Skip to comments.
Space Survival
Living on Earth ^
| 02/17/06
Posted on 02/18/2006 1:38:21 PM PST by KevinDavis
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
To: RightWhale; Brett66; xrp; gdc314; anymouse; NonZeroSum; jimkress; discostu; The_Victor; ...
2
posted on
02/18/2006 1:38:40 PM PST
by
KevinDavis
(http://www.cafepress.com/spacefuture)
To: KevinDavis
It all sounds great, except that Greenpeace, the Sierra Club and a host of other organizations will do everything in their power to use the courts to prevent us from "besmirching the pristine nature of Mars" by ever attempting to grow anything on it.
To: KevinDavis
I remember when KJZZ was an AM jazz radio station in the Seattle area.
4
posted on
02/18/2006 1:41:31 PM PST
by
r9etb
To: beezdotcom; All
5
posted on
02/18/2006 1:44:40 PM PST
by
KevinDavis
(http://www.cafepress.com/spacefuture)
To: beezdotcom
If people ever get there (the biggest challenge), then there is nothing at all that a terrestrial agency, government or private, that will have the means to stop the colonists from doing whatever they want to do. Unless Greenpeace sends minions that outnumber colonists, then they can do nothing at all to them.
6
posted on
02/18/2006 1:46:47 PM PST
by
Laz711
(The Barbarians are in Rome)
To: KevinDavis
Very cool.
The future of space colonization requires a technology in which people can live in an entirely closed system. No need for replenishments of of air, water or food -- everything is recycled.
There's no other way, IMO.
7
posted on
02/18/2006 1:47:15 PM PST
by
BenLurkin
(O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
To: beezdotcom
It all sounds great, except that Greenpeace, the Sierra Club and a host of other organizations Well I don't know about the others, but how could GREENpeace be against turning the Red Planet green?
8
posted on
02/18/2006 1:48:00 PM PST
by
AFreeBird
(your mileage may vary)
To: BenLurkin; All
9
posted on
02/18/2006 1:48:02 PM PST
by
KevinDavis
(http://www.cafepress.com/spacefuture)
To: Laz711
If people ever get there (the biggest challenge), then there is nothing at all that a terrestrial agency, government or private, that will have the means to stop the colonists from doing whatever they want to do.
I expect that the first private company to offer homesteading trips to Mars (I doubt NASA will ever get that far) will have injunctions filed against them to prevent them from launching. (Or, at the rate things are going, by then the local mullah will just have the CEO beheaded).
To: KevinDavis
Hard to believe those Mars rovers are still performing. They must be a year over their expected life.
To: beezdotcom
It is possible, but, if some companies are able to get that far, who will stop them from preparing anyway? The most likely vessel to go to mars will have to be built in orbit anyway, they could just leave with all they need and not come back, or not tell anyone that they are going to stay there, just go and study. But I think that it will be different than that. Either way, with the technology at hand, people will go with or without government approval.
12
posted on
02/18/2006 2:00:02 PM PST
by
Laz711
(The Barbarians are in Rome)
To: Laz711; All
That is true.. When it does happen, look for a brian drain to happen.. I mean why should the best the brightest should stay on this rock when they have the chance to go someplace better...
13
posted on
02/18/2006 2:10:21 PM PST
by
KevinDavis
(http://www.cafepress.com/spacefuture)
To: KevinDavis
Seemingly touched with a load of luck from the giddy-up, Opportunity has been galloping since she strutted off of her lander, some 670 sols ago. A mission planned for 90 days has turned into an adventure that's lasted nearly two Earth years!Link
Amazing. With just a little effort on our part, no one will catch us in space exploration.
14
posted on
02/18/2006 2:14:41 PM PST
by
Flyer
(Send Beer)
To: AFreeBird
Well I don't know about the others, but how could GREENpeace be against turning the Red Planet green?
Simple. If there's so much as a microbe on Mars (like maybe, desert varnish, they'll want the whole planet declared a wilderness area.
To: Laz711
Either way, with the technology at hand, people will go with or without government approval.
I sincerely hope you're right. But when I look at how the envirowhackos contributed to the death of Columbia by haranguing NASA until they changed the foam to a more "environmentally friendly" (and less stable) version, I begin to wonder if there's ANYTHING they can't foul up.
To: Laz711
Unless Greenpeace sends minions that outnumber colonists, then they can do nothing at all to them. Even if Greenpeace could afford to send minions into space, it would take technology to get them there. This is why Greenpeace's space activities have been limited to waving Earthbound protest signs at NASA's nuclear probe launches.
To: KevinDavis
I don't want NASA talking about going back to to the moon as they have. Mars would really excite me though.
To: beezdotcom
That would be correct. The 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty already prohibits any use of celestial bodies as they call the planets and asteroids and the moon. Nothing like a colony would get off the ground.
19
posted on
02/18/2006 4:00:58 PM PST
by
RightWhale
(pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
To: Semper Paratus
NASA's first new robotic missions to the moon will commence launching in 2008.
20
posted on
02/18/2006 4:02:09 PM PST
by
RightWhale
(pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson