Posted on 04/23/2006 4:33:56 PM PDT by wardaddy
Unfortunately, for the United States, that will be 40 years too late.
rut row
Did you read the article Dean? The leaders of the SBC are concerned about illegals. They can evangelize them all they would like and should help any in need. Then they can carry their new found faith back to Mexico and El Salvador with them when they reapply for some temporary landscape worker visa from Guerrero or Michoacan or Acajutla or wherever. My church ministers heavily in Sierra Leone where I once lived but that doesn't mean they are offering blanket amnesty immigration for all of Sierra Leone to move here en masse. Ministry has no borders but has to respect those of which those doing the ministering are citizens and the nations where they minister. Christ spoke at length about respect for law...draw your own conclusions from that as you wish.
Verdad.....nosotros neccisitamos ese hombre voltar aqui ahora...listo!
Cuidado para todos Quislings y FROBLs!
Yes Wardaddy, I did read the article, now are you going to be true to your political rhetoric on FR and drum this Hispanic minister out of the SBC for preaching to illegal aliens.
Nobody said it couldn't happen or that some of them aren't nuts.
You just can't do it with tens of millions of them coming all at once, carrying with them a litany of grievances nurtured and inculcated in them from childhood by the sick Mexican "government".
And the minute you simply shrug and say, "what laws? we don't need no steenking laws?" and hand out amnesties, then you are in Mexico.
Nice swastika. I wonder how many liberal, Jewish Democrats sympathize with the Aztlan nutters. I wonder if any realize just how racist they really are.
That is right.....raised in Argentina of sorta socialist family that had lost their wealth but still had rich kinfolks which afforded Che a cool lifestyle. Spanish-Irish
is right.
Argentines are sorta snotty about indios....they think of Mexicans as riff raff unless it's soap star genes.
They consider themselves the coolest of the latinos yet white Cubans might argue that.
Latin America is much more racial about shades than here...subtle differences create turmoil in families
But no, I do not support this latino preacher's stand on illegals but he may proselytize to whom he wishes....that is between him and God
And also, IMO, between you and God for your posting a picture of a family eating lunch together and implying that is evil.
Low-fired pottery bowl from the Banshan Culture
Majiawan Village, China Neolithic Period (2165-1965 BCE)
Large central swastika probably intended to symbolize a sun wheel.
Excerpts: "A marker of the sun's travels, it can be seen on Pictish rock carvings, adorning ancient Greek pottery, and on ancient Norse weapons and implements. It was scratched on cave walls in France seven thousand years ago. A swastika marks the beginning of many Buddhist scriptures, and is often inciused on the soles of the feet of the Buddha in statuary. In the Jain religion, it is a symbol of the seventh Jina (Saint), the Tirthankara Suparsva. To Native Americans, the swastika is a symbol of the sun, the four directions, and the four seasons ...
Long before the symbol was co-opted as an emblem of Hitler's Nazi party, it was a sacred symbol to Hindu, Jain, and Buddhist religions, as well as in Norse, Basque, Baltic, and Celtic Paganism."
Commies and Reconquistas even if they eat lunch at picnic tables with their kiddies and sing kumbaya under the moonlight are still evil...Hitler loved dogs and Stalin liked children on his knees. Remember Saddam holding babies?
according to my world view and observations....they are bad news to my culture and way of life...sorta like RINOS and appeasers.
but, if you find Che worshippers and Azatlan Nazis so inviting....why not join your kinfolks fown there?
Wow......it's amazing to watch you in action.....drunk over Matt's banning ......you are so emotive reasoning chick-liberal....no wonder the hyena posse loves you so. You must be their master DNA....like the queen Borg or something.
But....I LOVE YOU JUST THE SAME....ANYHOW.....UNCONDITIONALLY!
I am well aware that the swastika is an ancient symbol; however, its meaning has been permanently changed for anyone in a Western nation. Posturing aside, the "Aztlan" activists are as Western as any other Americans. (Yes, the vast majority of these activists are Natural-born U.S. Citizens. Did you notice that >90% of their signs, tee-shirts, and other trinkets are in English?) It is not a "sun wheel" to them. It is the symbol of the Nazi Party to them. Its use is deliberate.
A veritable "Fiesta de m*erda"!
Or how about the romanticized images of, say, "Sub-Comandante Marcos of Chiapas Mexico fame," meant to evoke passion ... without any real substance.
They don't "own" the swastika/fylfot cross anymore than they own the continent.
In this case, and I'm not talking about the rest of the imagery being used, I'd say you are wrong. THe swastika is the proper orientation (the Nazis reversed it) and it's with some other symbols (like the cross.) I don't think it's meant in the National Socialist way at all, even if there is a lot of leftist or ethnic tribal-socialism being promoted there.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.