Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chertoff Defends Review of Ports Takeover
Yahoo News ^ | FEB.19, 2006 | WILL LESTER

Posted on 02/19/2006 8:44:08 AM PST by radar101

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 181-187 next last
To: radar101

Chertoff is building a personal history...So if he is for it, good Americans should be against it...His history teaches us that...


121 posted on 02/19/2006 11:12:31 AM PST by Iscool (Start your own revolution by voting for the candidates the media (and gov't) tells you cannot win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eskimo

"What would you say to those who believe that with respect to the political reality that your trust has been foolishly given"?


I would say that President Bush has won TWO battles in the WOT, Afghanistan and Iraq.

I would say that he has recruited many nations to our cause.

I would say that we HAVE NOT been attacked since 9/11, because of actions directly taken by his administration.

I would say that EVERY Military friend I have fighting today, is fighting under a CIC that THEY trust.

I would also say that you ALL are wrong!

LLS


122 posted on 02/19/2006 11:16:28 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (Preserve America... kill terrorists... destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: baseballmom

ping


123 posted on 02/19/2006 11:17:13 AM PST by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: takenoprisoner
Remove Chertoff now! Only a traitor would present this deal as legit.

That's like telling NY voters to reject Hillary Clinton's staff but go ahead and keep Hillary...

124 posted on 02/19/2006 11:22:15 AM PST by Iscool (Start your own revolution by voting for the candidates the media (and gov't) tells you cannot win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer
I would say that President Bush has won TWO battles in the WOT, Afghanistan and Iraq.

I would say that he has recruited many nations to our cause.

I would say that we HAVE NOT been attacked since 9/11, because of actions directly taken by his administration.

I would say that EVERY Military friend I have fighting today, is fighting under a CIC that THEY trust.

I would also say that you ALL are wrong!

Well, I guess they would conclude that reality is not you friend.

125 posted on 02/19/2006 11:22:31 AM PST by eskimo (Political groupies - rabid defenders of the indefensible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
"Amazing how naive some "Conservatives" are... Notice how this whole story is based on rumor and guilty by association... There are NO facts actually presented here...the company has ZERO security function"

In the drawl of Ron White, Bullshe ete. The article below says different.

DP World to invest in port security BY JAMILA QADIR 8 December 2005

DUBAI — DP World, currently in a huge buying spree, is planning to invest in security issues at the ports and terminals it owns and manages around the world, according to a senior company official. Mahmood Amin, head of security department at DP World, said yesterday that the company was planning to invest in security issues at its ports and terminals in the future, adding that DP World is investing “millions of dirhams” in security every year. He said while Dubai ports are secure and have not witnessed any cases related to terrorism or any other crimes, the new additions to the DP World’s portfolio will require more cash injections. Meanwhile, it was revealed yesterday that air cargo, which is loaded into passenger aircraft is neither checked nor screened by airports and airlines. Moreover, only five per cent of shipping containers that move around the world are actually checked, according to David Wood, managing director of International Business Events, the organisers of Airport, Port and Transport Security Middle East (APTS ME) conference and exhibition. Speaking ahead of the second edition of the conference that will take place in Dubai on April 3 and 4, he said that security issues in the region were on the rise given the current expansion projects taking place in the Gulf countries. He said while the conference would address emerging issues like immigration, e-passports, biometrics and intelligence systems, it would also have a dedicated conference focusing on the supply chain security (SCS) sector and cargo. The Middle East logistics industry, according to industry forecasts, is expected to grow at over 25 per cent annually. SCS has become an important component of business and the lack of an adequate SCS programme can significantly impact business. “The region is an important global trading hub, with the UAE being the world’s third most important re-export centre. It needs to ensure the safety and security of goods that are transported through its ports and other terminals,” he suggested.

126 posted on 02/19/2006 11:26:56 AM PST by takenoprisoner (Afterall, American ports run by muslims is a good thing right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter

BUMP


127 posted on 02/19/2006 11:31:47 AM PST by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer
Man, I have been a Conservative ACTIVE in politics for 51 years. I have worked for FOUR successful Republican Presidential campaigns.

Well, there's your problem; you haven't come to the realization yet that the GOP has been been sold to politically socialist, oportunistic parisites who plan to suck America dry to satiate their own greed. Pay attention!

128 posted on 02/19/2006 11:37:12 AM PST by eskimo (Political groupies - rabid defenders of the indefensible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: radar101

if the administration insists on advocating this - then they deserve to have the political wolves come after them, and it will be bi-partisan in nature, congresional inquiries, whatever it takes.

I personally think the companies involved will retreat from the acquisition deal this week.


129 posted on 02/19/2006 11:37:49 AM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
DP World has said it intends to "maintain and, where appropriate, enhance current security arrangements."

Somewhat of an odd statement if what you say is true...DP seems to think it has control of security...

The UAE's foreign minister has described his country as an important U.S. ally in fighting terrorism.

Plus, the UAE has given us ample reason to know they are telling a bit of a lie right here...

130 posted on 02/19/2006 11:40:36 AM PST by Iscool (Start your own revolution by voting for the candidates the media (and gov't) tells you cannot win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: radar101

The Department of Homeland Security was created at the behest of the Rand Corporation and CSIS, not by the American people, and it doesn't appear to operate in our interests.


131 posted on 02/19/2006 11:40:52 AM PST by hedgetrimmer ("I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radar101

Chertoff is an asshat.


132 posted on 02/19/2006 11:40:54 AM PST by DoNotDivide (Romans 12:21 Be not overcome of evil, but overcome evil with good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

Hmm. Clinton holdover?

The position he holds didn't exist under Clinton. Besides, I think the next time a cabinet level position is held over from administration to administration will be the first.


133 posted on 02/19/2006 11:41:34 AM PST by WickD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: WickD

The position didn't exist, but Chertoff worked in the Clinton administration.


134 posted on 02/19/2006 11:43:07 AM PST by LucyT (It's 72 white grapes; it never was 72 virgins: http://www.chiesa.espressonline.it/dettaglio.jsp?id=7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer
"I do not want this DUTCH/UAE company to run the six ports in question, if there is a real security threat."

If you would simply step back a moment and remove your dubya blinders, you will clearly see a real and present danger of major proportions with muslims running our strategic ports. And no, it is not true this is a paper only involvement. And no, it matters zero nada zilch if it were only on paper, (which it is not) since what is means in the case IS operational HANDS ON functions at our strategic ports...including security.

Ask yourself, what profit seeking company would make a paper deal of 6.8 bill and not be hands on in it's day to day operations? I'd argue a soon to be bankrupt company.

DP world does port security

135 posted on 02/19/2006 11:43:09 AM PST by takenoprisoner (Afterall, American ports run by muslims is a good thing right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Vn_survivor_67-68

Chertoff is a total tool...I agree...never liked him as a choice...never will...he has got to go. He lives in La La Land especially concerning the arrogant approach he has towards the borders.


136 posted on 02/19/2006 11:46:10 AM PST by My Favorite Headache ("Scientology is dangerous stuff,it's like forming a religion based around Johnny Quest and Haji.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Borax Queen
I will believe Chertoff and Homeland Insecurity (on any topic) the day hel# freezes over. Lying keystone cops at worst, bumbling bureaucrats at best.

Remember a couple weeks ago when Chertoff/Bush announced they had ended "catch and release"? They did! It's now catch, PROCESS, and release.

The Ugly offspring of Catch & Release: Catch, Process,Release

[snip] Rep. Steve Pearce,(R),(2/7/06) New Mexico questioned Aguilar. “The secretary (Homeland Security Michael Chertoff) said we are going to stop the catch and release program. [a friend of Pearce] Judge Carter recently went to one of the detention centers where OTM’s were being processed. Carter asked how long they are going to be here. He was told ‘til they are “processed”.

The judge commented to the official that he thought we were through with catch and release and was told, “We are. It’s now catch, process and release.”

Pearce asked Aguilar, “ Are we actually catching and releasing or catching, processing and releasing?”

Aguilar answered, “ We are moving toward catch and remove”.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1581177/posts Post 17

137 posted on 02/19/2006 11:46:14 AM PST by WatchingInAmazement ("Nothing is more expensive than cheap labor," prof. Vernon Briggs, labor economist Cornell Un.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: All

We have some folks here trying desperately to hoodwink us. I don't understand their motive less it be dubya can do no wrong, or worse, they actively support terrorists seeking the destruction of these United States.

I voted for and continue to support Pres. Bush in the war in Iraq. However, this port issue is bizzarre to say the least, and gives me great pause. There is no justification for allowing muslims(all potential terrorists moderate or not) to be involved in any measure regarding our strategic ports.

We must continue to resist by screaming bloody murder at our congress critters.


138 posted on 02/19/2006 11:57:26 AM PST by takenoprisoner (Afterall, American ports run by muslims is a good thing right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Vn_survivor_67-68

Barnard Kerik has taken the exact same position.


139 posted on 02/19/2006 12:01:22 PM PST by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard (Mohammad's da bomb.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer
What in my opinion deserves such abhorrent remarks to a fellow Conservative? Disagree yes, but you treat me as if I were ted kennedy.

I think this was it:

You align with clinton and schumer.
140 posted on 02/19/2006 12:07:36 PM PST by kenth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 181-187 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson