Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/15/2006 8:33:13 AM PDT by jmc1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: jmc1969

Messers Ross and Esposito sound a little paranoid to me. Leakers and irresponsible reporters are just as much a threat to our national security as those islamo-freaks. I have no sympathy for any of them.


40 posted on 05/15/2006 8:51:12 AM PDT by Darlin' ("You said would I apologize for that?" Bush told him. "The answer is absolutely not.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmc1969
H.R.4922 (Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act-10/25/1994 Became Public Law)
41 posted on 05/15/2006 8:52:17 AM PDT by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmc1969

Oh puhleeze.


45 posted on 05/15/2006 8:54:28 AM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmc1969

I'm not ok with this. What if a dem wins next? I WANT whistleblowers calling the news networks on that administration. And so will you. Have a little foresight.


52 posted on 05/15/2006 8:56:59 AM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmc1969
"A senior federal law enforcement official tells us the government is tracking the phone numbers we call in an effort to root out confidential sources."
Surely the L/MSM will turn this around to make it look like the government is targeting the free press. And lots on the Hill and elsewhere will scream to the high heavens how unjust this administration is.
But perhaps the Intel Agencies and the L/MSM now realize leaks will be investigated. The freepress has a duty. And it obviously in so many cases has overstepped it's boundaries in issues of national defense.
At the same time I can see where it is a very competitive business. And the press would not get news if Intel/military did not leak stuff.
Who leaked, say to ABC, the news regarding CIA predator operations. Should they not also be investigated. This all is a two way street.
Quite complicated in many respects.
53 posted on 05/15/2006 8:58:26 AM PDT by Marine_Uncle (Honor must be earned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmc1969
I am sooooo far from being a computer maven but.....

With DIGITAL technology, the suspected phone numbers logs can be transcribed with a few clicks.

I'm glad the government has the means to track down treasonous b*stards....as long as it purely used in the War on Terror and not by just any police agency.

59 posted on 05/15/2006 8:59:43 AM PDT by DCPatriot ("It aint what you don't know that kills you. It's what you know that aint so" Theodore Sturgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmc1969
"It's time for you to get some new cell phones, quick," the source told us in an in-person conversation.

I think their source is a cell-phone salesman. :)
69 posted on 05/15/2006 9:04:44 AM PDT by P-40
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmc1969

Wow. So they are listening to me talking to Grandma. Gosh, I wonder if they are enjoying the weather talk, the aches and pains talks, the family gossip. Wow I am so nervous...lol.


74 posted on 05/15/2006 9:06:12 AM PDT by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmc1969
Federal Source to ABC News: We Know Who You're Calling

WHOM dammit!

81 posted on 05/15/2006 9:11:38 AM PDT by Mad Dawg (If you find yourself in a fair fight, you did not prepare properly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmc1969

Memo to ABC NEWS....Just because you are paranoid DOES NOT mean the feds aren't out to git ya'!! Write when you get your assigned cell number.


119 posted on 05/15/2006 10:16:42 AM PDT by geezerwheezer (get up boys, we're burnin' daylight!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmc1969

Gee, I guess they're really going to have to change future scripts for future police TV shows such as Law and Order where they constantly get the record of numbers dialed by a suspect from the phone company. Without a warrant.


140 posted on 05/15/2006 11:02:01 AM PDT by Binghamton_native
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmc1969

Starting w/ Dana Priest.


157 posted on 05/15/2006 11:41:05 AM PDT by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestu s globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmc1969

BTTT


182 posted on 05/15/2006 12:42:43 PM PDT by ADemocratNoMore (Jeepers, Freepers, where'd 'ya get those sleepers?. Pj people, exposing old media's lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmc1969

Hello, Everyone:

I'm chiming in here very late and haven't read the entire line of traffic, so apologies if I'm stepping on someone else's earlier observation . . .

Why should we take this post from Brian Ross at ABC News seriously? It's entirely possible that someone in the Fed is pulling his chain just for fun or to make Mr. Ross think that he is more important than he really is. Why aren't we hearing about these kind of mysterious warnings to other crack media investigative reporters at CBS, NBC, the New York Times, in other words the usual gang of suspects? Come on, now. If I was a nervous Fed with inside information, why would I try to protect only Brian Ross?


192 posted on 05/15/2006 5:02:31 PM PDT by drsbb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson