To: veronica
That's nice, except Libby isn't charged with leaking the information, but rather, he was charged with lying to prosecutors and the DA about something that wasn't a crime in the first place. The fact that someone else might have leaked the name is irrelevant.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-24 last
To: Labyrinthos
The Fitz man painted a picture of Libby eagerly telling anyone who would listen that Plame worked for the CIA and that it wasnt widely known....
Woodward's comments pokes a giant hole in that theory. And we still dont know who told Novak.
To: Labyrinthos
Let's say you are charged with robbing a bank - you didn't do it, but you are accused anyway. As part of the case, you give the alibi that you were at the Quickie-Mart getting a Squishy, but the security camera clearly finds that you poured yourself a cup of coffee - it was three years ago and you weren't sure. You are immediately charged with lying, but not charged with robbing the bank. That's pretty much the case.
314 posted on
11/17/2005 5:39:48 PM PST by
SERKIT
("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.....)
To: Labyrinthos
Fitzy still hasn't proven that Libby "lied".
For all Fitzy knows, Russert is the liar. But he indicted Libby. The case is built on sand.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-24 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson