Posted on 02/11/2006 1:56:55 PM PST by george76
Chick is so freakin' hot. I can't even imagine - she target shoots, is conservative, and just blistering hot.
Man.
Who needs civility? Seriously. I can't believe the same caca that Dashle was shoveling the day he lost the Senate is the same caca we are trying to sell other Republicans.
They aren't interested. Find the most strict originalists you can and hand them gavels. We might just have something left of the republic in 20 years.
Still looking for a fight?
Why don't you try and attack some liberals for a change?
And I DO fight liberals. I just don't care for it when people like you make unprovoked attacks as you did on fellow freepers...........especially when they are completely irrational and make no sense, whatsoever.
Stop whining and defend your arguments with logic. Why did you use the "Phil Donahue" attack on Big Sky when it had nothing to do with what was said?
If we can't use logic and reason on this forum, then we won't have much firepower against the liberals, will we? If we make unwarranted attacks on other freepers, (as you have done several times on this thread alone), we negate our ability to defend ourselves against our REAL foe.
If you are truly interested in fighting leftists and the cancer in our culture, stop making petty, irrational attacks on other conservatives on this forum.
And stop blaming me for what YOU are doing.
I don't believe that 'all's well that ends well' if it reveals in us an ugliness and deceit, and complete lack of emotional control, and that's what the Miers incident did.
Her resignation and President Bush's subsequent nomination of Alito (who was on his short list and ready to go), was a good thing..........a VERY good thing. But the behavior on this forum was childish and vicious, and those who behaved in that manner are now gloating that it was a good thing, and that they, themselves were responsible for what happened.
That, to me, is a joke. The morons on this forum who were yelling and screaming had absolutely NO impact on the change of nominees. And neither did Ann Coulter.
"..you make unprovoked attacks as you did on fellow freepers...........especially when they are completely irrational and make no sense, whatsoever" "Stop whining" "stop making petty, irrational attacks on other conservatives on this forum."
"And stop blaming me for what YOU are doing."
And - Why did you use the "Phil Donahue" attack on Big Sky when it had nothing to do with what was said?
1. My post was to "Big Sky" -not you. He doesn't need you to respond for him.
2. Calm down or start re-taking your medicine.
3. Don't expect another response.
It's quite clear that you are unable to defend yourself intellectually, so that you have to insult others due to your own inadequacy. I've tried here, rc, but you keep letting me down.
These things are good to find out about freepers in dealing with them in the future.
Note to self......stay away from rcocean. He's extremely sensitive, easily offended, and lacks the capacity for intelligent debate.
btw.......don't expect another response.
She also "lightly" trashed GWB in connection with the Miers nomination with her nasty dig about his drinking days.
Sad to say, but Ann is turning into a right-wing version of MoDo. Smarter and funnier to be sure, but still nasty, venomous, and full of cheap shots. Like MoDo, Ann also seems to be getting more bitter as time goes on.
Bitterness is a good explanation. I suppose a lifetime of sarcasm and insults begins to take its toll on even the brightest among us. Ann needs to turn this train around before she is relegated to the dustbin of irrelevance.
goodbye
Not apparent from your posts. Your posts have a party-above-principle GOP Big Tent/RNC flavor which prevent me from buying your "solid conservative" claim.
"I have nothing to fear from anonymous ignorant attacks like yours because I am very secure in knowing how very conservative I am."
The words of someone who doesn't sound all that secure.
" I guarantee you that the holier than thou conservatives on this forum are not as consistently conservative as I am."
By "holier than thou conservatives" I take it you are referring to those true conservatives who refuse to elevate party above principle. That does not include the pretend-conservatives who worship at the GOP Big Tent/RNC party-above-principles shrine. Your posts exclude you from the first group, your "guarantee" notwithstanding.
"Your assumptions are making you look foolish."
Not as foolish as your posts are making your conservative claims look.
"You'd better stop while you're behind......"
This is one of those times when it would be wise for you to take your own advice.
In other words it had NOTHING to do with what I said. Remember this rc, one of the rules of this forum are when you speak of someone in your post, it's courtesy to ping them. Now just move on from here, you're not making any headway in your current direction ocean.
too late
I'm tempted to ask you, "How did you DO that??" I mean........how did you get every word wrong? Every single word!
That must take practice. You done good.
btw, real conservatives don't get everything wrong, Czarina........ I don't think you're what you claim to be......but I guarantee that I AM consistently conservative, and have been for pretty close to 50 years.........that would be from the time I started caring about politics, and before I started 6th grade.
Thanks for the laugh, though. Pseudos like you always amuse me. You emote well, but your thought process is in dire need of retooling.
I know. You should be ashamed.
Spewing lots of words to all four corners is no substitute for compiling the posting record of a true conservative. Unfortunately, no matter how much you blather on, none of it alters that posting record.
Try to remember that convincng yourself that you are "consistently conservative" is not the same thing as persuading the rest of us.
Tell me, o wise one...........in what area am I NOT conservative, and give a link to the post(s) where you can prove it.
I think you're making this whole thing up based on your PERCEPTION of my 'posting record,' because it's certainly not based on reality. You're either badly misinformed, or your a bald faced liar. I prefer to think that you're clueless, because I'd rather not think that you're deliberately lying right here on a forum where the facts can be proven.
(P.S. being in love with Ann Coulter is NOT a proof of conservatism).
btw, I read Phyllis Schlafly when I was 14 years old, and haven't changed since. How about you?
I'm interested in seeing what you come up with. My 'posting record' is cleanly conservative, because that's who I am......top to bottom, start to finish, inside and out.
Give me the links, please, that you come up with, of posts that prove I'm not who I say I am. I've got five years' worth of evidence...... this actually could be fun...... for ME that is.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.