Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
To: churchillbuff
Prurient in its focus, shameless in its methodology and vile in execution, this volume is a near-perfect example of what has come to be called "bio-porn," a particularly noxious subgenre of the polemic literature that nowadays infests our bestseller lists. I thought this was the stuff liberals cataloged as free speech?
The way to handle "The Truth About Hillary" responsibly is to give it no further notice, no wider discussion.
I also thought liberals were all for open debate?
If the serious media can't draw the line on this one, then there no longer are any lines to draw.
The lines no longer exist because liberals have pushed them over the cliff.
funny... they can dish it out, but sure as hell can't take it
32 posted on
06/27/2005 11:00:30 AM PDT by
lunarbicep
("Democracy is a device that ensures we shall be governed no better than we deserve." - G. B. Shaw)
To: churchillbuff
Well, sometimes the truth is sordid.
33 posted on
06/27/2005 11:03:37 AM PDT by
Tribune7
To: churchillbuff
this book is a trojan horse.
its mission is to convince the average person that nothing they've heard about hillary is true.
hillary emerges with a clean slate.
35 posted on
06/27/2005 11:09:31 AM PDT by
ken21
(it takes a village to steal your child + to steal your property! /s)
To: churchillbuff
For a book of "fiction" they sure are in a panic.
The best course of action would be for them to refute the charges made in the book. Unless, of course, they can't.
Then again, they could call for an old-fashioned book burning.
37 posted on
06/27/2005 11:13:23 AM PDT by
SerpentDove
(Oh, what's his name...he lives in a pineapple under the sea...)
To: churchillbuff
Keep talking, Libs. You'll make me order a copy.
38 posted on
06/27/2005 11:21:52 AM PDT by
hattend
(Alaska....in a time warp all it's own!)
To: churchillbuff
"...makes you wonder whether there really isn't an argument to be made for book burning."
I see it as an argument for burning the witches.
39 posted on
06/27/2005 11:25:01 AM PDT by
GSlob
To: churchillbuff
When she's queen, he'll be a duke.
46 posted on
06/27/2005 12:19:18 PM PDT by
tsomer
To: churchillbuff
It's amazing. Hill is a lowlife, and Libs act as if sordid facts about her shouldn't be made public. What about the Bush family, the Reagans or half a dozen other conservative figures? They have no problem publicly drooling over baldfaced lies about them.
51 posted on
06/27/2005 12:48:39 PM PDT by
hershey
To: churchillbuff
57 posted on
06/27/2005 2:19:01 PM PDT by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: churchillbuff
"Serious media???!!!?"
HAHAHAHAHAHAA!!!!!
60 posted on
06/27/2005 5:35:00 PM PDT by
sauropod
(Polite political action is about as useful as a miniskirt in a convent -- Claire Wolfe)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson