Skip to comments.
CAFTA outlaws many vitamins & supplements - stop CAFTA NOW!
Ask the Pharmacist Group ^
Posted on 07/23/2005 6:26:34 AM PDT by disclaimer
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-89 last
To: Loud Mime
To: 1rudeboy
82
posted on
07/23/2005 10:03:13 AM PDT
by
bjs1779
To: disclaimer
Thanks............. I'm working on the August one right now and will soon have automail updates.....
83
posted on
07/23/2005 10:05:40 AM PDT
by
Loud Mime
(thotline.com)
To: bjs1779
No I didn't. But the WTO didn't prevent it, either. That's the point I'm contesting.
84
posted on
07/23/2005 10:14:06 AM PDT
by
1rudeboy
To: 1rudeboy
No I didn't. But the WTO didn't prevent it, either. Remember, people remember what the FDA tried to do with supplements years ago. It took an act of Congress to reign them in. There is a precedent for the skepticism behavior, imo. Nowadays, we have Supreme Court Justices that refer to internatioal law when making decisions. Is it that much of a leap?
" In the past, FDA has repeatedly attempted to define dietary supplements as drugs or food additives and subsequently remove them from the market. The legislation defines a dietary supplement as any product which contains one or more dietary ingredients such as a vitamin, mineral, herb or other botanical, amino acid or other ingredient used to supplement the diet. The legislation makes it clear that these products may not be regulated as food additives or drugs under most circumstances."
Congress blocks FDA from removing health supplements
85
posted on
07/23/2005 10:42:08 AM PDT
by
bjs1779
To: ppaul
"Who cares about vitamins?"
I for one believe the ME'ers suffer from malnutrition, which has caused them to morph into rabid dogs. They need more bacon, eggs and ham...IMO
UWS
86
posted on
07/23/2005 10:47:49 AM PDT
by
underwiredsupport
(...for the shape of things to come!)
To: streetpreacher
Pointy-headed elitism? Zheesh.
I'm simply acknowledging that we are nowhere near getting to the point of everyone being educated enough to evaluate health and treatment options, thanks to government schools and negiligent parents. There's nothing elitist about that. It's simply recognizing an unfortunate reality.
I'd appreciate it if you could eliminate the baseless personal attacks.
To: bizzyblog
"If CAFTA effectively puts supplements back under FDA, I would have to reluctantly say that's a good thing."
I don't think the government should EVER be able to stop people from taking any supplements or drugs they want. If the government wants to require that the manufacturers put a label on an item stating all the concerns of the FDA, or stating flatly that "this is not fit for human consumption" or "this will kill humans", that's better than the government prohibiting people from using them. If we believe the government labels, we'll stop. If we don't believe the government, we'll use them anyway.
In responding to me please put aside scaled "recreational drugs", which are not really the subject of this thread. They are mainly offensive to me because of the welfare state. Otherwise, I believe that free men and women should have the right to kill themselves or otherwise choose to go to hell in whatever manner please them. But that's not what this post is about.
88
posted on
07/23/2005 12:13:16 PM PDT
by
labard1
To: disclaimer
89
posted on
07/27/2005 11:02:05 AM PDT
by
madfly
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-89 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson