Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Owner bereft after state takes away her pet duck
Seattle Times ^ | 17 AUG 05 | By Maureen O’Hagan

Posted on 08/20/2005 10:30:03 AM PDT by greydog

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: Zacs Mom
Put down that duck and back away... slowly!

These wildlife Keystone Kops are an embarrassment.

41 posted on 08/20/2005 11:25:25 AM PDT by Publius6961 (Liberal level playing field: If the Islamics win we are their slaves..if we win they are our equals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: happinesswithoutpeace
" She found a Web site that sold custom-made duck diapers and had a pair fitted for Gooey.

"....speechless....""

I certainly would think so. The "Web site" comment seems appropriate, though
42 posted on 08/20/2005 11:25:48 AM PDT by momf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: CondorFlight

That was a young boy who had to watch them confiscate the bird he'd saved.


43 posted on 08/20/2005 11:27:51 AM PDT by momf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SandyInSeattle
She got the duck back, on the condition that she release it when its ready to fly.

Did the duck-Taliban get a few sessions of sensitivity training? Did they get fired?

How about if when the duck is "released" it decides to hang around? They gonna machine-gun it away?

44 posted on 08/20/2005 11:28:48 AM PDT by Publius6961 (Liberal level playing field: If the Islamics win we are their slaves..if we win they are our equals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: sourcery
Their seizure of the duck is therefore illegal, and they are therefore guilty of a Federal crime

I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for them to be prosecuted for it. The feds cover for their own.

45 posted on 08/20/2005 11:29:00 AM PDT by Prime Choice (E=mc^3. Don't drink and derive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: somemoreequalthanothers
One day the "authorities" are going to hassle the wrong person.

What do you think happened at Waco?

46 posted on 08/20/2005 11:30:10 AM PDT by Prime Choice (E=mc^3. Don't drink and derive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961
From the King County Journal:

Under the release agreement, Erdmann ``must release the duck within several months, once it is ready for flight,'' Koenings said. Also, Erdmann must allow a Fish and Wildlife biologist to check on Gooey's welfare, ``as needed,'' Koenings said.

Whether Gooey would actually fly away from Erdmann, or whether state biologists actually have the time to make house calls on ducks wasn't clear Friday night.

Clearly they haven't thought that far ahead.

47 posted on 08/20/2005 11:33:26 AM PDT by Not A Snowbird (Official RKBA Landscaper and Arborist, Duchess of Green Leafy Things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: greydog
A duck walks into a hardware store and says to the attendant "have you got any grapes?"

The attendant replies "NO this is a hard ware store we don't have any grapes"

The duck shrugs his shoulders and walks out.

The following day the duck walks back into the same hardware store "you got any grapes?"

The attendant looks at the duck and shouts "I told you yesterday that we dont have any grapes, now get out of my store!"

The next day the duck walks back into the hardware store and quacks "you got any grapes?"

The attendant looks at the duck in disbelief and screams "Look I have told you three times now that we dont have any grapes and if you come in here again asking for grapes then I am going to nail your flat webbed feet to the floor, you got it ?. Now get out of my store!!!"

Next day the duck walks back into the store "You got any nails?"

The attendant, surprised, says "No, we're all out of nails."

"Good", says the duck. "You got any grapes?"

48 posted on 08/20/2005 11:42:23 AM PDT by Hildy ("When you want something you've never had, you've got to do something you've never done.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: greydog

I'm glad to see that Wash State is ignoring all of those "trivial" problems such as murder, rape, drug use, voter fraud, pollution and Mount St Helen's so that they can focus on this much more "important" crisis.


49 posted on 08/20/2005 11:44:30 AM PDT by Casekirchen (If allah is just another name for the Judeo-Christian God, why do the islamics pray to a rock?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Queen

"WHERE IS PETA WHEN YOU NEED THEM????"


PETA would kill the duck. They would rather see an animal dead than have it be someone's pet.


50 posted on 08/20/2005 11:46:13 AM PDT by Andy'smom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Prime Choice

I still am amazed the media gives the clinton administration a free pass on that.


51 posted on 08/20/2005 11:51:57 AM PDT by somemoreequalthanothers (All for the betterment of "the state", comrade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee
"Meanwhile, Hansen gave very clear orders: No search warrant, no duck.
The officers didn’t see it that way.

The wildlife officers are like that in many states.

52 posted on 08/20/2005 12:00:23 PM PDT by Dust in the Wind (I've got peace like a river. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sourcery
BUT; Migratory birds (ducks) are regulated under international treaties that are administered by Federal law and it's agents. In this case being the state DOW officers. See why they get overzealous.
53 posted on 08/20/2005 12:12:25 PM PDT by Dust in the Wind (I've got peace like a river. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf
How's this:


54 posted on 08/20/2005 12:13:33 PM PDT by zeebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: greydog

Viaduct....vy not a chicken?


55 posted on 08/20/2005 12:18:51 PM PDT by Focault's Pendulum (I'm not a curmudgeon!!!! I've just been in a bad mood since '73)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: somemoreequalthanothers
I still am amazed the media gives the clinton administration a free pass on that.

I'm not. If Bush did a fraction of the atrocities against Americans as Clinton did, the Leftists would be crying for his head on a pike. ...but since ol' Billy Jeff had "the best of intentions," it's all A-OK in the eyes of the mainstream (sic) media and other anti-American bigots.

What really steamed me was when Clinton blamed the OKC bombing on Conservative radio hosts. Un-frickin'-real. Imagine if Bush had blamed 9/11 on anti-American liberals. The Leftists would have gone nuclear.

56 posted on 08/20/2005 12:33:43 PM PDT by Prime Choice (E=mc^3. Don't drink and derive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: zeebee

"How's this:"
Looks like Maj. Wolfgang Hochstetter is going to be in trouble with Warner Bros..


57 posted on 08/20/2005 12:34:34 PM PDT by Marine_Uncle (Honor must be earned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: zeebee

ROTFLOL! That's perfect! (Or should I say, Thaaaat's despicable! *spit flying everywhere*)


58 posted on 08/20/2005 12:34:38 PM PDT by Prime Choice (E=mc^3. Don't drink and derive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Dust in the Wind
Migratory birds (ducks) are regulated under international treaties that are administered by Federal law and it's agents. In this case being the state DOW officers.

Title 18 Section 242 does not exempt Federal officials. And the Fourth Ammendment cannot be repealed by a treaty. The point here is that the law necessary to remedy this situation already exists. What is lacking is the requisite political pressure to get the law enforced. Hmmmm...I wonder how that could be changed...

59 posted on 08/20/2005 12:39:58 PM PDT by sourcery ("Compelling State Interest" is the refuge of judicial activist traitors against the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: sourcery
"Title 18 Section 242 does not exempt Federal officials. And the Fourth Ammendment cannot be repealed by a treaty."

That is how I understand it also, but you know how they treat the law at the federal level, forgetting they are at the bottom and not the top of the trickle down hill.

60 posted on 08/20/2005 12:52:40 PM PDT by Dust in the Wind (I've got peace like a river. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson