Report adds fuel to gun registry debate

EDMONTON SUN ^ | October 7, 2005 | DOUG BEAZLEY

[RedMonqey]

Potential murders will start to play "Hockey"

[pillbox_girl]

> > "It's the reason why we need to establish better international protocols on gun trafficking," she said.

> What does that mean? Isn't already illegal to take guns across the border? What they need to do is enforce their existing laws.

I'll tell you what it means. Here's a direct translation from Canadian into American:

It's the reason we need to support the U.N.'s gun grabbing effort to take guns away from those horrid freedom loving individualistic self reliant Americans.

[Brilliant]

Since we have a constitutional amendment that guarantees the right to bear arms, a treaty saying we can't would be worthless. Maybe these Canadians need a lesson in how our government works. They don't seem to be very up on it.

[billnaz]

And after this news the gun-grabbing hoplophobes still insist that gun registration works.

[goldstategop]

Does the Left admit gun consfiscation is a failure? Not in Canada - the waste of a $1 billion is reason enough to try it longer.

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)