Skip to comments.
Judge orders San Diego cross removed
World Net Daily ^
| 05-03-06
| WestVirginiaRebel
Posted on 05/03/2006 6:33:06 PM PDT by WestVirginiaRebel
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 last
To: WestVirginiaRebel
41
posted on
05/03/2006 7:26:48 PM PDT
by
cabojoe
To: cabojoe
As Andrew Jackson (I believe) said, "The Court has made it's decision, now let them come down here and enforce it "
42
posted on
05/03/2006 8:21:42 PM PDT
by
Robe
(Rome did not create a great empire by talking, they did it by killing all those who opposed them)
To: CindyDawg
43
posted on
05/03/2006 8:23:30 PM PDT
by
newzjunkey
(Don't use illegals: HIREPATRIOTS.COM)
To: Always Right
How is it going to be payable to the US Treasury? The Mt Soledad cross was designated a national war memorial. The San Diego voters decided over 70% to give the land to the national park service.
The city has tried multiple times to sell the land and each time a court has nullified the sales.
44
posted on
05/03/2006 8:26:11 PM PDT
by
newzjunkey
(Don't use illegals: HIREPATRIOTS.COM)
To: WestVirginiaRebel
I'm waiting for the ACLU lawsuit to start changing city names like "San Diego", "San Francisco", "St. Louis", etc. because they are named after religious figures....
It's only a matter of time...
To: montag813
Very true but they have been getting away with this since Justice Hugo Black haunted the Supreme Court.. Congress needs to jerk their chains but they are too busy jerking something else...
46
posted on
05/03/2006 8:30:36 PM PDT
by
lawdog
To: newzjunkey
So I've learned tonight. If my son was reading this I'm sure I would get a "moooooooottttttther" :')
To: montag813
people need to begin calling the Mayor and Governor....cause, I doubt they'll act on their own.
To: Mannaggia l'America
It is inevitable that cross markers will be outlawed in national cemetaries.
49
posted on
05/03/2006 8:42:10 PM PDT
by
Kirkwood
To: pointsal
A group should buy the property across the street from Judge Gordon Thompson's house and erect the cross on it!!
50
posted on
05/03/2006 8:44:52 PM PDT
by
HardStarboard
(Get legal or get out!)
To: WestVirginiaRebel
90 days is plenty of time for the city to sell a tiny plot of land -- including the "footprint" of the cross -- to an interested (Christian) private party who wants to maintain the landmark.
51
posted on
05/03/2006 9:17:45 PM PDT
by
TXnMA
(Remember the Alamo! Remember Goliad! Repeat San Jacinto!)
To: TXnMA
Trouble is that the sales keep getting nullifed -- WHY? If Pfizer came along and wanted the city to condemn the cross site for an office center (viz. Kelo) there wouldn't be a problem. Not even if Pfizer wanted to keep the cross there.
To: traviskicks
53
posted on
05/04/2006 2:16:57 AM PDT
by
freepatriot32
(Holding you head high & voting Libertarian is better then holding your nose and voting republican)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
