Skip to comments.
Rush Limbaugh: Who Leaked NSA Information?
RushLimbaugh.com ^
| December 21, 2005
| Rush Limbaugh
Posted on 12/21/2005 5:45:39 PM PST by wagglebee
Edited on 12/21/2005 6:16:42 PM PST by Admin Moderator.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Is it just me, or has Rockefeller gone from being just another multi-millionaire liberal to a major pain in the ass and a traitor in the past few years?
1
posted on
12/21/2005 5:45:41 PM PST
by
wagglebee
To: MNJohnnie; AliVeritas
2
posted on
12/21/2005 5:46:06 PM PST
by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: Calpernia
Don't know if you heard this today or not, but Rush believes that Jay Rockefeller is the source of the NSA leaks.
3
posted on
12/21/2005 5:46:58 PM PST
by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: wagglebee
Just became a member of Rush's website I love it watching him on my wireless laptop in my truck during the day it's awesome.
4
posted on
12/21/2005 5:47:44 PM PST
by
NYjarcola
To: NYjarcola
There's laws most places about watching movies/computer casts while driving! -:)
5
posted on
12/21/2005 5:49:12 PM PST
by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: wagglebee
Clinton's Intimate Amigos (i'm sure you are already familiar w/ Wilson & Plame)
6
posted on
12/21/2005 5:50:19 PM PST
by
chilepepper
(The map is not the territory -- Alfred Korzybski)
To: wagglebee
Rush hinted at this yesterday. I believe that he is right. Unfortunately we will never know because Rockie's toadies in the Liberal "media" will NEVER investigate a 'RAT. They are after President Bush.
7
posted on
12/21/2005 5:50:51 PM PST
by
FlingWingFlyer
(We did not lose in Vietnam. We left.)
To: wagglebee
I've long thought Rockefeller has been behind numerous leaks.
I usually give Senators the benefit of the doubt of at least being an educated person. Rockefeller doesn't quite seem to have a whole lot going on upstairs.
Just stupid enough to think he could do this without repercussions.
8
posted on
12/21/2005 5:53:43 PM PST
by
digger48
To: wagglebee
Is it just me, or has Rockefeller gone from being just another multi-millionaire liberal to a major pain in the ass and a traitor in the past few years?He's always been a major pain in the ass and a traitor. It's just that when you're the junior senator to Uberporkmeister Bob Byrd, you're pretty much guaranteed to spend your entire senatorial career flying under the radar.
To: wagglebee
The Rockefellers have ALWAYS been traitors, IMAO, even the Republican side.
They are part of the liberal ELITE, the pampered ones, the Bertha Betterthanyou in the Amen Pew, the haute cotre, the....
Awwww, never mind...they wouldn't pi$$ on you if you were on fire..
but, I feel the same way about them.
10
posted on
12/21/2005 5:59:16 PM PST
by
concretebob
(We should give anarchists what they want. Then we can kill them and not worry about jailtime.)
To: digger48
Rockefeller is an heir to one of the largest fortunes in the history of the world, it may very well be a much larger fortune than people realize due to the fact that so much of the wealth is hidden in trusts going back nearly a century. So it may not be stupidity as much as the real possibility that there have NEVER been repercussions for ANYTHING he has ever done in his life.
http://www.opensecrets.org/pfds/pfd2004/N00001685_2004.pdf
11
posted on
12/21/2005 6:00:10 PM PST
by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: NYjarcola
OK need your route so I can avoid you..hehehe
12
posted on
12/21/2005 6:01:25 PM PST
by
concretebob
(We should give anarchists what they want. Then we can kill them and not worry about jailtime.)
To: wagglebee
He's already openly admitted to tipping off Syria about the Iraq invasion and now this.
He's the leaker, but it doesn't mean he's the only one.The NYT claimed what, a dozen sources?
13
posted on
12/21/2005 6:03:16 PM PST
by
smoothsailing
(68-69NamVet-NEVER FORGET)
To: wagglebee; NYjarcola
I heard this today while working..one of the perks of my job is the ability to catch most, if not all, of Rush's show while I'm working..
I had to stop while he was reading that email..
I'm also a Rush 24/7 member..but I can't afford the wireless bill.
14
posted on
12/21/2005 6:04:32 PM PST
by
concretebob
(We should give anarchists what they want. Then we can kill them and not worry about jailtime.)
To: wagglebee
I would believe that because Rockefeller knows nothing will happen to him even if he's caught.
To: wagglebee
(a) Whoever knowingly and willfully communicates, furnishes, transmits, or otherwise makes available to an unauthorized person, or publishes, or uses in any manner prejudicial to the safety or interest of the United States or for the benefit of any foreign government to the detriment of the United States any classified information— (1) concerning the nature, preparation, or use of any code, cipher, or cryptographic system of the United States or any foreign government; or
(2) concerning the design, construction, use, maintenance, or repair of any device, apparatus, or appliance used or prepared or planned for use by the United States or any foreign government for cryptographic or communication intelligence purposes; or
(3) concerning the communication intelligence activities of the United States or any foreign government; or
(4) obtained by the processes of communication intelligence from the communications of any foreign government, knowing the same to have been obtained by such processes—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
(b) As used in subsection (a) of this section— The term “classified information” means information which, at the time of a violation of this section, is, for reasons of national security, specifically designated by a United States Government Agency for limited or restricted dissemination or distribution;
The terms “code,” “cipher,” and “cryptographic system” include in their meanings, in addition to their usual meanings, any method of secret writing and any mechanical or electrical device or method used for the purpose of disguising or concealing the contents, significance, or meanings of communications;
The term “foreign government” includes in its meaning any person or persons acting or purporting to act for or on behalf of any faction, party, department, agency, bureau, or military force of or within a foreign country, or for or on behalf of any government or any person or persons purporting to act as a government within a foreign country, whether or not such government is recognized by the United States;
The term “communication intelligence” means all procedures and methods used in the interception of communications and the obtaining of information from such communications by other than the intended recipients;
The term “unauthorized person” means any person who, or agency which, is not authorized to receive information of the categories set forth in subsection (a) of this section, by the President, or by the head of a department or agency of the United States Government which is expressly designated by the President to engage in communication intelligence activities for the United States.
(c) Nothing in this section shall prohibit the furnishing, upon lawful demand, of information to any regularly constituted committee of the Senate or House of Representatives of the United States of America, or joint committee thereof.
(d) (1) Any person convicted of a violation of this section shall forfeit to the United States irrespective of any provision of State law— (A) any property constituting, or derived from, any proceeds the person obtained, directly or indirectly, as the result of such violation; and
(B) any of the person’s property used, or intended to be used, in any manner or part, to commit, or to facilitate the commission of, such violation.
(2) The court, in imposing sentence on a defendant for a conviction of a violation of this section, shall order that the defendant forfeit to the United States all property described in paragraph (1).
(3) Except as provided in paragraph (4), the provisions of subsections (b), (c), and (e) through (p) of section 413 of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970 (21 U.S.C. 853 (b), (c), and (e)–(p)), shall apply to— (A) property subject to forfeiture under this subsection;
(B) any seizure or disposition of such property; and
(C) any administrative or judicial proceeding in relation to such property,
if not inconsistent with this subsection.
(4) Notwithstanding section 524 (c) of title 28, there shall be deposited in the Crime Victims Fund established under section 1402 of the Victims of Crime Act of 1984 (42 U.S.C. 10601) all amounts from the forfeiture of property under this subsection remaining after the payment of expenses for forfeiture and sale authorized by law.
(5) As used in this subsection, the term “State” means any State of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and any territory or possession of the United States.
16
posted on
12/21/2005 6:06:36 PM PST
by
xcamel
(a system poltergeist stole it.)
To: wagglebee
has Rockefeller gone from being just another multi-millionaire liberal to a major pain in the ass and a traitor in the past few years? He's always been a traitorous s.o.b. If anything he's been keeping a lower profile for the past 8-10 years but he's never ever to be trusted!
17
posted on
12/21/2005 6:09:20 PM PST
by
Bernard Marx
(Don't make the mistake of interpreting my Civility as Servility)
To: wagglebee
Proof positive that money don't buy beauty OR brains.
18
posted on
12/21/2005 6:10:15 PM PST
by
digger48
To: caisson71
19
posted on
12/21/2005 6:10:49 PM PST
by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: NYjarcola
I'm not a member, so I couldn't read the article. Is Rush's site free membership?
20
posted on
12/21/2005 6:12:34 PM PST
by
sageb1
(This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson