Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Anna Nicole Smith Case
tbo.com ^

Posted on 09/27/2005 6:42:37 AM PDT by Sub-Driver

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last
To: Always Right; sandbar

Funny, but this estate has probably dwindled considerably due to cumulative attorney's fees. The bill rate clock has been ticking since 1995.


21 posted on 09/27/2005 7:11:23 AM PDT by demkicker (Life has many choices. Eternity has only two. Which one have you chosen?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: WhyisaTexasgirlinPA

She performed her services. She chose a great client. She deserves the cash.


22 posted on 09/27/2005 7:11:32 AM PDT by Fierce Allegiance (Anyone want to be on my Civil Engineers ping list? Infrequent pings only to relevant stuff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver; TheBigB; Tijeras_Slim; mikrofon; Charles Henrickson; pissant

"We only hear appealing cases here, Ms. Smith."

23 posted on 09/27/2005 7:19:37 AM PDT by martin_fierro (Randle-El is a freakin' IDIOT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fierce Allegiance

Hey, there's a limit on what I can and can't Google search at work. ;o)


24 posted on 09/27/2005 7:19:54 AM PDT by TheBigB (I will punch the next person who confuses "you're" and "your". Seriously. Don't test me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

ROFL!


25 posted on 09/27/2005 7:21:06 AM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

With all of the really worthy cases the Supreme Court refuses to hear it is especially sad that they are willing to hear the case of one cheap tart who married an extremely old man for his money.

Then again the US judiciary takes great pains to hear cases that benefit only women on a daily basis whether it is "fair" or not. Just step into any woman friendly family court on any day anywhere in America and you will find proof of this.


26 posted on 09/27/2005 7:23:13 AM PDT by An American In Dairyland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fierce Allegiance

I agree - it would have taken 400 million for me to sleep with Mr. Marshall too - I was just saying it was funny that she referred to his son as scheming.


27 posted on 09/27/2005 7:24:14 AM PDT by WhyisaTexasgirlinPA (Prayers for healing and relief from pain for Cowboy...........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro
She's appealing to me. ;o)

(about ten years ago....)

28 posted on 09/27/2005 7:24:48 AM PDT by TheBigB (I will punch the next person who confuses "you're" and "your". Seriously. Don't test me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: TheBigB

Me too. That, btw, was a general statemnet not ecessarily directe at you.


29 posted on 09/27/2005 7:24:53 AM PDT by Fierce Allegiance (Anyone want to be on my Civil Engineers ping list? Infrequent pings only to relevant stuff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: WhyisaTexasgirlinPA
it would have taken 400 million for me to sleep with Mr. Marshall too

Reminds me of an old joke:A guy walks into a bar and sees this very beautiful woman. He asked her if she would sleep with him for ten million dollars. She said yes. He then asked if she would do it for $50. She said "What do I look like, a prostitute?" to which he responded "We've already established that you will sleep with me for money, we're just negotiating price now."

30 posted on 09/27/2005 7:28:09 AM PDT by Fierce Allegiance (Anyone want to be on my Civil Engineers ping list? Infrequent pings only to relevant stuff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

"Ms. Smith, according to the court's breast - er, best - judgment, your case has interesting constitutional implications."


31 posted on 09/27/2005 7:28:16 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fierce Allegiance

Proofread.


32 posted on 09/27/2005 7:28:35 AM PDT by Fierce Allegiance (Anyone want to be on my Civil Engineers ping list? Infrequent pings only to relevant stuff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Fierce Allegiance
I could make a "suck emergency" joke here.

But I won't. ;o)

33 posted on 09/27/2005 7:29:04 AM PDT by TheBigB (I will punch the next person who confuses "you're" and "your". Seriously. Don't test me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle
Justice Roberts (aside to Justice Scalia): "Check out the size of those implications!"
34 posted on 09/27/2005 7:30:25 AM PDT by TheBigB (I will punch the next person who confuses "you're" and "your". Seriously. Don't test me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

35 posted on 09/27/2005 7:38:29 AM PDT by KosmicKitty (Well... There you go again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheBigB
"Justice Roberts (aside to Justice Scalia): "Check out the size of those implications!"

Enormous implications.
36 posted on 09/27/2005 7:40:53 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

She deserves every penny that loony she married had. His sons can find their own rich widows to fleece.


37 posted on 09/27/2005 8:02:49 AM PDT by hgro (ews)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

38 posted on 09/27/2005 8:10:43 AM PDT by UnklGene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anonymous_user

Got gloves?


39 posted on 09/27/2005 8:43:10 AM PDT by GladesGuru ("In a society predicated upon liberty, it is essential to examine principles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

We're looking forward to the oral . . . . arguments.


40 posted on 09/27/2005 8:45:23 AM PDT by ChadGore (VISUALIZE 62,041,268 Bush fans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson