Skip to comments.
Samuel Alito ~ Senate Judiciary Hearing [LIVE THREAD] (Day-4)
Senate Judiciary ^
| 1-12-06
| Senate Judiciary
Posted on 01/12/2006 5:14:27 AM PST by OXENinFLA
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,641-1,660, 1,661-1,680, 1,681-1,700 ... 3,401-3,406 next last
To: stocksthatgoup
Leahy just said that the President's actions will come before the Supreme Court
In W's words... BRING IT ON!
1,661
posted on
01/12/2006 10:07:46 AM PST
by
JFC
(W, I am with YA)
To: stocksthatgoup
Leahy wants to be sure Alito will be a check and balance? And I want to be sure Leahy doesn't leak anymore.
1,662
posted on
01/12/2006 10:07:54 AM PST
by
pepperhead
(Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
To: demkicker
1,663
posted on
01/12/2006 10:08:06 AM PST
by
auboy
To: BigSkyFreeper
LOL! My kind of brother-in-law
To: cgk
Shades of clintoon speech. Say whatever you want, as long as you are a RAT. Why let facts get in the way?
To: conservativebabe
Senator DEPENDS: "You and I both know that the President is not above the law."
What kind of idiotic, pandering, sophmoric blather is that?
1,666
posted on
01/12/2006 10:08:30 AM PST
by
King David
(SCOTUS.... it's not just for liberals anymore.)
To: Do not dub me shapka broham
omg
1,667
posted on
01/12/2006 10:08:40 AM PST
by
Howlin
(Defeatism may have its partisan uses, but it is not justified by the facts. - GWB, 12/18/05)
To: cgk
Leahy's just cheesed because Miers' withdrawl meant that they had to deal with Alito. Heh heh heh.
1,668
posted on
01/12/2006 10:08:49 AM PST
by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: conservativebabe
They remind me of that lackadaisical student who keeps asking for an extension on his paper, even though he realizes that it won't do him any good.
To: Lizarde
1,670
posted on
01/12/2006 10:09:11 AM PST
by
jackv
(just shakin' my head)
To: cgk
They couldn't find a coherent thought between them.
To: mewzilla
Did Sen Spectre endorse Alito or not?
1,672
posted on
01/12/2006 10:09:14 AM PST
by
Broker
(COD Phlyer)
To: stocksthatgoup
Leahy wants to be sure Alito will be a check and balance?Hey Leaky?!? He'll be "The Gavel", as in Sammy "The Gavel" Alito.
1,673
posted on
01/12/2006 10:09:21 AM PST
by
BigSkyFreeper
("Tucker Carlson could reveal himself as a castrated, lesbian, rodeo clown ...wouldn't surprise me")
To: Do not dub me shapka broham
1,674
posted on
01/12/2006 10:09:52 AM PST
by
AliVeritas
(DNC - The longer the nose, the more we expose. No Costco, it's Sam's Club for me.)
To: Howlin
To: Broker
He didn't say but I'm sure he will. Much as I don't trust Specter, he knows what'll happen if he goes against the nominee.
1,676
posted on
01/12/2006 10:10:21 AM PST
by
ilovew
("We are living through a watershed moment in the story of freedom." GWB 12-14-05)
To: easonc52
To: AliVeritas
Is this lunch? What time are they returning?
To: pillut48
"Last time I checked, *SHE* withdrew her name, not President Bush."
You're right. Leahy's WRONG!
Leahy's a prime candidate for a mental health check.
To: pillut48
Last time I checked, *SHE* withdrew her name, not President Bush. Technically, probably both. She can't order a nomination in or out, so she expresses to the President "out," and he expresses to the Senate "out."
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,641-1,660, 1,661-1,680, 1,681-1,700 ... 3,401-3,406 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson