Skip to comments.
The Homestead Project: Making a Mars Settlement a Reality
space.com ^
| 08/10/05
| Ker Than
Posted on 08/10/2005 7:38:32 PM PDT by KevinDavis
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
To: RightWhale; Brett66; xrp; gdc314; anymouse; RadioAstronomer; NonZeroSum; jimkress; discostu; ...
2
posted on
08/10/2005 7:39:02 PM PDT
by
KevinDavis
(the space/future belongs to the eagles --> http://www.cafepress.com/kevinspace1)
To: KevinDavis
It is possible. Won't be easy.
3
posted on
08/10/2005 7:40:27 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Withdraw from the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty and open the Land Office)
To: RightWhale; All
4
posted on
08/10/2005 7:42:52 PM PDT
by
KevinDavis
(the space/future belongs to the eagles --> http://www.cafepress.com/kevinspace1)
To: KevinDavis
But, more power to them. My own interest is mining the asteroids, and that does not include Mars.
5
posted on
08/10/2005 7:46:01 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Withdraw from the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty and open the Land Office)
To: KevinDavis
I want on the ping.
Also, on the plan: NEATO!
6
posted on
08/10/2005 7:46:55 PM PDT
by
Alexander Rubin
(Octavius - You make my heart glad building thus, as if Rome is to be eternal.)
To: KevinDavis
I want on the ping.
Also, on the plan: NEATO!
7
posted on
08/10/2005 7:46:55 PM PDT
by
Alexander Rubin
(Octavius - You make my heart glad building thus, as if Rome is to be eternal.)
To: RightWhale; All
Well my interest is beyond the solar system...
8
posted on
08/10/2005 7:47:09 PM PDT
by
KevinDavis
(the space/future belongs to the eagles --> http://www.cafepress.com/kevinspace1)
To: KevinDavis
It's cold out there. And dark. And sparse. Be sure to pack extra mittens. :)
9
posted on
08/10/2005 7:49:12 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Withdraw from the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty and open the Land Office)
To: All
To: RightWhale
But, more power to them. My own interest is mining the asteroids, and that does not include Mars. Mine too. I don't see much point in moving into a gravity well, unless there's guaranteed comfort, and lots of living space.
Mars doesn't have either, and won't have either for the predictable future. Asteroids can provide an abundance of raw materials, and there is no need to escape from a deep gravity well to move the materials to Earth. In fact, it would involve falling downward toward the sun, rather than boosting outward.
Robotic mining of the asteroids... next stop.
11
posted on
08/10/2005 7:50:53 PM PDT
by
coconutt2000
(NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
To: coconutt2000
Yep. We should be launching robotic mining equipment already, except for that pesky 1967 Treaty.
12
posted on
08/10/2005 7:52:44 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Withdraw from the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty and open the Land Office)
To: RightWhale; All
From what I understand it is a non issue.. Let me talk to a space law lawyer and ask him his opinion about the treaty....
13
posted on
08/10/2005 7:54:11 PM PDT
by
KevinDavis
(the space/future belongs to the eagles --> http://www.cafepress.com/kevinspace1)
To: KevinDavis
There are a couple who are up on the Treaty. It will take a big case, the kind that go to the USSC. If it goes to the UN it will be DOA.
14
posted on
08/10/2005 7:56:22 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Withdraw from the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty and open the Land Office)
To: RightWhale; All
Let me check it out again...
15
posted on
08/10/2005 7:57:30 PM PDT
by
KevinDavis
(the space/future belongs to the eagles --> http://www.cafepress.com/kevinspace1)
To: RightWhale
1. (1967) The Treaty on the Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies (commonly known as the Outer Space Treaty) seeks to keep outer space free for exploration by all States while protecting celestial bodies from national sovereignty. The Treaty permits private enterprises to use space for peaceful purposes if their activities and results are made public. The responsibility for all launches is borne by the State. 2. (1967) Agreement on the Rescue of Astronauts, the Return of Astronauts and the Return of Objects Launched into Outer Space (the Rescue Agreement) details assistance and retrieval procedures.
3. (1971) The Convention on International Liability for Damage Caused by Space Objects (the Liability Convention) attaches liability to the launching State.
4. (1974) The Convention on the Registration of Objects Launched into Outer Space (the Registration Convention) requires the UN to maintain a central register of specific information for each space object, available on inquiry.
5. (1979) The controversial Agreement Governing the Activities of States on the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies (the Moon Treaty) designates space as the "common heritage of mankind," not merely the "province of mankind" as written in the Outer Space Treaty.
-------------------------
It is no surprise why the conspiracy and UFO people think that the government wants to keep humans out of space. The way the treaty is set up, it acts as an anti-incentive program. Why try to exploit asteroids if the techniques and intellectual property you use to get there becomes public domain, and ownership of the asteroid is forbidden. Who'll own the minerals you mine? Etc...
16
posted on
08/10/2005 7:57:34 PM PDT
by
coconutt2000
(NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
To: KevinDavis
To: KevinDavis
If I were younger and this offered the chances of a real frontier instead of a socialist commune existence, I might consider packing up my trowel in my mason's bag and blasting off with them. I really hope they bring people that actually know how to do things instead of theoretically doing them...
18
posted on
08/10/2005 8:01:45 PM PDT
by
WorkingClassFilth
(Please stand by. We are experiencing technical difficulties.)
To: coconutt2000
The funny thing is that the President's Commission report on Moon, Mars and Beyond, which was done specifically for NASA's new space program says in Section 3 that the 1967 Treaty will be an impediment to private enterprise in outer space. "Will strangle the nascent industry in the cradle".
The President's campaign in 2000 also said they would look into private property rights in outer space. We're waiting.
19
posted on
08/10/2005 8:02:16 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Withdraw from the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty and open the Land Office)
To: KevinDavis
20
posted on
08/10/2005 8:02:48 PM PDT
by
flashbunny
(Always remember to bring a towel!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson