but frankly I am tired of one issue voters that thing that everyone that doesn't agree with them on a single issue is a RINO or RAT. Except -- Bush has proven over and over again that domestically, he's no conservative.
Your 'one issue' complaint seems specious, considering we're talking about the final straw that breaks the camel's back.
The ones that scare me are the "I back the Prez no matter what he does". That's a real independent thinker . . .
To: senorjosef
Last chance for el GOP. Bush has been a huge dissapointment.
Well now, Joe, I suspect you've another 'dissapointment' in your future.
27
posted on
05/16/2006 6:14:57 AM PDT
by
harrowup
(If you voted for President Bush, be loyal; if not, bite a rock.)
To: satchmodog9
I would not put too much hope on the Senate, there, it is every woman for herself. The only hope is the House Republicans, they did the right thing to impeach Clinton. Hopefully, they will hold their position, and least understand they are the only body of government where every member is up for election in November. Tancredo and King nearly admitted on CNN last night with the way things are shaking out with the President and his strangebedfellows, Kennedy, McCain and Vincente Fox, that no bill is better than any compromise with the Senate.
To: Alia
I disagree with him on this one. Well he's certainly right that 'omnibus' type bills that put several things together like this are done to pass unpopular legislation by wrapping it with popular bills.
What, exactly, do you disagree with?
To: nmh
Add this, you now have 6 million potential votes just waiting for citizenship. And they are going to get it just as soon as we look the other way.
During WWII the Japanese in our country were rounded up and held in detention until the end of the war. Yet it is impossible to round up Mexican trespassers in our country and send them back to Mexico we are told. Are we are being had again?
30
posted on
05/16/2006 6:16:46 AM PDT
by
ANGGAPO
(LayteGulfBeachClub)
To: avacado
This is a States' issue.Not real familiar with Article I, Section 8 of the US Constitution, are ya?
P.S. I, too, live in a border state.
31
posted on
05/16/2006 6:16:49 AM PDT
by
DuncanWaring
(The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
To: neodad
In a Dem controlled Senate, with Dem committee majorities, do any conservative judges even make it out of committee? Not during these moonbat times.
32
posted on
05/16/2006 6:17:12 AM PDT
by
Huck
(Hey look, I'm still here.)
To: Biblebelter
The only hope is the House Republicans, I agree completely.
I'm thinking it's time to nationalize this next election, using this issue.
To: GeorgefromGeorgia
"but what is the solution to the 11 million illegals in the country?"
not my problemo...
when someone breaks into your home, do you say, "heck since you're here, ya might as well stay?"
you might, I won't!
they got here...they figured out how to get here;
let them figure out how to go home!
there are planes, trains & buses leaving here evvvvvery day!
34
posted on
05/16/2006 6:19:04 AM PDT
by
kellynla
(Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
To: DuncanWaring
--- Not real familiar with Article I, Section 8 of the US Constitution, are ya? --- No I am not, but I will look it up later today. At any rate, NO FEDERAL TROOPS IN MY STATE! I do not care about any "Article!" Keep the Fed. Govt. out!
35
posted on
05/16/2006 6:19:21 AM PDT
by
avacado
To: avacado
Avacado.
It's obvious you are on the wrong side of the fence/wall right now.
36
posted on
05/16/2006 6:20:23 AM PDT
by
SR 50
(Larry)
To: neodad
Ever hear of judges? You do NOT want a Rat senate, regardless of what you think of the current crop and/or Bush.
This really isn't an option.
37
posted on
05/16/2006 6:20:24 AM PDT
by
LS
To: avacado
Here we go telling us that since we do not live on a border stat that we do not know what the He!! we are talking about. Well let me tell you what I know. The population of my Ky town is growing more Hispanic by each day. That would not bother me except that a very large majority of them do not speak English so that tells me that they did not get here with the State Department's blessing. Also, my family is exposed to people who have no records of immunization not to mention what kind of criminals are probably among us. And yes we have had murders committed by them. I agree with you that the current laws should be enforced but why should our government do it know when they have not been for 25 years? Look if you don't want a fence then you can come up here and get them yourself and take them back to their countries.
38
posted on
05/16/2006 6:21:05 AM PDT
by
reagandemo
(The battle is near are you ready for the sacrifice?)
To: avacado
Sorry but you're wrong. Federal Borders are the responsibility of the Federal Government. This isn't a states issue.
The Safety and Security of the Country is directly a Federally Constituted Responsibility. I.e. "Provide for the common defense".
39
posted on
05/16/2006 6:21:10 AM PDT
by
Leatherneck_MT
(An honest man can feel no pleasure in the exercise of power over his fellow citizens.)
To: avacado
I agree with you. But please keep all of the folks that jump the border in Texas, we have enough trouble here in the big city without them sponging off of us.
40
posted on
05/16/2006 6:22:35 AM PDT
by
ANGGAPO
(LayteGulfBeachClub)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 241-242 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson