Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Misunderestimating The Furor Over Hurricane Harriet
GOPUSA ^ | October 10, 2005 | Chuck Muth

Posted on 10/10/2005 8:55:12 AM PDT by Warhammer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 221-222 next last
To: flashbunny
Here's two more classic howlers from that crowd we've frequently witnessed for your list:

6. You're a longtime "sleeper" DU troll.

7. You're "stalking" me.

Think of the kittens!

101 posted on 10/10/2005 10:21:38 AM PDT by A Jovial Cad ("It has been my experience that folks who have no vices have very few virtues." -Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: flashbunny

If it had been false, I would.


102 posted on 10/10/2005 10:21:54 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
FR is the largest conservative forum on the web, and therefore has the most accurate cross-section of conservative thought. If not FR, which other web forums do you believe represent conservative opinion better?

None of them do. Most conservatives don't post on the internet. They go to work, raise kids, go to PTA, and use the web to order books from Amazon.com.

That's why, it seems to me, most conservatives will support Bush's pick of Harriett Miers. They don't get into Supreme Court arcana, and they would never dream of making a judgement on a person before that person has had a chance to make her case.

103 posted on 10/10/2005 10:22:28 AM PDT by sinkspur (If you're not willing to give Harriett Miers a hearing, I don't give a damn what you think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: mosquitobite
The doctrine of papal infallibility only covers pronouncements made ex cathedra on matters of faith or morals, not Supreme Court nominations...so even if President Bush had asked Pope Benedict XVI for advice and had followed his recommendation, the choice would not have infallibly correct.
104 posted on 10/10/2005 10:22:42 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson
Were 40% in the undecided category for Roberts?

The 26% "NO" should be a red flag. It is to anybody in the party who is honestly reviewing the scene.

105 posted on 10/10/2005 10:23:02 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Ridiculous; go to ANY conservative gathering and 80 percent of the people have never even heard of FR.

Fair point, but that does not mean that we do not have a good sampling of conservative thought here. Can you think of any web forum that has a better cross-section of modern American conservative thought?

106 posted on 10/10/2005 10:23:16 AM PDT by jmc813 (Bork Miers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

"go to ANY conservative gathering and 80 percent of the people have never even heard of FR."

Your comment reminds me of the media elite dumbfounding after the Reagan landslide. "But, I've never met anybody who voted for Reagan.

You should reassess your circles.


107 posted on 10/10/2005 10:25:43 AM PDT by rbmillerjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
There's surely a good sampling, but it's not represenatative, as the far right wing is much more prominent here than in the actual party.

Can you think of any web forum that has a better cross-section of modern American conservative thought?

Absolutely not; that's why "sleepers" come here to distrupt all the time!

108 posted on 10/10/2005 10:26:42 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Warhammer

Rainy days and Mondays, and conservative kindred souls
slanging back and forth, well, they always get me down.

Nothing to see here, let's move along.


109 posted on 10/10/2005 10:26:48 AM PDT by tumblindice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr

I don't need to reassess them; I know people from the White House to the local level; they are NOT anywhere near as "mouth frothing" as we are.


110 posted on 10/10/2005 10:28:07 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur; Betaille

You might want to look up Clifton 9th circuit before you continue to spread simply what the MSM wants you to believe.


111 posted on 10/10/2005 10:30:35 AM PDT by mosquitobite (What we permit; we promote. ~ Mark Sanford for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Itzlzha

> The official "Cult of Bush" mascot...the Howler Monkey! <

LMAO!!


112 posted on 10/10/2005 10:31:38 AM PDT by jaime1959
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Who in the White House?


113 posted on 10/10/2005 10:31:42 AM PDT by dakine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
"The real GOP wins elections, something most of you pitchforkers can't say."

Not always. In fact, in '92 it lost, BIG TIME after just four years of GW's father. It appears GW is returning to form. 2006 and 2008 could get real ugly real fast.

114 posted on 10/10/2005 10:32:03 AM PDT by AlguyA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
oh my goodness. Now the best argument to support Miers is that FR is not representative of the collective conservative will. I will leave it to the social scientists to check out those statistics. I could not care less about collective statistics. My opposition is based on my thorough review of her notoriously empty record and not the statements of any other representative or non-representative individual.

Trashing inside the fence opposition or trying to move the fence is not going to help this argument one little bit.

115 posted on 10/10/2005 10:32:33 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: mosquitobite
You might want to look up Clifton 9th circuit

You do it for me. I have no idea who "Clifton" is.

116 posted on 10/10/2005 10:33:42 AM PDT by sinkspur (If you're not willing to give Harriett Miers a hearing, I don't give a damn what you think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

The problem is everyone wanting to count the 40% in the yes category to show that those who have questions should be marginalized.


117 posted on 10/10/2005 10:34:34 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: AlguyA

Because the unappeasables sat home or voted for Ross Perot.


118 posted on 10/10/2005 10:34:45 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: jmc813

LMAO: http://www.whitehouse.gov/


119 posted on 10/10/2005 10:36:18 AM PDT by mosquitobite (What we permit; we promote. ~ Mark Sanford for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: dakine

As if I'm going to name names. Not Bush though.


120 posted on 10/10/2005 10:36:24 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 221-222 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson