Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Libby indicted on obstruction of justice, false statement and perjury charge - RESIGNS
http://drudgereport.com/ ^ | October 28, 2005

Posted on 10/28/2005 9:45:41 AM PDT by West Coast Conservative

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 501-520521-540541-560 ... 741-751 next last
To: prognostigaator
It looks like Fitzy anticipated this attack on his investigation, and took pains at his press conference to address it, claiming that they gather the facts then determine whether a crime has been committed. According to what I have read, prosecutors have an ethical obligation to determine whether there has been a potential crime before they pursue it.

He's falling back on a claim that Plame's status as a CIA employee was "classified". I pray that he goes to court with that theory. That will open up Libby's attorney to attack the Wilsons and the CIA on all the examples where they themselves made her status as a CIA employee known. It allows the defense to make known liars the issue.

I also wonder whether this lamebrain prosecutor is concerned about all the leaks of classified information that go on every day in every article printed by the WaPo and the NYT or only this particular piece of allegedly classified info. If only this one, you have to wonder why.

I know why. This is a federal Ronnie Earle prosecutor, and he laid low until he could inflict the most damage possible. Now, he's been outed as a dem operative.

Andrew McCarthy, you should be ashamed of yourself for sticking up for this guy.

521 posted on 10/28/2005 11:53:25 AM PDT by Defiant (Dar al Salaam will exist when the entire world submits to American leadership.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 446 | View Replies]

To: daybreakcoming
Don't know if it's true but someone posted that Plame took off for France and has not returned.

Does she think she'll get asylum from Chirac?

522 posted on 10/28/2005 11:53:49 AM PDT by OldFriend (G-D IS NOT THE AUTHOR OF CONFUSION)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 515 | View Replies]

To: my_pointy_head_is_sharp
Why does Novak get a pass?

Did he reveal his sources to anyone? Is he ever going to?

523 posted on 10/28/2005 11:54:16 AM PDT by js1138 (Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 505 | View Replies]

To: conservativepoet

Fritz has just admitted he does not know if Libby intentionally knew he was outing Plame!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


524 posted on 10/28/2005 11:54:27 AM PDT by conservativepoet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 518 | View Replies]

To: Celtic Rose
True, and if he committed perjury or obstructed justice, he should face the consequences. However, as of right now, he has not been convicted. He deserves the presumption of innocence, as does everyone else, until he is proven guilty. We are not under Neopolionic Law here, despite what the DUmmies may wish. The burden of proof is with the state.

I agree with that.

525 posted on 10/28/2005 11:54:44 AM PDT by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Righteousness exalts a nation, but sin is a disgrace to any people. Ps. 14:34)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 520 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

Fitz said that Plame was classified. HOWEVER..that does not mean she is covered by the law that Fitz went after everybody with. THAT'S why there is no idictment for that.


526 posted on 10/28/2005 11:54:46 AM PDT by ArmyBratproud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlipWilson

I hope there's a transcript!


527 posted on 10/28/2005 11:55:12 AM PDT by mosquitobite (What we permit; we promote. ~ Mark Sanford for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 514 | View Replies]

To: isthisnickcool

You may NOT have an attorney with you in the grand jury room. You may go outside and ask your attorney for advice on every single question if you wish, but the attorney may not be in the grand jury room.


528 posted on 10/28/2005 11:55:21 AM PDT by OldFriend (G-D IS NOT THE AUTHOR OF CONFUSION)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 517 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend

Per Rush Limbaugh, "Fitz is fishing for a rat. He really wants Rove."


529 posted on 10/28/2005 11:57:10 AM PDT by sheikdetailfeather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 528 | View Replies]

To: The Ghost of FReepers Past
Ultimately he lost his law license, didn't he?

For a little while.

530 posted on 10/28/2005 11:58:31 AM PDT by processing please hold (Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: noblejones

Hurricane Rita hit us, but we don't mean anything. If it ain't Katrina...it ain't news.


531 posted on 10/28/2005 12:00:18 PM PDT by processing please hold (Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: BikerNYC
In the context of a federal investigation and materially false statements are made to federal agents conducting the investigation, your statements don't even have to be under oath. Ask Martha.

And with no crime underneath? It's a crock, a "gotcha" investigation and indictment.

Fitzgerald was looking for a smoking gun and came up with a fly swatter.

532 posted on 10/28/2005 12:01:46 PM PDT by sinkspur (Trust, but vilify.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 509 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.
according to the indictment Libby first learned about Plame from the STATE DEPT

POWELL?????

533 posted on 10/28/2005 12:02:28 PM PDT by processing please hold (Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
"Fitz-hack is in very deep water with his phoney allegations of covers being blown."

He's an idiot because he can't even conduct himself without the appearance of an impending nervous breakdown. I'd give him a pass if it's just nervousness (stage fright sort of thing) but I believe he's not being completely truthful. I'd like to see him pass a polygraph.
534 posted on 10/28/2005 12:03:32 PM PDT by jdm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 511 | View Replies]

To: sheikdetailfeather

Is Rove the unnamed "Official A" in the indictment?

I think so.


535 posted on 10/28/2005 12:05:58 PM PDT by LibWrangler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 529 | View Replies]

To: FlipWilson

Put Plame on the stand to testify her status. Who authorized her husband's mission to Niger? Why hadn't a non disclosure document been signed by her husband since he was on an intelligence mission?


536 posted on 10/28/2005 12:06:00 PM PDT by rip033 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 493 | View Replies]

To: Pirate21

Once the memory locations of interest have their cells switched to 1 or 0 in a different pattern the earlier information is all gone.


537 posted on 10/28/2005 12:06:09 PM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 415 | View Replies]

To: Bigh4u2
But Fitzgerald is speaking live and told the MSM that her 'cover was blown'. If she was not 'covert' then what 'cover' could have been blown? BTW. I don't believe she was covert, but apparently Fitz does.

There is a distinction between "classified" and "covert" - Fritz keeps using the phrase "classified status"...NOT "covert".

There is a difference.

538 posted on 10/28/2005 12:08:00 PM PDT by SevenMinusOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 504 | View Replies]

To: jdm

I have to admit that I'm surprised at how little he knows about the original intent of his investigation. If I were a Dim, I wouldn't be very confident about this investigation or prosecutor.

Reporter for FoxNews indicated Fritz went to Rove's lawyer with the idea of indicting Rove today, but Rove's lawyer put it to Fritz with hard questions and Fritz backed down. It looks like Fritz can't prove intent even with Libby. If Libby hadn't mislead jury, Fritz would still have no case.


539 posted on 10/28/2005 12:09:46 PM PDT by conservativepoet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 534 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
You can't lie to federal investigators. Period.

They may be investigating a crime and come to the conclusion that the evidence does not support charges. But if you lie to them in their investation, you lose. I personally think you should have to be under oath, but that's not the way it is.
540 posted on 10/28/2005 12:10:54 PM PDT by BikerNYC (Modernman should not have been banned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 532 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 501-520521-540541-560 ... 741-751 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson