Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is it time for a constitutional convention called by the people re: illegal immigration?

Posted on 03/27/2006 5:46:36 PM PST by Jim Robinson

Edited on 03/27/2006 8:53:53 PM PST by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 421-431 next last
To: RHINO369; Jim Robinson

I'm an electrical engineer with experience in lighting, security and outdoor power distribution design. I'll kick in my time too.


41 posted on 03/27/2006 6:01:42 PM PST by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convention_to_propose_amendment_to_U.S._Constitution

http://www.answers.com/topic/convention-to-propose-amendment-to-u-s-constitution

http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/dcom/olia/tmcybpiracy/haguecomments.pdf

Hope this helps


42 posted on 03/27/2006 6:01:54 PM PST by stopem (Call any co you deal with and insist they not let any illegal work on or near your property, we did!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Can you see a 1700 page Constitution?


43 posted on 03/27/2006 6:02:52 PM PST by bennowens
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

There are two routes for constitutional change. One is a specific-language amendment passed by 2/3ds of both houses and 3/4ths of the states. It is limited to the exact language of the amendment.

The other is a constitutional convention. Once a constitutional convention is, well, convened, the entire constitution is subject to change. That is a BAD idea. Think of the potential for the left: delete the 2nd, delete parts of the 1st; add express right to abortion; ERA; gay marriage; etc.

BAD idea.


44 posted on 03/27/2006 6:03:12 PM PST by Petronski (I love Cyborg!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
In California, we had a bill pass in the state legislature regarding illegal immigration supported by more than 70% of voters. A judge threw it out. That is what will happen on a national basis too. I cant stand Arlen Specter, but he made a point today that should be noticed, which is that there is no enforcement mechanism in place to use in the case of a border enforcement bill. We are not going to deport 13 million people, under any circumstances. There is no political will for that in Government. Short of that, what can we do besides hope to gain some benefit by at least registering and tracking these people?
45 posted on 03/27/2006 6:03:15 PM PST by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache; If mere words can anger you, that means you can be controlled by much less effort.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Slightly off-topic, but what Bush doesn't realize is that even all those hard-working, just-want-to-support-my-family mexicans etc.

are being daily and hourly ORGANIZED by COMMUNIST groups, and since they are from socialist countries,

they'll VOTE SOCIALIST at any opportunity.

So even the honest types are BEING EXPERTLY ORGANIZED by every socialist/communist group in America. They are slaving away at "groups", at making posters, at organizing central committees as I type.


46 posted on 03/27/2006 6:03:35 PM PST by squarebarb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Do not dub me shapka broham

What we need is decent, likable politician like GWB, that ALSO wants to clamp down on the border.

Jeb, you listening???


47 posted on 03/27/2006 6:03:46 PM PST by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

The main Constitutional problem is anchor babies. Aside from that, there are plenty of laws on the books already that could be, but aren't, or are selectively, enforced.


48 posted on 03/27/2006 6:04:19 PM PST by RightWhale (pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


the problems:


the solutions:



lock & load America!

#1 - defund the government

they obviously do not enforce taxation of non-citizens

49 posted on 03/27/2006 6:04:29 PM PST by devolve ( Reload/Refresh the updated new Slick Willie graphic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
I think most of the states are currently "red" states (maybe someone will post "the map?"). Now might be the least risky time to attempt something like this.

While I can appreciate that sentiment, I don't believe we have sufficient population of honorable leaders who I would trust to have the power to completely rewrite the Constitution. Even my own fair Commonwealth is sorely lacking in this regard.

Remember: Once a Constitutional Convention is called, there are no limits on what can be proposed, or on what can be altered.

Do you trust the Republican party of today to handle the Constitution in this manner?

I know I don't. And the problem exists from THE TOP DOWN!

50 posted on 03/27/2006 6:04:57 PM PST by detsaoT (Proudly not "dumb as a journalist.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

later read


51 posted on 03/27/2006 6:05:36 PM PST by Mo1 ("Stupidity is also a gift from God, but it should not be abused." Pope John Paul II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Thanks for the post Jim

Methinks.... we should simply read the Preamble....
word for word....

The part that says:
We the people [citizens] of the United States of America.....and

...and preserve the blessings of liberty for OURSELVES... and OUR POSTERITY....

Yes = oversimplified.... but something like that!

Blessings

52 posted on 03/27/2006 6:05:52 PM PST by Wings-n-Wind (The answers are out there; Wisdom is gained by asking the right questions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

I don't know if we need a Constitutional Convention for this.

We already have the laws in place.

We need to get the balls to enforce them. Maybe some stricter language defining the penalties for repeat offenders, employers who knowingly employ illegals, etc, but a Constitutional Convention would be a zoo I'm afraid.


53 posted on 03/27/2006 6:05:54 PM PST by MikefromOhio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson; All

Here's what's on the menu.. so far.

-----

A Look at Major Immigration Proposals

The Associated Press

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060328/ap_on_go_co/immigration_glance;_ylt=AqRWKGfyBYOJX37tebfT90ayFz4D;_ylu=X3oDMTA5aHJvMDdwBHNlYwN5bmNhdA--

Highlights of major immigration proposals in Congress:

___
___

Senate Judiciary Committee's bill:

_Allows illegal immigrants who were in the United States before 2004 to continuing working legally for six years if they pay a $1,000 fine and clear a criminal background check. They would become eligible for permanent residence upon paying another $1,000 fine, any back taxes and having learned English.

_New immigrants would have to have temporary work visas. They also could earn legal permanent residence after six years.

_Adds up to 14,000 new Border Patrol agents by 2011 to the current force of 11,300 agents.

_Authorizes a "virtual wall" of unmanned vehicles, cameras and sensors to monitor the U.S.-Mexico border.

_Creates a special guest worker program for an estimated 1.5 million immigrant farm workers, who can also earn legal permanent residency.

___
___

Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist's proposal:

_Requires all employers to verify the identity and immigration status of their employees through an electronic system.

_Assesses civil penalties of between $500 and $20,000 against employers for each illegal immigrant they hire and criminal penalties of up to $20,000 per illegal immigrant hired and up to six months in jail for engaging in a pattern of employing illegal workers.

_More than doubles the number of employment-based green cards, from 140,000 to 290,000, and makes more employment based visas available to unskilled workers. It also would free up other visas by exempting immediate relatives of U.S. citizens from being counted in the annual pool of 480,000 visas, and increase country-by-country ceilings on family sponsored and employment-based immigrants.

_Cancels visas of immigrants who have overstayed their visas and requires them to return to their home country to undergo additional screening at U.S. consulates.

_Makes it a misdemeanor crime for an immigrant to be in the country illegally.

_Increases the number of visas available for high-tech workers.

_Does not address President Bush's proposal for a guest worker program.

___
___

House bill passed in December:

_Requires all employers to use within six years a database to verify Social Security numbers of employees or face civil or criminal penalties for hiring illegal workers.

_Requires mandatory detention for all non-Mexican illegal immigrants arrested at ports of entry or at land and sea borders.

_Establishes mandatory sentences for smuggling illegal immigrants and for re-entering the United States illegally after deportation.

_Makes illegal presence in the country a felony.

_Makes a drunken driving conviction a deportable offense.

_Requires building two-layer fences along 700 miles of the 2,000-mile border between Mexico and the United States.

_Does not address President Bush's proposed guest worker program for illegal immigrants already in U.S.


54 posted on 03/27/2006 6:06:01 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Monthly Donor spoken Here. Go to ... https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

I don't know. On the one hand, something really must be done about illegal immigration. On the other, a constitutional convention at this point in our history could be like opening pandora's box.

We might go into it with the goal of solving the illegal immgrant problem, and come out with gay marriage and a pro-abortion amendment to the constitution.


55 posted on 03/27/2006 6:06:33 PM PST by Old_Mil (http://www.constitutionparty.org - Forging a Rebirth of Freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wings-n-Wind

It clearly has become a taxation without representation thing for we the people.


56 posted on 03/27/2006 6:07:10 PM PST by cripplecreek (Never a minigun handy when you need one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: pissant
I'll vote for Lyndon LaRouche before I vote for anyone whose last name is Bush.

Which is to say, I'll never vote for anyone with that surname.

Besides, if George is a full-blown LULAC/La Raza booster, his brother Jeb is an outright Mechista.

Elevating him to the Oval Office-which thank goodness, will never happen-would be the equivalent of giving Manuel Obrador Lopez the keys to Air Force One.

57 posted on 03/27/2006 6:07:50 PM PST by Do not dub me shapka broham ("The moment that someone wants to forbid caricatures, that is the moment we publish them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
"A Convention for Proposing Amendments...as Part of This Constitution"
58 posted on 03/27/2006 6:07:53 PM PST by Publius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
I can't stress enough that this must, MUST be handled on a State-by-State basis.

The FEDERAL government is beyond all control. Abandon ANY hope of the yahoos in Washington doing ANYTHING to help you.

Call your State Delegate and Senator, and press them to start following in Georgia's footsteps. It is our ONLY hope!

59 posted on 03/27/2006 6:08:19 PM PST by detsaoT (Proudly not "dumb as a journalist.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Do not dub me shapka broham

Jeb will win hands down if he runs.

And GWB is a great President, IMO.


60 posted on 03/27/2006 6:09:37 PM PST by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 421-431 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson