Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No End to Questions in Cheney Hunting Accident
New York Times ^ | 2/14/06 | Anne Kornblut and Ralph Blumenthal

Posted on 02/14/2006 3:25:39 AM PST by advance_copy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-109 next last
To: gridlock

complimentary coffee and danish? i hope it's from denmark


61 posted on 02/14/2006 4:32:49 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: advance_copy

This never had to be the furor it has become. Hunting accidents happen. If Joe SixPack shoots Joe Blow while hunting, it gets a mention that evening on the local news. I think as much as he would like to be, Cheney is not Joe SixPack. Had the Vice President of the United States of America come forward right away, maybe a new conference at the hospital that night with the obligatory "I feel so bad right now" people would have felt sympathy immediately for Cheney for having hurt his friend as well as Whittington, the victim.


62 posted on 02/14/2006 4:33:06 AM PST by DaGman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: advance_copy
The White House sought with little success on Monday to quell an uproar over why it took the better part of a day to disclose that Vice President Dick Cheney had accidentally wounded a fellow hunter in Texas on Saturday

I didn't realize that the White House was required to do the media's job for them.

63 posted on 02/14/2006 4:34:04 AM PST by kevkrom ("...no one has ever successfully waged a war against stupidity" - Orson Scott Card)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DustyMoment
;)





64 posted on 02/14/2006 4:34:41 AM PST by G.Mason (Duty, Honor, Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: newnhdad
Their egos are the real story in this non-story, story.

Good point!! Most of us hadn't considered that aspect of this nonsense.
65 posted on 02/14/2006 4:34:45 AM PST by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
complimentary coffee and danish? i hope it's from denmark

The White House Press Corp would probably insist that they be called "Mohammadan Pastries" for fear of offending the Muzzies.

66 posted on 02/14/2006 4:35:11 AM PST by gridlock (eliminate perverse incentives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: advance_copy
On Monday, a news release from the sheriff's office said that "Mr. Whittington's interview collaborated Vice President Cheney's statement" and that the department was "fully satisfied that this was no more than a hunting accident."

"Collaborated"? Are they selectively quoting from the sheriff's news release to imply this is a Freudian slip or something?

67 posted on 02/14/2006 4:35:53 AM PST by King of Florida (A little government and a little luck are necessary in life, but only a fool trusts either of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: advance_copy
From another story, the local sheriff was notified about an hour after the incident occurred. Where was the stringer for the local media? The press must have known the Veep's schedule ... do they know so little about hunting that they assumed it was safe not to have a member of the press covering the party? Where was the photographer waiting to snap the pic of the Veep carrying out his bag of birds? (or, his manservent carrying the bird ... oh, wait that was the great white belly hunter). No, the MSM is in a tizzy because their vaunted news gathering machine was exposed as weak by this one, so expect much strum und drang so that no one notices.

Oh, and why didn't FR break this one? Jim Rob, please investigate :)

68 posted on 02/14/2006 4:36:16 AM PST by NonValueAdded ("If I were a Cuban, I'd certainly be on a raft," Isane Aparicio Busto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kevkrom
I didn't realize that the White House was required to do the media's job for them.

There was a time when any reporter passing along press accounts from the White House would be derided as a "Rip and Read" mindless tool of the Powers That Be. Today's blow-dried pretty boys insist on the privledge.

69 posted on 02/14/2006 4:37:40 AM PST by gridlock (eliminate perverse incentives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: gridlock
I much prefer to have a story 24 hours after the fact about how the blow-dried Press Corp didn't get this story served up with their complementary coffee and danish in the White House Press Room than having to endure a death vigil at the hospital and hours of shaky video of Prima Donna Pretty Boys out tramping through the fields looking for bloody grass.

Then you would be part of a very small minority. Had there been a Breaking News thread from the get-go, this place would have been on fire.

70 posted on 02/14/2006 4:39:52 AM PST by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: gridlock
Some media sycophants don't remember a day when men were not expected to have an Oprah moment, tell all, cry, apologize, ect, and create policy and behave according to the NYT editorial page.

This President is serving during a time when some are being weened from the DNC/MSM, and those media/political organizations are furious that they are not the gatekeepers anymore.

The paper in Texas reported this on their web site Sunday morning, per the reporter.

Complainers always find something to complain about. Always.
71 posted on 02/14/2006 4:43:12 AM PST by roses of sharon ("I would rather men ask why I have no statue, than why I have one". ) (Cato the Elder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: DaGman; All

"This never had to be the furor it has become."

Unfortunately it did have to become the furor it did. Why? The answer is simple. This is the administration the MSM loves to hate. They will do and say anything to put this administration in a bad light.

Here is a question that I think most of us know the answer to. Suppose we change the names of the people involved here to Al Gore, Joe Lockhart and this event happened during the Clinton era. Do you think this story would have been the big deal it is now? Do I need to answer that? Didn't think so!


72 posted on 02/14/2006 4:43:43 AM PST by dmw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
And continuous speculation by friends of Cheney on exactly why the news didn't get out

The news did get out.

I promise you, if the media had been alerted immediately rather than the following day, they'd have come up with another angle to express outrage against the Vice President.

73 posted on 02/14/2006 4:44:09 AM PST by alnick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: advance_copy
"the public's right to know"....


74 posted on 02/14/2006 4:48:23 AM PST by Fenris6 (3 Purple Hearts in 4 months w/o missing a day of work? He's either John Rambo or a Fraud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon; cardinal4

David Gregory is a leprous, toilet-dwelling toad. He absolutely snarls when he has to mention the president's name.


75 posted on 02/14/2006 4:48:59 AM PST by Ax (Guards! Seize that man!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Ax
Hatred is unbecoming. And David proves that everyday.
76 posted on 02/14/2006 4:52:26 AM PST by roses of sharon ("I would rather men ask why I have no statue, than why I have one". ) (Cato the Elder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: newnhdad
Their egos are the real story in this non-story, story.

DING, DING, DING, DING. WE HAVE A WINNER!!
Again, it's all about them. What a pile of losers.

77 posted on 02/14/2006 4:55:30 AM PST by fedupjohn (If we try to fight the war on terror with eyes shut + ears packed with wax, innocent people will die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Shocked2

It would only make him MORE of a liberal icon. The jerk is the Helen Thomas of his generation and deserves the same amount of serious consideration.


78 posted on 02/14/2006 4:57:38 AM PST by RetSignman (( HELP...I'm trapped between these curved things))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: mal

"I'm reluctant to disparage John Podhoretz as some effete metrosexual Ethel Merman impersonator..."

He didn't do such a bad job fiting that description in his 2/10/06 op ed 'The Cartoon Wars R-E-S-P-E-C-T' in the NYPost.

"Prudent" John is why I haven't bought that paper since then.

Though for the record he may be a jot cuter than "The Merm".


79 posted on 02/14/2006 4:59:25 AM PST by TalBlack (I WON'T suffer the journalizing or editoralizing of people who are afraid of the enemies of freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cornpone

For goodness sake, it was birdshot- big deal.


80 posted on 02/14/2006 5:04:58 AM PST by bronxboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-109 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson