Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Not Her Strong Suit [Katherine Harris]
The St. Petersburg Times ^ | 5/15/06 | Sharon Fink

Posted on 05/15/2006 7:24:51 PM PDT by zerelda

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-148 next last
To: zerelda

She's a little odd but compared to the wacked out dems it seems pretty simple. Nelson hasn't done a single positive thing to help this state out since he's been in office.


41 posted on 05/15/2006 8:06:27 PM PDT by driftdiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunkport

If it would get Greermurder off the bench, I'd vote for it


42 posted on 05/15/2006 8:06:48 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: digger48

I'd do her.


43 posted on 05/15/2006 8:06:50 PM PDT by TET1968
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bondjamesbond

Of course, fugure=figure.


44 posted on 05/15/2006 8:06:53 PM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (I can't complain...but sometimes I still do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunkport

I agree, Jeb has been a great Gov , but what he said was way weak .


45 posted on 05/15/2006 8:07:08 PM PDT by FRONTLINER (Katherine Harris for Senate '06 !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: digger48

Wow, Timmy likee!


46 posted on 05/15/2006 8:08:05 PM PDT by Holicheese (Stanley Cup's new home will be North Carolina!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: zerelda

Maybe I am a too open on these things but I really dont think her outfit is inappropriate. I suppose people are thing that fact the outfit shows she has breast makes this imappropriate. Well we know there there she isnt even showing any skin.


47 posted on 05/15/2006 8:08:05 PM PDT by catholicfreeper (Proud supporter of Pres. Bush and the Gop-- with no caveats, qualifiers, or bitc*en)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FRONTLINER
Not hate, and not based on being an envious female or a threatened male.

She just has not communicated that she is a strong, winning candidate in my judgment. She comes across as not ready for prime time. Those who have been closest to her politically for years have abandoned her.

Indeed, her presence makes Nelson look better in comparison. That's not the way to win. She will almost certainly lose.
48 posted on 05/15/2006 8:08:23 PM PDT by HitmanLV ("5 Minute Penalty for #40, Ann Theresa Calvello!" - RIP 1929-2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

You're wrong ! Nelson has made Algore look intelligent , a once impossible feat...


49 posted on 05/15/2006 8:08:51 PM PDT by FRONTLINER (Katherine Harris for Senate '06 !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: zerelda
I believe that the St. Petersburg Times is the same slime job that Bill O'Reilly talks about all the time. He has asked his viewers to boycott it for its sleaze tactics.
50 posted on 05/15/2006 8:08:52 PM PDT by fish hawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bondjamesbond

Looks similar to the lampshade depicted in "A Christmas Story"


51 posted on 05/15/2006 8:09:19 PM PDT by Windsong (Jesus Saves, but Buddha makes incremental backups)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: zerelda

Sounds like a stupid complaint to me. From the text, I expected her to look like a hooker. But the picture isn't bad.

This is someone making a mountain out of a...well, out of a...forget it.


52 posted on 05/15/2006 8:09:31 PM PDT by Mr Rogers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

The concept behind the story is silly. I ask you, would such nonsense be published if she were a man, or a Lib? She looks fine, wee little catty ones. Now may we discuss the issues in her senatorial campaign, please?


53 posted on 05/15/2006 8:09:50 PM PDT by Robwin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: FRONTLINER
Are we talking about Hillary ?

For sure - NOT! ;^)

54 posted on 05/15/2006 8:09:53 PM PDT by cricket (Live Liberal-free. . .or suffer the consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: corkoman

I don't really see anything wrong with the outfit. It's not stuffy and she wears it well.

The problem I have is some in the GOP have gone out of their way to cut her off at the knees. I'm not sure she is clean following Duke Cunningham but those in the know should give her a thumbs up or down. This death of 1000 cuts they have been giving her is not right. Who are these people that get to decide who gets the nod to run? Shouldn't it be determined at the polls? Geez I must be naive.


55 posted on 05/15/2006 8:09:58 PM PDT by Edison (I don't know what irks me more, whether they lied or the incompetence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: zerelda

She really should know better than open-toed shoes. That's probably the most commonly stated rule of professional dress.


56 posted on 05/15/2006 8:10:23 PM PDT by Young Scholar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HitmanLV

Ok, we will see in the debates where she will shred that Forrest Gump clone


57 posted on 05/15/2006 8:10:29 PM PDT by FRONTLINER (Katherine Harris for Senate '06 !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: catholicfreeper; zerelda

Good lord what was I thinking when I typed that. For those that dont read gibberish here I go again

Maybe I am a too open on these things but I really dont think her outfit is inappropriate. I suppose people are thinking that the fact the outfit shows she has breast makes this iappropriate. Well we know that they are there so whats the problem. She isnt even showing any skin.



58 posted on 05/15/2006 8:11:00 PM PDT by catholicfreeper (Proud supporter of Pres. Bush and the Gop-- with no caveats, qualifiers, or bitc*en)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: All


59 posted on 05/15/2006 8:11:37 PM PDT by monkapotamus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: fish hawk

Yes the SPT supported that slimeball prosecuter who refused to bring charges on ALL of the Jessica Lundsford murderers .


60 posted on 05/15/2006 8:12:10 PM PDT by FRONTLINER (Katherine Harris for Senate '06 !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-148 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson