Skip to comments.
New Leonardo picture discovered
BBC News ^
| Friday, 1 July, 2005
Posted on 07/01/2005 6:11:32 AM PDT by new cruelty
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
To: Coop
And here I thought maybe DiCaprio had a secret film hidden away.
Damned If I Know
21
posted on
07/01/2005 7:33:21 AM PDT
by
sharktrager
(My life is like a box of chocolates, but someone took all the good ones.)
Comment #22 Removed by Moderator
To: Coop
To: marty60
If you're referring to The DaVinci Code, I agree it's trash, but it's a work of fiction and you really shouldn't let it undermine your enjoyment or understanding of one of the most brilliant men who ever lived. His devotional artworks are unrivalled masterpieces.
24
posted on
07/01/2005 4:41:49 PM PDT
by
DGray
(http://nicanfhilidh.blogspot.com)
To: DGray
Actually I love his art work. It just seems so .... I can't think of the word to use. When people start drawing lines and concocting intire plots out of them. shoot I could do that with my tree in the back yard.
25
posted on
07/01/2005 4:47:59 PM PDT
by
marty60
To: Corin Stormhands
26
posted on
07/01/2005 4:49:30 PM PDT
by
RckyRaCoCo
("When you have to shoot, shoot, don't talk!")
To: Ditter
It wasn't a shortage of canvases that made him paint over it. This painting was on wood.
Besides, I don't believe any shortage of canvases was so severe that Leonardo was affected.
To: Corin Stormhands; Lijahsbubbe; aculeus; hellinahandcart
My favorite Leonardo picture... Haha, don't forget to wave "Buh-Bye!"
To: Graymatter
I did not mean to imply that there was a shortage of canvas fabric in Leonardos time. I used the term canvas, to mean his painting surface. What ever he painted on, canvas on stretchers, canvas glued to a board or a wood panel, it had to be made by him or someone. If a painting doesn't work out, most artists will use their 'painting surface' over again by painting over it. The fact that this author made a mystery out of it was dumb.
29
posted on
07/01/2005 5:41:48 PM PDT
by
Ditter
To: Sam Cree; Liz; Joe 6-pack; woofie; vannrox; giotto; iceskater; Conspiracy Guy; Dolphy; ...
Art Ping.
Let Sam Cree or me know if you want on or off the art ping list.
Artists paint over images allt he time. I think the more fascinating question is between the two Virgin of the Rock paintings: one in London, one at the Louvre. Why do two similar images, and does this question relate to why he painted over the other drawing underneath.
Trust a professor to take all this too seriously.
To: Republicanprofessor
He probably had a client who liked the brighter colors and flesh tones (and wanted halos on the Saints.)
< g >
31
posted on
07/01/2005 6:45:39 PM PDT
by
AnAmericanMother
(. . . Ministrix of ye Chace (recess appointment), TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary . . .)
To: Graymatter; Ditter
It's not a shortage, per se . . . they get tired of looking at the unfinished stuff that didn't work out for some reason (not to mention a prospective client might see it), and they get an order in the door, so they paint over the work-in-progress. Voila! two problems solved.
32
posted on
07/01/2005 6:47:44 PM PDT
by
AnAmericanMother
(. . . Ministrix of ye Chace (recess appointment), TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary . . .)
To: Republicanprofessor
My theory? He had a client who saw the first work and offered him money to make a copy. Leo then said, "Sure. I got this other primed panel with nothing but a sketch on it. I'll just paint over it with a composition I already worked out, and turn a few quick ducats."
33
posted on
07/01/2005 6:53:06 PM PDT
by
LexBaird
(tyrannosaurus Lex, unapologetic carnivore)
To: LexBaird
Not a bad theory. Now, to prove it, you'd have to read his journals, with his backwards writing in Italian, and interpret it correctly, and back it up with visuals, and present it at a conference or publish it through a refereed journal or...
Just propose a theory on FR. I like that system the best, and, you know what, I think more people read it and care than about the scholarly *$&#.
To: new cruelty
New Leonardo picture discoveredAs if Titanic wasn't bad enough.
35
posted on
07/01/2005 7:01:45 PM PDT
by
dfwgator
To: marty60
I'm amazed at how so many people are willing to abandon the centuries and centuries old Bible to accept the 3 year old fictional DaVinci code! They accept it as "gospel" just because Mr. Browne says it's all true. Mr. Browne even got DATES wrong (which would have been easily researched and verified, if he really wanted to DO research.) Unbelievable ignorance.
To: AnAmericanMother
And it matched the couch.
37
posted on
07/01/2005 7:22:40 PM PDT
by
des
To: des
Don't forget the carpet!
38
posted on
07/01/2005 7:40:41 PM PDT
by
AnAmericanMother
(. . . Ministrix of ye Chace (recess appointment), TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary . . .)
To: 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember; afraidfortherepublic; Alas; al_c; american colleen; annalex; ...
39
posted on
07/01/2005 9:57:45 PM PDT
by
Coleus
("Woe unto him that call evil good and good evil"-- Isaiah 5:20-21)
To: Coleus
Your are going to torture me all night but my friend Coleus I plan to go to bed in 5 minutes-Ha
40
posted on
07/01/2005 10:04:38 PM PDT
by
fatima
(Make a move and the Bunny gets it.-Guess what movie)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson