I know, I know ... you already read this tomorrow.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
To: PatrickHenry
I time travelled just this past Sunday morning - it was 2:00 AM and suddenly it was 3:00 AM. I plan to make the return trip sometime this fall.
To: PatrickHenry
Okay, I'm in. I've just got to do something about that vote for Jimmy Carter...
96 posted on
04/04/2006 11:23:50 AM PDT by
rightinthemiddle
(Islamic Terrorists, the Mainstream Media and the Democrat Party Have the Same Goals in Iraq.)
To: PatrickHenry
"
While his team still needs funding for the project...."
Ah! so the truth emerges....
97 posted on
04/04/2006 11:24:06 AM PDT by
azhenfud
(He who always is looking up seldom finds others' lost change.)
To: PatrickHenry
The Lottery will be a thing of the past...
100 posted on
04/04/2006 11:25:23 AM PDT by
rightinthemiddle
(Islamic Terrorists, the Mainstream Media and the Democrat Party Have the Same Goals in Iraq.)
To: PatrickHenry
I have already seen the future. You don't want to go there.
101 posted on
04/04/2006 11:26:17 AM PDT by
OB1kNOb
(America is the land of the free BECAUSE of the BRAVE !!)
To: PatrickHenry
Time travel would have no effect on OUR history whatsoever. Because if it will ever exist, the travelers have already had their effect. You are in the future of the time travelers to the past.
I guess no time travelers decided to save JFK or stop 9/11.
But on the other hand, maybe they prevented the nuclear war that immediately followed the Cuban Missle crisis.
To: PatrickHenry
"ATTN! Present TD? This is Future TD: If you had been working and
not farting around on FR, they wouldn't have fired us."
Jeepers, I gotta go . . .
106 posted on
04/04/2006 11:30:30 AM PDT by
tumblindice
(If you think hard enough you can transform yourself into pure energy, but it's really draining.)
To: PatrickHenry
Unless there are an INFINITE number of simultaneous realities and/or time travel is possible in only one direction [the future] we would already have knowledge of it. For those in the future would have come back to the past [now or before the present] and demonstrated it!
I would imagine there would also have to be limits on travel in either or both directions otherwise one could scr.w themselves. [really-actually and literally]
107 posted on
04/04/2006 11:31:58 AM PDT by
PISANO
(We will not tire......We will not falter.......We will NOT FAIL!!! .........GW Bush [Oct 2001])
To: PatrickHenry
120 posted on
04/04/2006 11:44:48 AM PDT by
Sam Cree
(absolute reality) - ("Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one." Albert Einstein)
To: PatrickHenry
Ow! Ow! Ow! It kills! My pack! Ow! Turn it off! It's a piece of crap and it doesn't work!
To: PatrickHenry
125 posted on
04/04/2006 11:46:03 AM PDT by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It. Supporting our Troops Means Praying for them to Win!)
To: PatrickHenry
Even better than time travel - we will move totally out of time and into Eternity....
135 posted on
04/04/2006 11:53:15 AM PDT by
trebb
("I am the way... no one comes to the Father, but by me..." - Jesus in John 14:6 (RSV))
To: PatrickHenry
Did he have Florida or UCLA in the National Championship?
140 posted on
04/04/2006 11:56:37 AM PDT by
nickcarraway
(I'm Only Alive, Because a Judge Hasn't Ruled I Should Die...)
To: PatrickHenry
cool, do I get Frequent Flyer miles?
To: PatrickHenry
So he goes back, saves his dad, loses his motive for inventing a time machine, and then what?
154 posted on
04/04/2006 12:44:41 PM PDT by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
To: PatrickHenry
167 posted on
04/04/2006 12:59:40 PM PDT by
Tokra
(I think I'll retire to Bedlam.)
To: PatrickHenry
To: PatrickHenry
To: PatrickHenry
What if he went back to Israel in say, 30 AD?
190 posted on
04/04/2006 2:47:14 PM PDT by
mjp
To: PatrickHenry
I'm sure it's already been said; but I can say it if I want to.
IF time travel were possible, we would have already met those people from that time of invention who traveled back to our time or earlier.
191 posted on
04/04/2006 2:50:10 PM PDT by
bannie
(The government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend upon the support of Paul.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
