Skip to comments.
Senate Approves Cuts to Social Programs (Cutting $36B in Spending!)
Fox News ^
| November 03, 2005
| AP
Posted on 11/03/2005 3:32:35 PM PST by HHKrepublican_2
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180, 181-200, 201-220, 221-240 last
To: lormand
221
posted on
11/04/2005 1:44:34 PM PST
by
lormand
(Dead people vote DemocRAT)
To: HHKrepublican_2
Did they make an actual cuts, or just a cut in the rate of future spending?
222
posted on
11/04/2005 4:22:07 PM PST
by
rawhide
To: HHKrepublican_2
I'll believe it when it crosses Bush's desk.
223
posted on
11/04/2005 7:55:21 PM PST
by
newzjunkey
(CA: YES on Prop 73-77! Unions outspending Arnold 3:1, HELP: http://www.joinarnold.com)
A good start. But $36 billion is a drop in the bucket compared to the unexpected expenses of Katrina, and to the new drug benifit. We need to cut some more fat out.
Comment #225 Removed by Moderator
To: HHKrepublican_2
We must remember that "cuts" in programs mean that the average taxpayer will have more money in his own pocket.
Now let's see Congress cut foreign aid (out), pork, perks,corporate welfare subsidies, farm subsidies, and do away with the IRS and institute a fair tax plan.
BTW it's a myth that tax cuts benefit only the wealthy - for two reasons.
1. The true wealthy pay only a tiny percent of the total money government takes in in taxes. The largest percent is paid by the middle class - that's where the money is. If government confiscated every cent from every rich person the government could operate only about 24 hours.
2. The people who tell us that tax cuts benefit only the rich are themselves wealthy and know better. By this reasoning, since only the rich benefit, no one gets a tax break.
The big trick is to reserve to government the right to define who is "rich." Anyone "out there" making over the poverty level of around $24,000 for a family of four, is defined by the tax grabbers as rich.
To: HHKrepublican_2
We must remember that "cuts" in programs mean that the average taxpayer will have more money in his own pocket.
Now let's see Congress cut foreign aid (out), pork, perks,corporate welfare subsidies, farm subsidies, and do away with the IRS and institute a fair tax plan.
BTW it's a myth that tax cuts benefit only the wealthy - for two reasons.
1. The true wealthy pay only a tiny percent of the total money government takes in in taxes. The largest percent is paid by the middle class - that's where the money is. If government confiscated every cent from every rich person the government could operate only about 24 hours.
2. The people who tell us that tax cuts benefit only the rich are themselves wealthy and know better. By this reasoning, since only the rich benefit, no one gets a tax break.
The big trick is to reserve to government the right to define who is "rich." Anyone "out there" making over the poverty level of around $24,000 for a family of four, is defined by the tax grabbers as rich.
To: HHKrepublican_2
We must remember that "cuts" in programs mean that the average taxpayer will have more money in his own pocket.
Now let's see Congress cut foreign aid (out), pork, perks,corporate welfare subsidies, farm subsidies, and do away with the IRS and institute a fair tax plan.
BTW it's a myth that tax cuts benefit only the wealthy - for two reasons.
1. The true wealthy pay only a tiny percent of the total money government takes in in taxes. The largest percent is paid by the middle class - that's where the money is. If government confiscated every cent from every rich person the government could operate only about 24 hours.
2. The people who tell us that tax cuts benefit only the rich are themselves wealthy and know better. By this reasoning, since only the rich benefit, no one gets a tax break.
The big trick is to reserve to government the right to define who is "rich." Anyone "out there" making over the poverty level of around $24,000 for a family of four, is defined by the tax grabbers as rich.
To: HHKrepublican_2
We must remember that "cuts" in programs mean that the average taxpayer will have more money in his own pocket.
Now let's see Congress cut foreign aid (out), pork, perks,corporate welfare subsidies, farm subsidies, and do away with the IRS and institute a fair tax plan.
BTW it's a myth that tax cuts benefit only the wealthy - for two reasons.
1. The true wealthy pay only a tiny percent of the total money government takes in in taxes. The largest percent is paid by the middle class - that's where the money is. If government confiscated every cent from every rich person the government could operate only about 24 hours.
2. The people who tell us that tax cuts benefit only the rich are themselves wealthy and know better. By this reasoning, since only the rich benefit, no one gets a tax break.
The big trick is to reserve to government the right to define who is "rich." Anyone "out there" making over the poverty level of around $24,000 for a family of four, is defined by the tax grabbers as rich.
To: HHKrepublican_2
We must remember that "cuts" in programs mean that the average taxpayer will have more money in his own pocket.
Now let's see Congress cut foreign aid (out), pork, perks,corporate welfare subsidies, farm subsidies, and do away with the IRS and institute a fair tax plan.
BTW it's a myth that tax cuts benefit only the wealthy - for two reasons.
1. The true wealthy pay only a tiny percent of the total money government takes in in taxes. The largest percent is paid by the middle class - that's where the money is. If government confiscated every cent from every rich person the government could operate only about 24 hours.
2. The people who tell us that tax cuts benefit only the rich are themselves wealthy and know better. By this reasoning, since only the rich benefit, no one gets a tax break.
The big trick is to reserve to government the right to define who is "rich." Anyone "out there" making over the poverty level of around $24,000 for a family of four, is defined by the tax grabbers as rich.
To: HHKrepublican_2
We must remember that "cuts" in programs mean that the average taxpayer will have more money in his own pocket.
Now let's see Congress cut foreign aid (out), pork, perks,corporate welfare subsidies, farm subsidies, and do away with the IRS and institute a fair tax plan.
BTW it's a myth that tax cuts benefit only the wealthy - for two reasons.
1. The true wealthy pay only a tiny percent of the total money government takes in in taxes. The largest percent is paid by the middle class - that's where the money is. If government confiscated every cent from every rich person the government could operate only about 24 hours.
2. The people who tell us that tax cuts benefit only the rich are themselves wealthy and know better. By this reasoning, since only the rich benefit, no one gets a tax break.
The big trick is to reserve to government the right to define who is "rich." Anyone "out there" making over the poverty level of around $24,000 for a family of four, is defined by the tax grabbers as rich.
To: HHKrepublican_2
We must remember that "cuts" in programs mean that the average taxpayer will have more money in his own pocket.
Now let's see Congress cut foreign aid (out), pork, perks,corporate welfare subsidies, farm subsidies, and do away with the IRS and institute a fair tax plan.
BTW it's a myth that tax cuts benefit only the wealthy - for two reasons.
1. The true wealthy pay only a tiny percent of the total money government takes in in taxes. The largest percent is paid by the middle class - that's where the money is. If government confiscated every cent from every rich person the government could operate only about 24 hours.
2. The people who tell us that tax cuts benefit only the rich are themselves wealthy and know better. By this reasoning, since only the rich benefit, no one gets a tax break.
The big trick is to reserve to government the right to define who is "rich." Anyone "out there" making over the poverty level of around $24,000 for a family of four, is defined by the tax grabbers as rich.
To: HHKrepublican_2
We must remember that "cuts" in programs mean that the average taxpayer will have more money in his own pocket.
Now let's see Congress cut foreign aid (out), pork, perks,corporate welfare subsidies, farm subsidies, and do away with the IRS and institute a fair tax plan.
BTW it's a myth that tax cuts benefit only the wealthy - for two reasons.
1. The true wealthy pay only a tiny percent of the total money government takes in in taxes. The largest percent is paid by the middle class - that's where the money is. If government confiscated every cent from every rich person the government could operate only about 24 hours.
2. The people who tell us that tax cuts benefit only the rich are themselves wealthy and know better. By this reasoning, since only the rich benefit, no one gets a tax break.
The big trick is to reserve to government the right to define who is "rich." Anyone "out there" making over the poverty level of around $24,000 for a family of four, is defined by the tax grabbers as rich.
To: HHKrepublican_2
We must remember that "cuts" in programs mean that the average taxpayer will have more money in his own pocket.
Now let's see Congress cut foreign aid (out), pork, perks,corporate welfare subsidies, farm subsidies, and do away with the IRS and institute a fair tax plan.
BTW it's a myth that tax cuts benefit only the wealthy - for two reasons.
1. The true wealthy pay only a tiny percent of the total money government takes in in taxes. The largest percent is paid by the middle class - that's where the money is. If government confiscated every cent from every rich person the government could operate only about 24 hours.
2. The people who tell us that tax cuts benefit only the rich are themselves wealthy and know better. By this reasoning, since only the rich benefit, no one gets a tax break.
The big trick is to reserve to government the right to define who is "rich." Anyone "out there" making over the poverty level of around $24,000 for a family of four, is defined by the tax grabbers as rich.
To: HHKrepublican_2
The spending battle now heads to the House, where Republicans are divided over whether to cut more deeply across a broader range of social programs. Cut PBS funding first. There's no reason why the majority of tax payers (Republicans) should pay for a far left wing infomercial!
Then move on to the Endowment for the Arts (It's an unnecessary liberal "artist" welfare program. If they truly were artistic, they'd be able to sell their product and support themselves!).
To: Arthur Wildfire! March
Ah the Alaska pork is only half a billion, or roughly what the Alaskans get yearly in un-tax rebates from the Alaskan state government.
236
posted on
11/06/2005 8:30:12 PM PST
by
AmericanDave
(God bless .......and MORE COWBELL)
To: soccer_maniac
so why are we giving well off seniors free drugs yet cutting Medicaid services for the dissabled.....and I do mean the truely dissabled?
oh I forgot.....the senior lobby gets the votes out so they get the gold.......
I'm all for cuts, but I think it should start with the massive obscene military/civilian pension system as well as the massive/obscene Social Security system, both which are robbing from the young and the poor to keep the old gezzers fat and happy.....
237
posted on
11/07/2005 10:14:52 AM PST
by
cherry
To: peyton randolph
I got an idea on saving $223M of pork - that stupid bridge to nowhere in Alaska that nobody wants. Except by the Alaskan senators, that is.
238
posted on
11/07/2005 10:29:45 AM PST
by
tob2
(Old Fossil and Proud of It!)
To: Gipper08
Pence needs to get the RSC members motivated and energized to impart true, genuine cuts, not this political legerdemain, to this bill when it comes to the House.
239
posted on
11/07/2005 5:34:46 PM PST
by
jla
To: HHKrepublican_2
Reaction 1: What country is this article about.
Reaction 2: OK. It's the US. Is it true, or is it a reduction in rate of increase?
Reaction 3: The latter. Sigh.
240
posted on
11/07/2005 5:39:29 PM PST
by
gitmo
(From now on, ending a sentence with a preposition is something up with which I will not put.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180, 181-200, 201-220, 221-240 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson