Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: veronica

That's nice, except Libby isn't charged with leaking the information, but rather, he was charged with lying to prosecutors and the DA about something that wasn't a crime in the first place. The fact that someone else might have leaked the name is irrelevant.


2 posted on 11/17/2005 5:13:59 AM PST by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: Labyrinthos

The Fitz man painted a picture of Libby eagerly telling anyone who would listen that Plame worked for the CIA and that it wasnt widely known....

Woodward's comments pokes a giant hole in that theory. And we still dont know who told Novak.


241 posted on 11/17/2005 12:32:15 PM PST by BurbankKarl (NRA EPL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Labyrinthos
Let's say you are charged with robbing a bank - you didn't do it, but you are accused anyway. As part of the case, you give the alibi that you were at the Quickie-Mart getting a Squishy, but the security camera clearly finds that you poured yourself a cup of coffee - it was three years ago and you weren't sure. You are immediately charged with lying, but not charged with robbing the bank. That's pretty much the case.
314 posted on 11/17/2005 5:39:48 PM PST by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Labyrinthos
Fitzy still hasn't proven that Libby "lied".

For all Fitzy knows, Russert is the liar. But he indicted Libby. The case is built on sand.

326 posted on 11/17/2005 6:09:34 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson