Posted on 09/19/2005 12:00:19 PM PDT by Parmenio
The hysterical bleating and grandstanding that lies ahead from people like Chuckie Schumer is just tap dancing for the benefit of his liberal political donors.
The big war comes with the next nomination, unless Bush taps somebody like Bill Clinton or Mario Cuomo for the seat.
If Specter were to support a filibuster of the next nominee, he will be stripped of his chairmanship in prompt order. Pay attention to not what he says but what he does.
1.They didn't get all the documents..
2. He wasn't forthcoming in his answers
3. They want to know the next nominee before they vote..
It will not be a party-line vote..I expect 35 or so Dems to vote against. Their hope will be that the country will buy the garabage in points 1-3 above..enough to cut them slack for voting NO..and then try to build upon that to justify filabuistering the next nominee..
BTW..Re Hillary, the titular head of the party, and presumptive nominee..well..if you searched her public comments the last two months..you woudn't even know their is a nomination..
He said it on the Senate floor. I heard it too...
Specter has too high of an opinion of himself.
Specter supported Scalia and Thomas.
Publicity is what he craves.
And then you'll do what?
I really hope lightning does not strike me for saying this, but when Specter was totally bald, he looked exactly like Dr. Evil in the Austin Powers movies.
It isn't about this nomination, it is all about the next one. The one that will in fact tip the balance.
This has been a walk in the park compared to the next nomination.
And has been trying hard to make up for it ever since.
I made a mistake - this was actually a post to NRO's "Bench Memos" blog, not The Corner.
Absolutely true, but the RATS and their media handmaidens will have a more difficult time assaulting a qualified woman appointed to the USSC.
People get a damn grip Roberts is going to be fine....he is no Souter.
Send Ann Coulter some flowers.
We won't....we know ....you are a hand wringer who is listening to the media to much..
How nice to hear from one of the GOP Big Tent RINOs/liberals/moderates.
Who you calling a RINO?
Does anyone on this board really believe that Bush would appoint a true strict constructionist?
Even Scalia could not be called a strict constuctionist.
Who you calling a hand wringer?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.