Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California Legislature Passes Homosexual Marriage Bill -- Move Ensures GOP Gains in 2006
Human Events ^ | Sep 7, 2005 | Assemblyman Chuck DeVore

Posted on 09/07/2005 2:54:29 PM PDT by rhema

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last
To: LexBaird

Gay marriage wasn't on the table in California in 2004, but it was in other states to the benefit of Republicans.


41 posted on 09/07/2005 6:47:54 PM PDT by Smogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: fizziwig

IF this bill pass we haven't seen anything yet and that is for sure,BIBLE says so.


42 posted on 09/07/2005 10:31:26 PM PDT by primrose (PRIMROSE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: nightowl
Thank you, nightowl, for pinging me to this. I truly had no doubts whatsoever that he would veto this bill. Particularly in light of passage by majority vote of Prop 22.

What I've been looking to see is what exactly CA Dems are hiding behind their backs. This strategy of theirs is way too obvious -- putting a bill on the table to "legislate" gay marriage. This, IME, is a staging event for something else.

I like Arnold, and I do think he's doing a good job, despite factions of GOP dissent, despite the fact that the CA Dems are very corrupt, but hidden only by the fact that "Katrina-Like" organizations have long since been in place, erected by previous Republicans in CA. If the spotlight were ever turned on what the CA Dems have been doing for overlong in CA, why... the NOLA officials might appear as mere amateurs in the ballgame of "incompetence". CA is so big, it can hide corruption easier than a smaller place like New Orleans.

Big picture-wise, he has done an amazing job of halting the Dems from sinking CA vis a vis a HillaryCare (1/6th economy) type focus.

CA Dems are determined to sink CA, and particularly during President Bush's presidency. That's the big picture.

43 posted on 09/08/2005 4:37:38 AM PDT by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Smogger
Gay marriage wasn't on the table in California in 2004, but it was in other states to the benefit of Republicans.

It may help in statewide elections, such as Governor and Lt. Gov., but it won't make a spit's worth of difference in who wins on a district by district basis. The districts are carved out exquisitely along party lines to benefit incumbents with overwhelming local majorities.

The state legislature is unafraid of defying public will of 70% of the population because they know they have job security. Jackie Goldberg could introduce a bill to to make wearing buttless leather chaps mandatory, and get reelected with an overwhelming majority.

44 posted on 09/08/2005 7:04:41 AM PDT by LexBaird (tyrannosaurus Lex, unapologetic, yet compassionate carnivore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: LexBaird

That's why I will be voting for Prop 77. Nevermind the whiners that say that it doesn't go far enough blah blah. Anything the Democrats in the legislature oppose I am in favor of.


45 posted on 09/08/2005 7:10:03 AM PDT by Smogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson