Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House Defends Port Sale to Arab Co.
Associated Press/Breitbart ^ | 2-16-2006 | By TED BRIDIS and DEVLIN BARRETT

Posted on 02/16/2006 1:40:18 PM PST by Stellar Dendrite

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-283 next last
To: Stellar Dendrite

And Bush's last vestiges of conservatism go right out the window...


41 posted on 02/16/2006 2:13:36 PM PST by Dead Corpse (I believe that all government is evil, and that trying to improve it is largely a waste of time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Esther Ruth

I guess you would rather state an opinion before you had any information.


42 posted on 02/16/2006 2:16:52 PM PST by Don'tMessWithTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Stellar Dendrite

"The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, run by the Treasury Department, reviewed an assessment from U.S. intelligence agencies. The committee's 12 members agreed unanimously the sale did not present any problems, the department said."

Obviously this secret committee on foreign investment in the US is made up of arab muslims. Since no red blooded freedom lovin American in his right mind could possibly conceive this sale as not a potential threat to our national security at a time when we are at war with some arab muslims.

beam me up scotty


43 posted on 02/16/2006 2:17:10 PM PST by takenoprisoner (Afterall, American ports run by muslims is a good thing right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JessieHelmsJr

Even on immigration? How about government spending? The expanded size of government? Do you agree with the continued shrinking of our military personnal?


44 posted on 02/16/2006 2:19:07 PM PST by em2vn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Stellar Dendrite

lol I guess Dane has the day off...


45 posted on 02/16/2006 2:21:50 PM PST by ovrtaxt (Join the FR folding team!! http://vspx27.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/main.py?qtype=teampage&teamnum=36120)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: RoadTest

"I wonder how much that cost the Arabs per committee person?"

Dang just when I figured the committe must be made up of arabs you come along with this multi million dollar bribe scheme. yessiree that'll git er done.



46 posted on 02/16/2006 2:21:57 PM PST by takenoprisoner (Afterall, American ports run by muslims is a good thing right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Don'tMessWithTexas
Amamzing that these same people on this thread screeching that Bush is a traitor didn't say one word about the British(non-American) company selling it interest.

JMO, the screeching ones on this thtread are either textbook knee jerkers or chuckie schumer sycophants.

47 posted on 02/16/2006 2:23:12 PM PST by Dane ( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: All
"Does this pose a national security risk? I think that's pushing the envelope," said Stephen E. Flynn, who studies maritime security at the New York-based Council on Foreign Relations. "It's not impossible to imagine one could develop an internal conspiracy, but I'd have to assign it a very low probability."

Changing management over the U.S. ports "doesn't offer al-Qaida any opportunities it doesn't have now," said James Lewis, who worked with the U.S. committee at the State and Commerce departments. "It's in Dubai's interest to make sure this runs well. There is strong economic incentive to be sure these worries never materialize."

Flynn and others said even under foreign control, U.S. ports will continue to be run by unionized American employees. "You're not going have a bunch of UAE citizens working the docks," Flynn said. "They're longshoremen, vested in high-paying jobs. Most of them are Archie Bunker-kind of Americans."

Peninsular and Oriental and DP World set approval by the U.S. security committee as a condition for the sale. In regulatory papers, the companies said either the committee must agree not to formally investigate the purchase or Bush must not move to block the sale for national security purposes.

http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,635183828,00.html


48 posted on 02/16/2006 2:29:56 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: takenoprisoner
And of course the Moose-limb lovin' shills in the National Security Council, the same agency that we actually trusted to monitor AQ communications to the US, have been bought by the Arab terrorists that also bought out this committee.

Oh Brother!

49 posted on 02/16/2006 2:30:26 PM PST by Don'tMessWithTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

Doesn't matter if the Feds run the Port Security or not. I have to disagree with you on this.

NO Foreign country should be running OUR ports in ANY capacity.


50 posted on 02/16/2006 2:36:27 PM PST by Leatherneck_MT (An honest man can feel no pleasure in the exercise of power over his fellow citizens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Don'tMessWithTexas
Damned tyrannical dictators forcing the people to investigate them after they cr** on us all!
Yea, that's my opinion!
51 posted on 02/16/2006 2:36:52 PM PST by Esther Ruth (I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee - Genesis 12:3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Stellar Dendrite

The international zone at Jebel Ali is one of the best run ports one could hope to find. These people know how to run a port.


52 posted on 02/16/2006 2:38:15 PM PST by BlueNgold (Feed the Tree .....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stellar Dendrite

What a disaster this would be to allow our ports to be run by foreign interests. For once I will have to agree with Schumer's comments.


53 posted on 02/16/2006 2:38:52 PM PST by NY Attitude (You are responsible for your safety until the arrival of Law Enforcement Officers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Don'tMessWithTexas

The only reason Schumer, Laut, and the RINOs are upset about this is because the government isn't running the ports.

I am upset for a completely different reason. They don't care WHO it was sold to, they just care that it was sold to a private company.


54 posted on 02/16/2006 2:41:06 PM PST by Carling (Your Super Bowl XL Champion Pittsburgh SteAlers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: anyone

Questions:

1. What does "commercial Operations" mean? Is is import/export facilities, warehouses, etc.?

2. Does this in anyway change the Security Operations of the ports involved? If so how?

Thanks if anyone can provide how this process would work.

55 posted on 02/16/2006 2:47:21 PM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

I would take issue with the representation that there's no way to stop this unless it can be shown that DP World gave false evidence or withheld vital details. Information on the Committee's website states quite clearly that the President retains the authority to make the decision.

http://www.ustreas.gov/offices/international-affairs/exon-florio/

Granted, I gave it a rather cursory reading, and there may be other statutory issues. But, my take is that this Committee is an advisory body who investigates and recommends, but does not issue the actual decision. The President does.


56 posted on 02/16/2006 2:50:12 PM PST by Eroteme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Stellar Dendrite

Grover Norquist Jr? Did that Arabist bag man have anything to do with it? He should have been barred from DC back on 9/12/01.


57 posted on 02/16/2006 2:51:59 PM PST by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
February 12, 2006 - By TED BRIDIS

Last month, the White House appointed a senior DP World executive, David Sanborn of Virginia, as new administrator of the Maritime Administration of the Transportation Department. Sanborn worked as DP World's director of operations for Europe and Latin America.

http://www.sweetness-light.com/archive/arabs-to-control-six-us-ports/


"the U.S. Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) meets in secret and is headed by Treasury Secretary John Snow. In 2004, DP World purchased part of the American company CSX [CSX World Terminals, the international terminals business owned by CSX] for over $1 billion. Before he became Treasury Secretary, John Snow was Chairman and CEO of CSX.

Follow the money.
58 posted on 02/16/2006 2:52:54 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sabramerican

LMFAO!!!!!!!!


59 posted on 02/16/2006 2:56:32 PM PST by Stellar Dendrite (There's nothing "Mainstream" about the Orwellian Media!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Don'tMessWithTexas

"Anytime Schumer, Lautenberg and RINOs are opposed to something, I am suspicious."


So Tom Coburn is a RINO now?


60 posted on 02/16/2006 2:58:19 PM PST by Stellar Dendrite (There's nothing "Mainstream" about the Orwellian Media!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-283 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson