Posted on 08/23/2005 10:51:56 AM PDT by Peach
Yeah, that was MacDill. And this other thing mentions Andrews. There've got to be more people who know about this.
And there isn't.
Congressional investigation, my derriere. Why the heck didn't Congress insist on a written official record?!
So if 9/11 happened a few months earlier, then Clinton would be all set. How convenient.
I'm book marking your link. This will come in handy.
I have to make dinner, but I'm going to try to connect dots afterwords.
THANKS!
Apparently the commission "arbitrarily" decided to limit their investigation to the years starting with 1998. Could the fact that Gorelick resigned from the Justice Dept in '97 have anything to do with that decision????
"A Pentagon investigation has found no evidence..."
favorite word of the Clintons "evidence"
as in "there is no evidence"
meaning, nothing that can be brought into a court of law
Ping for reading once I get home.
Stevens relied upon international standards (i.e. what the Euros think) to support his opinion that executing a 17 year old was 'cruel and unusual' punishment. He's an idiot, but that is still not "relying on UN laws".
Remember how afraid we were just before the 2000 elections, that *something* would happen in this country, clinton would declare martial law, and he would NEVER leave? hmmmm, it's making sense now. That POS was making preparations for something that they knew might set in motion a disaster caused by their wall. Mary Jo White warned as much. They had the chatter. They had names and photos. And they had an overview that each agency only had a piece of. They knew they were gambling with our security. MHO, of course.
One more thing. Each agency could only see a part of the whole. SOMEBODY had to been the recipient of all those separate parts. And could see the whole. Martial Law, indeed. They knew there was a VERY good possibility that it may have to be invoked.
Very possible
And don't forget the Bin Laden atttacked us long before 98
Those confirmations dates are valuable. Rumsfeld was in the building, but no other Bush appointees until Wolfowitz five weeks later, and no others until May. That is astounding! Thanks!
What needs to be asked: "Why on earth was he a staffer as he was so involved with the history?"
AFAIK Lott and Hastert.
That makes it a whole different ball game.
Wonder how she fit into this whole mess.
I was stunned when I saw that guy in the National Geographic special on 9-11 after what I had read about him on this forum.
Oh,yes, it most definitely DOES. Those POS were making preparations for what they KNEW could be coming. There HAD to be a reason for the Sec. of Defense for Domestic Issues to be set up. It all makes sense now.
Do you know if this was addressed by the 911 Commission???
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.