Global warming: Something New Under the Sun?

World Climate Control ^ | May 10, 2005

[Old Professer]

Your link doesn't work and this article makes no sense whatsoever.

What gives?

[Old Professer]

If it ain't our fault, how are we supposed to fix it?

[Old Professer]

Smokers already knew this; they buy a new bottle of Windex once a year.

[Old Professer]

I went to the link; there is no credit for authorship so this must be an editorial position paper.

[WOSG]

Global Warming bump.
Yet another piece of evidence that throws current climate models in doubt. Many of the GW skeptics have been advocating that solar forcings were the direct reason for most temperature change. This will strengthen their case.

[Puppage]

If it ain't our fault, how are we supposed to fix it?

Who says it's broke?

[Rippin]

Uncbob, the term "Global warming" does not refer to an increase in temperatures over a period of time (however they may be measured.)

It refers to a specific hypothesis, namely that human activity is causing the climate of the earth to change for the worse.

The conservative position is that this hypothesis is unsubstantiated and that the leftist attempt to use it to undermine the free world should be opposed.

[Grampa Dave]

Duh!

Does this mean that we have had global warming since the last ice age and it's the Sun's fault not GW's?

[Steve Van Doorn]

Enron was one of the orginizations pushing the global warming agenda.

[UnklGene]

[UnklGene]