Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Specter
NRO "The Corner" ^ | September 19, 2005 | Kathryn Jean Lopez

Posted on 09/19/2005 12:00:19 PM PDT by Parmenio

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: FlipWilson
The Dems are not going to bother. Roberts is in.

The hysterical bleating and grandstanding that lies ahead from people like Chuckie Schumer is just tap dancing for the benefit of his liberal political donors.

The big war comes with the next nomination, unless Bush taps somebody like Bill Clinton or Mario Cuomo for the seat.

21 posted on 09/19/2005 12:12:23 PM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: epluribus_2

If Specter were to support a filibuster of the next nominee, he will be stripped of his chairmanship in prompt order. Pay attention to not what he says but what he does.


22 posted on 09/19/2005 12:12:57 PM PDT by mwl1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: mwl1
The Dems will NOT filabuster Roberts. Howqever, during the debate they will oppsoe him on the following grounds:

1.They didn't get all the documents..

2. He wasn't forthcoming in his answers

3. They want to know the next nominee before they vote..

It will not be a party-line vote..I expect 35 or so Dems to vote against. Their hope will be that the country will buy the garabage in points 1-3 above..enough to cut them slack for voting NO..and then try to build upon that to justify filabuistering the next nominee..

BTW..Re Hillary, the titular head of the party, and presumptive nominee..well..if you searched her public comments the last two months..you woudn't even know their is a nomination..

23 posted on 09/19/2005 12:17:26 PM PDT by ken5050 (Ann Coulter needs to have children ASAP to pass on her gene pool....any volunteers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Parmenio
No source cited.

He said it on the Senate floor. I heard it too...

24 posted on 09/19/2005 12:18:37 PM PDT by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Parmenio

Specter has too high of an opinion of himself.


25 posted on 09/19/2005 12:19:14 PM PDT by NavySEAL F-16 (Proud to be a Reagan Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Czar

Specter supported Scalia and Thomas.


26 posted on 09/19/2005 12:19:55 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: NavySEAL F-16

Publicity is what he craves.


27 posted on 09/19/2005 12:20:30 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Czar
" Specter Support = Roberts is neither a conservative nor an originalist.

However, I'll withhold judgment for now. Lets wait until we have some history, say in a year or two. By then, we will know one way or the other ...
"


And then you'll do what?



28 posted on 09/19/2005 12:20:34 PM PDT by G.Mason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: bobbdobbs

I really hope lightning does not strike me for saying this, but when Specter was totally bald, he looked exactly like Dr. Evil in the Austin Powers movies.


29 posted on 09/19/2005 12:22:26 PM PDT by IN Farm Girl (Hoosier by birth, Boilermaker by the grace of God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

It isn't about this nomination, it is all about the next one. The one that will in fact tip the balance.
This has been a walk in the park compared to the next nomination.


30 posted on 09/19/2005 12:22:31 PM PDT by Joe Boucher (an enemy of islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat
"Specter supported Scalia and Thomas.

And has been trying hard to make up for it ever since.

31 posted on 09/19/2005 12:22:45 PM PDT by Czar (StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Parmenio

I made a mistake - this was actually a post to NRO's "Bench Memos" blog, not The Corner.


32 posted on 09/19/2005 12:23:55 PM PDT by Parmenio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher
This has been a walk in the park compared to the next nomination.

Absolutely true, but the RATS and their media handmaidens will have a more difficult time assaulting a qualified woman appointed to the USSC.

33 posted on 09/19/2005 12:25:16 PM PDT by mwl1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy
It is not.

People get a damn grip Roberts is going to be fine....he is no Souter.

34 posted on 09/19/2005 12:29:32 PM PDT by Dog ( We haven't forgotten you Commander Michael Speicher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: G.Mason
"And then you'll do what?

Send Ann Coulter some flowers.

35 posted on 09/19/2005 12:31:34 PM PDT by Czar (StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Czar
Don't ask me if I'm optimistic...

We won't....we know ....you are a hand wringer who is listening to the media to much..

36 posted on 09/19/2005 12:31:42 PM PDT by Dog ( We haven't forgotten you Commander Michael Speicher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Dog
"you are a hand wringer who is listening to the media to much.."

How nice to hear from one of the GOP Big Tent RINOs/liberals/moderates.

37 posted on 09/19/2005 12:36:59 PM PDT by Czar (StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Czar

Who you calling a RINO?


38 posted on 09/19/2005 12:38:19 PM PDT by Dog (Fed up with weak in the knee Freepers.....who whine the sky is falling when it's NOT!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Czar

Does anyone on this board really believe that Bush would appoint a true strict constructionist?

Even Scalia could not be called a strict constuctionist.


39 posted on 09/19/2005 12:40:17 PM PDT by JusticeForAll76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Dog

Who you calling a hand wringer?


40 posted on 09/19/2005 12:40:25 PM PDT by Czar (StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson