Skip to comments.
NASA's new 'vision' raises questions about Mars (Griffin Comments)
eitb24 ^
| 07/17/2005
Posted on 07/17/2005 9:08:08 AM PDT by demlosers
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
1
posted on
07/17/2005 9:08:08 AM PDT
by
demlosers
To: demlosers
Somebody with the political clout to do so needs to tell NASA that Cydonia has to be the first thing they look at when they do go to Mars. Looking for evidence of germs when you have solid evidence of the remains of a megalithic city is beyond idiotic; it's a state of denial.
2
posted on
07/17/2005 9:14:45 AM PDT
by
tamalejoe
To: tamalejoe
Somebody with the political clout to do so needs to tell NASA that Cydonia has to be the first thing they look at when they do go to Mars. Looking for evidence of germs when you have solid evidence of the remains of a megalithic city is beyond idiotic; it's a state of denial.
Member of the Hoaxland cult I suppose...
To: tamalejoe
"solid evidence of the remains of a megalithic city "
You are kidding......aren't you?
4
posted on
07/17/2005 9:21:04 AM PDT
by
OSHA
(I've got a hole in my head too, but that's beside the point.)
To: demlosers
"If we don't go there, eventually other nations will, and 'eventually' may not be too long." America is still wide open to losing the space race, and losing in a permanent way that will affect its economic position and security on earth. Other countries are ahead now and moving farther ahead in education. Space is still America's baliwick, but at the rate things are going it won't be so much longer. Other nations will go there, it won't take all that long, and other nations may start claiming some resources. The 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty has the single objective of stopping America's private sector from developing space resources. Stopped cold.
5
posted on
07/17/2005 9:21:23 AM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Substance is essentially the relationship of accidents to itself)
To: Strategerist
Member of the Hoaxland cult I suppose... However, Cydonia is one of the more interesting places to visit first and it should be a priority.
6
posted on
07/17/2005 9:22:03 AM PDT
by
demlosers
(Allegra: Do not believe the garbage the media is feeding you back home.)
To: demlosers; KevinDavis
We should go to Mars ASAP if only just to plant the Stars & Stripes.
Inscription: It's ours. We'll get around to using it whenever we feel like it.
7
posted on
07/17/2005 9:23:13 AM PDT
by
AntiGuv
(™)
To: demlosers
The article is silly. The moon and Mars vision is still on-schedule, and it seems like it's what Griffin is focused on. Should Bush be out rah-rah-ing a Mars mission while we're having trouble even getting people into orbit at the moment? The CEV design hasn't even been chosen yet. Let's take things one step at a time, WashPost. Just because you haven't been getting press releases doesn't mean no work is being done.
8
posted on
07/17/2005 9:24:18 AM PDT
by
Phocion
(biologists : evolution :: economists : free trade -- on FR this analogy can have multiple meanings!)
To: Strategerist
All of those pictures are NASA photos. Hoagland is not manufacturing them with Photopaint.
9
posted on
07/17/2005 9:24:21 AM PDT
by
tamalejoe
To: AntiGuv
We have to withdraw from the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty first. Why are we still in that Treaty?
10
posted on
07/17/2005 9:24:56 AM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Substance is essentially the relationship of accidents to itself)
To: tamalejoe
All of those pictures are NASA photos. Hoagland is not manufacturing them with Photopaint.
He certainly encourages the miseducation and hallucinations of the ignorant, however.
To: tamalejoe
Those are natural features. It is natural to see 'things' in natural features, but then a closer look makes the 'things' disappear.
12
posted on
07/17/2005 9:30:27 AM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Substance is essentially the relationship of accidents to itself)
To: demlosers
I'll go - I'll even through in $37.76. I do need a zipper on my space suit though 'cause I take 2 diuretics.
13
posted on
07/17/2005 9:36:43 AM PDT
by
sandydipper
(Less government is best government!)
To: RightWhale
Karl Rove's great-grandfather emigrated from the Martian megalithic city in the mid-19th century. The records are available in the Ellis Island archives.
14
posted on
07/17/2005 9:36:51 AM PDT
by
ReadyNow
To: ReadyNow
So, what about the Treaty?
15
posted on
07/17/2005 9:40:35 AM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Substance is essentially the relationship of accidents to itself)
To: RightWhale
Those are natural features. It is natural to see 'things' in natural features, but then a closer look makes the 'things' disappear. Nonetheless, the IR images of Cydonia do have tantalizing patterns to go along with the other "natural" looking structures. Nobody knows for sure what's there, but it does make enough of a compelling case to visit Cydonia first when we do get the chance.
16
posted on
07/17/2005 9:44:06 AM PDT
by
demlosers
(Allegra: Do not believe the garbage the media is feeding you back home.)
To: tamalejoe
All of those pictures are NASA photos. Hoagland is not manufacturing them with Photopaint.Let me not be the last to say: "You're a kook".
17
posted on
07/17/2005 9:44:51 AM PDT
by
zarf
To: demlosers
Judging from the qualities of the barrens where they have placed their landers so far, driving a Rover around Cydonia couldn't possibly be less productive of scientific data than past missions and would at least quiet some of the speculation.
18
posted on
07/17/2005 9:52:24 AM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Substance is essentially the relationship of accidents to itself)
To: RightWhale
No good reason I can think of. The Treaty's days are numbered, anyhow. It's completely implausible to think that territorial claims will not be extended to space at some point in the future. I sure hope someone relevant is thinking about how we're gonna prevail in all that.
I say we should go ahead and declare our preemptive claims "just in case" (kinda like how it is with Antarctica).
We got this rock covered, now let's go ahead and pin down Mars. Someone should be forging a titanium flag that can withstand Venusian surface conditions as well. =)
19
posted on
07/17/2005 10:00:13 AM PDT
by
AntiGuv
(™)
To: RightWhale
Judging from the qualities of the barrens where they have placed their landers so far, driving a Rover around Cydonia couldn't possibly be less productive of scientific data than past missions and would at least quiet some of the speculation. Right.
In 2009, when NASA starts to send nuclear powered rovers to Mars, they should plan to send one to Cydonia. The more NASA shy away from interesting places, the more speculation they create. If they want to shut up Hoagland and et al, then investigate Cydonia. It's only going to get worse in the future.
20
posted on
07/17/2005 10:05:42 AM PDT
by
demlosers
(Allegra: Do not believe the garbage the media is feeding you back home.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson